I'm just repeating kenpom. 
Kent, shoots more than Sutton and samuels, and twice as much as Ron Anderson. I mean, c'mon. His retarded jump shots and turnovers hurt a lot more than Colon's missed layups. Kent would miss a lot of layups, too, but he doesn't take many.
I dunno. I think a lot of the usage difference has to be because Martin asks more of Kent than he does of Colon. I'd still take Kent, even with the turnovers.
Yes, this kind of leads to the question of what is better: someone who does a lot, and does it poorly, or someone who does very little pretty well?
Agree w/ sys, it kind of depends who's on the court at the same time.
Like, if Sutton's on the court, I'd rather have Colon. C-Merr, I'd rather have Kent.
If I had to pick one or the other not knowing who they'd be playing with, I'd go w/ Colon.