As anyone who has the read the board lately knows, a "hot" topic of conversation has been the Big 12 north. From the reversal of fortune for dominant powers like KSU to the uprise of a plucky Missouri, since its inception the B12N has been nothing but thrilling! Below is a graphical "history" of the B12N, chronicling the number of conference wins per season since 1996.

What a ride!
As I was preparing this chart, a small child wandered up to me, and in her innocence asked about the large spike for the green line in 2007.
"That seems out of place!", she pointed.
I replied, "Well, my dear, you have a keen eye, but I think this calls for some statistical analysis."
So I did.
I applied Grubbs' test for outliers to ku's complete B12 conference record. Lo and behold, the 2007 was indeed classified as a statistical anomaly (almost the very definition of fluke). In fact, there was a less than 5% chance for that season to occur, and less than 5% chance it will happen again (given ku's conference record thus far).
But wait a minute Chingon! What about the rest of the B12N? Surely your analysis would should they had fluke seasons as well? Below is a chart of the results:

Plotted is the "Z" value (a measure of flukiness) vs year. The yellow line is the cut for outlier data in a sample of 13 events.
When the exact same analysis is applied to other B12N teams and as it turns out, only ku's 2007 season was anomalous.
The 2007 ku FB team was the flukiest team in the history of the B12N (and probably the B12 as whole, that work is to be done...)
As an aside 1998, 2004, 2005, and 2008 were KSU's most out of character seasons.