No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
The Pac 10 only plays 18 games...not 20. But you are right. 16 is plenty, the conference power will shift back and forth all of the time. There is no need to add any more conference games and moving the tourney is a dumb idea imo. The gap b/t the 2 divisions is way overblown. If the North wins just 2 more games, then the season series is tied at 18. The thing that killed the North was CU and they are a few years away depending on who they hire. On the opposite end of the spectrum is ku as they were the best team in the conference and the Cats had to play them twice.
ku had by far the easiest conference schedule this year b/c they got OSU, UT, and A&M at home and they can't play against themselves. KSU would probably have another top 50 win or two if they had that schedule. The same could be said if they played in the South b/c they would have had more shots at the higher rpi'd teams.
Oh well, we are going to the NIT and need to make the best of it. B12 is fine the way it is and 65 is plenty (maybe one too many) for the NCAA. Like Huggs said...we just need to win more games.