Date: 14/08/25 - 21:38 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Ron Prince e-mail to boosters (late '06 or early '07)  (Read 2234 times)

September 16, 2009, 03:08:47 PM
Read 2234 times

Guscat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 353
Ran across this e-mail from Ron Prince to KSU supporters, which lays a great deal of blame at the feet of former coaching staff.  Read it for yourself and see what you think:

Thank you for addressing this with me directly, I really appreciate it. I've had the chance to meet you and get to know you a little bit and your reaction is not unexpected.
>
>This is a very lengthy response. I try to respond to every letter, email and call so that you do not have to go to tabloid sources for information. Please feel free to respond after reading it. This is a very critical moment in the growth/development of this program and I want you to decide for yourself with as much information as I can give you.
>
>My first objective before the discussions with the administration & upon arrival in Manhattan was to look at "why". Why would a coach retire after so much success? Why did the team, after winning the Big XII championship finish in last place in the north division two straight years? The bottom line is that there is never one thing, its many things or everything. From planning, to performance, to attitudes and to drive/hunger. I asked a lot of questions, did a lot of listening, reading and watching. Well, I set a plan to do the following:
>
>1) Fix recruiting. Everything from who, what, where, why and how. The roster was about to undergo a deep transition because of the next two senior classes being devoid of so many players who "signed" but never made it to Manhattan or players who couldn't hold it together enough to stay in school. We just didn't think we had enough talent to sustain winning in the future and evaluated that was a main difference in the recent teams and those teams that won the Big 12 north titles.
>
>Recruiting is not "sales" and "fast-talking", its a plan. Parents commit their kids to us for 4 years and their decisions are the life-blood of a college football program. From emphasis, to evaluation, to building the talent pool, to strategizing and finally "the fit".
>
>I know we are on the right track from both a "tool/talent" aspect as well as a "make-up" standpoint. While we will be a young team again this year, the future is very bright.
>
>2) Immediately fix the adult/student relationship in the building. Some of asst coaches & people in the Vanier Complex at K-State let all of you down, bottom line. Beside recruiting, there were other issues (that are not appropriate for me to repeat) that were occuring and those things were eroding the confidence of the players, and discouraging people in the program who were working passionately to "win". There were some people just going thru the motions and some simply not even moving. Understand the standard that was set at K-State(you got everyone's attn in college football) and now all the competition is reacting to that standard and some people in our organization rested on their laurels. I asked some very close friends of mine to come and help me get this program turned around. They did. In fact, I tried to warn them how hard this was going to be and that it could effectively be viewed as the toughest job they would ever tackle and it may cost us in ways we may not now know. They came anyhow. They believed in what we were here to do. This year took its toll on everyone involved, so we could get back into the post season, which was a "minimum" requirement for the organization but unexpected by anyone evaluating the program. Some "experts" (including media) thought we would win as few as one game.
>
>I believe, just as my old boss at Virginia believes, that you reward and advance those people who sacrifice and accomplish "above and beyond" the call of duty. That is what has occured with the asst coaches this offseason. I feel very proud about what we accomplished this season, considering where we came from, but we are not National Champions at K-State yet! These coaches and others put the program on their backs and carried it to a bowl game, winning season, win over Texas, two terrific recruiting classes despite the fact that EVERYONE had us dead-in-the-water picked consensus last place pre-season. Could everyone be wrong? Why did everyone say "it couldn't be done"? No, there was reason that the team was in legitimate danger of finishing last for the third straight year, but a small group of people changed all that. I am grateful to those people and loyal to them. That's why, I will not stand in the way of those coaches and their families being rewarded by advancement(Tim Horton became an offensive coordinator), financial reward(Raheem Morris Tampa almost doubling his salary) or lifestyle(Abby Boustead to pursue her MBA to run a company someday). They basically did not see their families and put life on hold for a year. I told them that it would be this hard and it was. They kept fighting, yet others just sat.
>
>The football profession took notice of the work we did this year. Many, many programs came in pursuit of all our coaches(including the head coach) for the incredible job we did this year and for what people know we will do in the future(key point). Some of them could not say no and it would be irresponsible for us(K-State) to compete with NFL type salaries, especially when we have infrastructure issues to address for the long-term success of this program. The changing economics in asst coaching salaries are due to a couple of factors. First, with the success of Tony Dungy, Lovie Smith, Sean Payton and Herm Edwards, many programs(college & pro) are wanting to find the next terrific coach who can do what these gentlemen have done. Some of our coaches that did not leave(James Franklin/Tim Tibesar/Matt Wallerstedt), but could have, fit that mold and will be sought in the future. Second, the salaries that some programs(Alabama-2.5 million pool per yr) are now paying for asst coaches has changed, forever, the economic landscape and all of their direct competitors(SEC & teams they recruit against) have taken an aggressive position "to compete/survive" financially with them (Pat Washington going to Miss State to recruit his hometown of Mobile, Al).
>
>Even coaches that haven't coached a snap here at K-State, who are excellent coaches, once identified with us, they became targets(Wes McGriff going to Miami). In years to come we have others who will be as aggressively pursued, because they are very good at what they do and have a work-ethic that is know in our business as being a "grinder". These coaches are no different than the young person trying to make partner in a law, advertising or consulting firm.
>
>If this sounds strange to you, go back and look at coach Snyder's tenure (and before) and you'll see some of the best coaches in college & professional football were once asst coaches here. Some were successful and well known here and for some it didn't work out and they had more success elsewhere. Its part of our business. This is a major factor about being the head coach at K-State(asst coach turnover) that I knew before I took the job. Its my job to replace them with other great coaches, not just guys who won't leave. I've got news for you, we have.
>
>Frank Leonard, who we just hired to coach the tight ends, turned down multiple lucrative NFL coaching jobs to come to K-State this offseason for much less. He's spent the last few years with the best football organization in the world-the New England Patriots. He's here because he believes in what we're doing.
>
>Dave Brock, who will coach our wr's, turned down a job to coach with Rutgers to come here(and he's from New Jersey!). Watch the Univ of North Carolina in the next couple of seasons, because as recruiting coordinator, he assembled two of the best classes in their schools' history that coach Bunting elected to red-shirt and now Butch Davis will reap the rewards for.
>
>We've had coaches (Ricky Rahne and our newest defensive graduate assistant) give up their full-time coaching jobs at other places to come and work for free as graduate assistants here at K-State because they know we will do it right, we will win and if they work hard-they too will advance.
>
>All these guys are rising super stars in the business, you've just never heard of them. You shouldn't, that's not your job-its mine.
>
>There's no free lunch for these coaches. We work hard, long hours with much stress and pressure. We wouldn't have it any other way. Its the only way to get where we want to go. If coaches don't or can't perform they know it causes the organization to suffer. But they all have wives and families they must provide for and students at K-State they are responsible to & for.
>
>3) Evaluate all aspects of the program.
>We have completed a year long evaluation of every department and every aspect of our program. I made no changes in the support staff on our arrival, although it was my right to do so. I did not want to come in and fire everyone with no chance to evaluate their abilities. I'm glad that we waited.
>
>We have terrific people in the support staff who are working hard and dedicated to excellence and they too will be highly sought after. Unfortunately, we discovered some who are not and will not. I will not go into the specifics of some of those evaluations but we have some of the very best people I have ever been around in some areas and unfortunately in other areas the performances has been so low for so long that change must be made.
>
>I am evaluated on the performance of this organization on whole and on game day. We are committed to being the best organization in college football. Period. I need people who will support me in that mission. Good enough never is. The standards have been raised by the last 18 yrs and everyone in our organization must perform his/her job for us to win.
>
>Every aspect of the program contributes to winning and we can not accept a refusal to perform, lack of performance nor any underminding of the program on any level. For example, we inherited a team, last december, in which 43 of the 85 scholarship players were on academic warning. Meaning, if they had a repeat performance in the classroom, they could be lost, and certainly not graduate. Compound this with the players who had the football skills to finish last, for two straight years and we only had ONE player on the entire team that I could promote for any scholar-athlete award. Those are facts. Changes were going to be necessary for us to survive immediately but also to look parents in-the-eye for the recruitment of their sons. I'm proud to report, that this december, we had 6 players with a 4.0 gpa and 32 players OVER a 3.0gpa. Those 32 were named to the Big 12 commissioner's Honor Roll. On a team that finished 2nd in the north division in our first year! Had we not been willing to change, we may not have been able to win a single game because so many players may have been lost. I very proud of everyone associated with the academic support aspect because they were able, willing & excited to face the brutal truth and look for ways to reach our goals.
>
>4) Set the standards & demand compliance to them.
>I know how "change-adverse" we are in this part of the country(I'm from here) but throughout our program, we have addressed similar issues. We have seen vast improvement and in other areas we have met with resistance, coupled with a lack of performance.
>
>Many people outside of the organization do not know the importance of some positions and what they entail these days because of what those roles may sounded like when they were in high school or college many years ago. Everything we do is important and we have taken an entire year to evaluate the job performance of everyone.
>
>Many people believed that there would only now be one successful period of K-State football. In fact, most of them, didn't believe there would ever be a successful period. Most of them are quick to remind me, how awful K-State was in football not so long ago. I know! I was here! Who would want to go back to those "low moments" and "low expectations", not me. Many of these people are refered to in the title of Bill Snyder's book, "They said it couldn't be done."
>
>I reject such negativity, just as Bill Snyder did in 1988. I will not submit to it and will not allow it in this organization. Change is uncomfortable for some, I understand that. However, I'm asking that you look at the last 14 months and as change occurs, use the body-of-work to compare it against. People in this organization are expected and excited to perform, bottom-line.
>
>The 1982 Independence Bowl trophy was not on display with all the others until we arrived. We will honor the past but will not live in it.
>
>5) Plan and expect to win
>We are in the middle of our strategic planning phase for the upcoming year right now. These 6 weeks after signing date but before spring practice are the most important during the year. It is during this time we must decide who we will pursue(specifically) for next year and in concept what recruits our systems need in subsequent years. We will decide on the tactics and strategies that we will implement for next season now, so we have the time to train, develop, practice those methods that will help us win next year.
>That kind of specific planning and detail of agenda allows us to do a couple of things. One) our coaches to research all of the possible scenarios that could come up with on our opponents and to compare notes with many of our colleagues who might encounter the same. Two) allow our players to train and develop the specific skills they need so we do not waste time. For example, we were so out of shape last year, we could not sustain the tempo of a single practice and we fell further behind the competition as many of our players failed our basic conditioning test! It took us mid-way thru the year to "catch-up" and we lost some valuable training and therefore game-winning opportunities. That will not happen this season.
>
>I have never been more excited about a team or season in my career as a player or coach. I continue to tell recruits and coaches that K-State is the best coaching job in the country for the following reasons and I'm determined to win at the highest level here because of the following:
>One) we have a small but loyal fan base that demonstrates its love for K-State around every turn. 32K at last yrs spring game-never done before. 30K at this year's bowl game-has become the standard. 50k at every home game and unbelievable support for road games. This includes our student body!
>Two) we have the best administration in the country. They have invested their time and efforts to help recruit and support these student-athletes & coaches like no other place in the country. Rutgers, Marshall and others consistently point to the Jon Wefald, Kansas State model for university success.
>Three) Big 12 divisional play. We are so fortunate to have geographical division play in our conference. We have a chance each year to compete for the north division title. By winning that game, you are invited to the BCS tournament. That is our mission. We are putting our team together from a talent and make-up stand point to accomplish this.
>Four) we can attract terrific players to Manhattan/K-State. This game is about people and their relationships with each other, bottom line. Talented players from high school and junior college have come here and there is a reputation nation-wide for the expectation of excellence here. The kids that are in high school do not recall the dreary old days of failure, thank goodness. They don't fear, they don't despair. They know K-State as a nationally respected football program. Everyone they encounter must represent that when they visit.
>
>In conclusion, surely there are some that would like to see us fail. One group would be those that support our competitors' programs. I get that, it makes sense to me. Others may like to us fail for a variety of other reasons that are difficult to pin-down, be wary of those. However, there so many who want us and need us to succeed that we must stay focused on those individuals. We have a plan, we are demanding, we have integrity, we are fair and we will continue to succeed.
>Thank you for your time.
>Go State!
>
>Ron Prince
>Head Football Coach
>Kansas State University
>
>[email protected]
>800 992-9053
>785 532-7956 fax
>inside.kstatesports.com


September 16, 2009, 03:11:24 PM
Reply #1

B12Supplement

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 136
Ron Prince has always needed to shut the &@#% up.

September 16, 2009, 03:14:35 PM
Reply #2

Pett

  • Premium Member
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8319
  • Personal Text
    Hey, basketball!!!
JFC, that's like a book. I wondered what Ron was doing with all of his time in Vanier...

September 16, 2009, 03:22:34 PM
Reply #3

EllToPay

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1291
  • Personal Text
    Natural Born Leader
that e-mail better have been to one of the university's top ten boosters. if it was to regular joe schmo fan, then what a complete douche that had too much time on his hands worrying about what people think.

September 16, 2009, 03:25:07 PM
Reply #4

Guscat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 353
There were about 30 recipients of the e-mail.

September 16, 2009, 03:29:50 PM
Reply #5

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=8331.0

ronald was pretty much spot on with what was wrong with KSU when he took over (not that it took a scary smart person to figure out what our problems were), he just did all those same wrong things and then decided to emphasize academics, which is incredibly stupid.

September 16, 2009, 03:32:17 PM
Reply #6

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
I remember that very well.

I also remember the bagillion "I love Ron, it's Bills fault" posts on GPC immediately following that email.  Nowadays, I read a bagillion posts saying exactly the same thing, but the coaches names have been switched.

Maybe both are correct? :dunno:

September 16, 2009, 04:03:10 PM
Reply #7

EmporiaWildcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 925
If I had read that two plus years ago, I'd be  :excited: times 10.

But, that's the problem with Ron Princess.  All talk, no walk.

Frack you, dude.
I'd much rather have a 69 year old coach than one that weighs 400+ pounds.

September 16, 2009, 04:15:29 PM
Reply #8

catfan28

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1224
Ron forgot..........

-Beat Kansas

-Beat Missouri

September 16, 2009, 04:17:42 PM
Reply #9

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile
Yeah, I remember it well.  My reaction at the time was to roll my eyes at Prince and all the rubes who bought into his line of crap.  (Krause being Rube #1.)

:blahblah:
每個人一野貓!

September 16, 2009, 04:20:33 PM
Reply #10

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Ron forgot..........

-Beat Kansas

-Beat Missouri

This is why you're a terrible poster. All that material above, and you still obsess over Kansas. JFC, Dallas.

September 16, 2009, 04:31:14 PM
Reply #11

catfan28

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1224
Ron forgot..........

-Beat Kansas

-Beat Missouri

This is why you're a terrible poster. All that material above, and you still obsess over Kansas. JFC, Dallas.


All that material above is just Ron blowing smoke up every K-Stater's arse. It's not that hard to figure out. But all the big spenders ARE concerned about Mizzou and ku passing us up.

But glad that you're staying classy Kougs.

September 16, 2009, 04:44:19 PM
Reply #12

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Ron forgot..........

-Beat Kansas

-Beat Missouri

This is why you're a terrible poster. All that material above, and you still obsess over Kansas. JFC, Dallas.


All that material above is just Ron blowing smoke up every K-Stater's arse. It's not that hard to figure out. But all the big spenders ARE concerned about Mizzou and ku passing us up.

But glad that you're staying classy Kougs.

ku and MU are just two games on the sched like any other, cowboy.

September 16, 2009, 04:46:09 PM
Reply #13

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
you are delusional k24. the ku game is huge. mangino has built his career on beating ksu and mu. he literally did nothing else until 2007.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

September 16, 2009, 04:47:33 PM
Reply #14

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
you are delusional k24. the ku game is huge. mangino has built his career on beating ksu and mu. he literally did nothing else until 2007.

If we win the ku game and lose every other, or if we win 2 other B12N games and lose to ku, which scenario would you take?

September 16, 2009, 04:49:54 PM
Reply #15

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
you are delusional k24. the ku game is huge. mangino has built his career on beating ksu and mu. he literally did nothing else until 2007.

If we win the ku game and lose every other, or if we win 2 other B12N games and lose to ku, which scenario would you take?

the two big 12 N games, easy. Regardless the ku game is huge. just look at catfan28 (representation of ksu fanbase, which matters)
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

September 16, 2009, 04:58:15 PM
Reply #16

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
you are delusional k24. the ku game is huge. mangino has built his career on beating ksu and mu. he literally did nothing else until 2007.

If we win the ku game and lose every other, or if we win 2 other B12N games and lose to ku, which scenario would you take?

the two big 12 N games, easy.

Then you think, as I do, that the ku game is just another game. The ku game only becomes extra important to the fanbase when the coach is losing enough games overall to put him on the hot seat. Think of it as the tipping point.

And MU? GTFO. Nebraska is a far more hated "rival" than Mizzou to us.

September 16, 2009, 05:22:36 PM
Reply #17

QuinnMac

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4238
  • Personal Text
    CTR is back on: Hornsdown





Are you seeking validation?
-Find it at community college

September 16, 2009, 05:34:05 PM
Reply #18

catsdo

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 365
I think most fans would choose to win a bunch of games, even if it meant losing to ku.  It doesn't matter because Prince couldn't do either.

September 16, 2009, 05:39:08 PM
Reply #19

GoldbrickGangBoss

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2590
  • Personal Text
    THE b IS NOT CAPITALIZED
Quote
The football profession took notice of the work we did this year. Many, many programs came in pursuit of all our coaches(including the head coach) for the incredible job we did this year and for what people know we will do in the future(key point).

I've said it many times before and I'll say it again...

I'm gonna really miss Ron Prince.  :shy:
I'm telling you, this is not ANYTHING like the team from the beginning of conference play. You will see no more blowouts like what happened in OOC.  If we lose, it will not because these kids gave up, and it will be at the buzzer. -Rodless, before 97-70

September 16, 2009, 05:48:51 PM
Reply #20

Bullfn33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2152
Quote
The football profession took notice of the work we did this year. Many, many programs came in pursuit of all our coaches(including the head coach) for the incredible job we did this year and for what people know we will do in the future(key point).

Every time I see this email now I'm like, "hey, &@#% you Prince." The only reason you did anything in '06 is because you had Snyder's players. You continue to blow all that smoke in the email and then go out and make every situation mentioned above 10 times worse than it was. Ron Prince is a 100% talk, zero walk douchebag. The worse D1 coach in CFB history, history.
Show me defense.

September 16, 2009, 06:25:01 PM
Reply #21

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Holy $hit are you kidding me . . . K-State, ku and mu revolve around one Metro Area (St. Louis doesn't give a f_ck about MU) . . . controlling that series is mega important.   Ask yourself, what one win caused Bill Snyder to go running out on the field, pumping his fists and then jumping into Jim Leavitt's (or was it Del Miller) waiting arms??  It sure as $hit wasn't beating Okie State, or Lousiana Tech.   When K-State beat MU down in Columbia in '96, Bill Snyder stood outside the dressing room addressing the media and he literally jizzed his pants he was that happy.   

LOL @ Kougs . . . geezus . . . :facepalm:

September 16, 2009, 06:44:33 PM
Reply #22

cireksu

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2498
gotta go with dax here.  logic says yes they are another game.  But they aren't to our fanbase.

September 16, 2009, 06:49:57 PM
Reply #23

Joker

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1148
  • Personal Text
    IT'S DIVISION ONE FOOTBALL!!!
gotta go with dax here.  logic says yes they are another game.  But they aren't to our fanbase.

Not to mention recruiting.

September 16, 2009, 07:05:55 PM
Reply #24

frankencat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 639
  • Personal Text
    Aren't I a cute cub ?
Beating uk is what matters, and Snyd always made it a big game.  If we win no others games this year and beat the fat slob I'll be happy :hope:

September 16, 2009, 07:40:28 PM
Reply #25

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
gotta go with dax here.  logic says yes they are another game.  But they aren't to our fanbase.

Another.

Don't get me wrong, going 2-10 and beating ku and MU isn't the goal.  But I think its pretty clear that if you are regularly beating those 2, you probably regularly win enough games to go bowling.  Plus, winning those games is going to get you another 4 or 5 local recruits minimum.  Do that 4 years in a row and your talking about 15-20 kids possibly on your roster that make your program better.  

Again, no one will argue that we can completely build with just Kansas/Missouri/surrounding area kids.  But we've seen the last few years when you aren't getting those kids what happens.  We're fooling ourselves if we don't think we have to get local kids AND find kids outside the area, namely Texas.  IMO the nature of college football, and especially the recent success of ku and MU, has shown you've got to win more battles than you lose for local kids.  We used to own both programs, now we continually get beat out by both in recruiting.  If you don't see that as a big problem I'm not sure what you're looking at.

September 16, 2009, 07:55:29 PM
Reply #26

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
gotta go with dax here.  logic says yes they are another game.  But they aren't to our fanbase.

Another.

Don't get me wrong, going 2-10 and beating ku and MU isn't the goal.  But I think its pretty clear that if you are regularly beating those 2, you probably regularly win enough games to go bowling.  Plus, winning those games is going to get you another 4 or 5 local recruits minimum.  Do that 4 years in a row and your talking about 15-20 kids possibly on your roster that make your program better.  

Again, no one will argue that we can completely build with just Kansas/Missouri/surrounding area kids.  But we've seen the last few years when you aren't getting those kids what happens.  We're fooling ourselves if we don't think we have to get local kids AND find kids outside the area, namely Texas.  IMO the nature of college football, and especially the recent success of ku and MU, has shown you've got to win more battles than you lose for local kids.  We used to own both programs, now we continually get beat out by both in recruiting.  If you don't see that as a big problem I'm not sure what you're looking at.

That logic fails because we weren't getting Texas kids either. It wasn't the lack of KS kids that killed us, _FAN.

And I don't give a f*** about our fanbase, we're collectively retarded. We have a large collection of people who dedicate message board post milestones to the phrase "ku SUCKS!" for f***'s sake. Idiots.

September 16, 2009, 08:04:45 PM
Reply #27

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
gotta go with dax here.  logic says yes they are another game.  But they aren't to our fanbase.

Another.

Don't get me wrong, going 2-10 and beating ku and MU isn't the goal.  But I think its pretty clear that if you are regularly beating those 2, you probably regularly win enough games to go bowling.  Plus, winning those games is going to get you another 4 or 5 local recruits minimum.  Do that 4 years in a row and your talking about 15-20 kids possibly on your roster that make your program better.  

Again, no one will argue that we can completely build with just Kansas/Missouri/surrounding area kids.  But we've seen the last few years when you aren't getting those kids what happens.  We're fooling ourselves if we don't think we have to get local kids AND find kids outside the area, namely Texas.  IMO the nature of college football, and especially the recent success of ku and MU, has shown you've got to win more battles than you lose for local kids.  We used to own both programs, now we continually get beat out by both in recruiting.  If you don't see that as a big problem I'm not sure what you're looking at.

That logic fails because we weren't getting Texas kids either. It wasn't the lack of KS kids that killed us, _FAN.

And I don't give a f*** about our fanbase, we're collectively retarded. We have a large collection of people who dedicate message board post milestones to the phrase "ku SUCKS!" for f***'s sake. Idiots.

Not going to deny we have to do better with outside kids.  Texas is just an example.  Pull kids from Florida, along the the Southeast, whatever.  We've got to get plenty of those and we'll see what happens there, Texas is just the logical place to go.

But getting no local kids (not just Kansas) is certainly not helping this program.  And certainly not turning the local coaches completely away from the program like Prince did.  That's just stupid.

September 16, 2009, 08:07:15 PM
Reply #28

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
gotta go with dax here.  logic says yes they are another game.  But they aren't to our fanbase.

Another.

Don't get me wrong, going 2-10 and beating ku and MU isn't the goal.  But I think its pretty clear that if you are regularly beating those 2, you probably regularly win enough games to go bowling.  Plus, winning those games is going to get you another 4 or 5 local recruits minimum.  Do that 4 years in a row and your talking about 15-20 kids possibly on your roster that make your program better.  

Again, no one will argue that we can completely build with just Kansas/Missouri/surrounding area kids.  But we've seen the last few years when you aren't getting those kids what happens.  We're fooling ourselves if we don't think we have to get local kids AND find kids outside the area, namely Texas.  IMO the nature of college football, and especially the recent success of ku and MU, has shown you've got to win more battles than you lose for local kids.  We used to own both programs, now we continually get beat out by both in recruiting.  If you don't see that as a big problem I'm not sure what you're looking at.

That logic fails because we weren't getting Texas kids either. It wasn't the lack of KS kids that killed us, _FAN.

And I don't give a f*** about our fanbase, we're collectively retarded. We have a large collection of people who dedicate message board post milestones to the phrase "ku SUCKS!" for f***'s sake. Idiots.

Not going to deny we have to do better with outside kids.  Texas is just an example.  Pull kids from Florida, along the the Southeast, whatever.  We've got to get plenty of those and we'll see what happens there, Texas is just the logical place to go.

But getting no local kids (not just Kansas) is certainly not helping this program.  And certainly not turning the local coaches completely away from the program like Prince did.  That's just stupid.

Of course burning the local bridges was stupid. But that has nothing whatsoever to do with circling the Kansas game. Bill only circles the Kansas game because he knows our retarded fanbase values it above all others.

September 16, 2009, 08:15:47 PM
Reply #29

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
Of course burning the local bridges was stupid. But that has nothing whatsoever to do with circling the Kansas game. Bill only circles the Kansas game because he knows our retarded fanbase values it above all others.

That's part of it, but I refuse to believe that's the only reason Bill ever circled that game.  He's not that dumb.