Quote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 01:10:43 PMQuote from: steve dave on March 10, 2009, 01:04:49 PMQuote from: yosh on March 10, 2009, 12:59:26 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:54:49 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.WTF? No they aren't. Best record = highest winning percentage. There is no other way to measure it. Are you retarded or something? This is so absurd i would honestly like to hear the difference between winning percentage and win/loss record. perhaps Joe Posnanski will be by to help you sort it out
Quote from: steve dave on March 10, 2009, 01:04:49 PMQuote from: yosh on March 10, 2009, 12:59:26 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:54:49 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.WTF? No they aren't. Best record = highest winning percentage. There is no other way to measure it. Are you retarded or something? This is so absurd i would honestly like to hear the difference between winning percentage and win/loss record.
Quote from: yosh on March 10, 2009, 12:59:26 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:54:49 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.WTF? No they aren't. Best record = highest winning percentage. There is no other way to measure it. Are you retarded or something? This is so absurd
Quote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:54:49 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.WTF? No they aren't. Best record = highest winning percentage. There is no other way to measure it. Are you retarded or something?
Quote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.
Quote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it is
Quote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's not
Quote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it is
Quote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's not
and frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball
Quote from: pissclams on March 10, 2009, 01:19:18 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 01:10:43 PMQuote from: steve dave on March 10, 2009, 01:04:49 PMQuote from: yosh on March 10, 2009, 12:59:26 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:54:49 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.WTF? No they aren't. Best record = highest winning percentage. There is no other way to measure it. Are you retarded or something? This is so absurd i would honestly like to hear the difference between winning percentage and win/loss record. perhaps Joe Posnanski will be by to help you sort it out I can't believe that old bastard is still coaching.
Quote from: JTKSU on March 10, 2009, 01:20:28 PMQuote from: pissclams on March 10, 2009, 01:19:18 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 01:10:43 PMQuote from: steve dave on March 10, 2009, 01:04:49 PMQuote from: yosh on March 10, 2009, 12:59:26 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:54:49 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:47:20 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on March 10, 2009, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 12:32:39 PMQuote from: mcmwcatand frank's record is the 6th best in big 12 history. not bad for aau thug ball No it's notyes it isNo it's notyes it isBest overall record and highest winning percentage are two completely different things.WTF? No they aren't. Best record = highest winning percentage. There is no other way to measure it. Are you retarded or something? This is so absurd i would honestly like to hear the difference between winning percentage and win/loss record. perhaps Joe Posnanski will be by to help you sort it out I can't believe that old bastard is still coaching. he's still coaching because he, just like Jank, is a great coach. you should check out his winning percentage, it's incredible. don't focus on his win/loss record though, i don't think it tells the whole story to how great of a coach he is.
Jank would probably have Willie Warren right now at K-State and would have Huggins' recruits playing at a higher level. Jank recruited tons of talent to ku and Illinois, why wouldn't he be able to do it at K-State? You guys are getting killed on this one. Almost worse than the Dezmon Briscoe > Lamark Brown thread.
Jank recruited approximately half of the players that played in championships with ku and Illinois. Where are you getting the idea that he can't recruit? Martin would be nothing without Delonte. . . K-State's 08 recruiting class was the worst in the Big 12.
K-State's 08 recruiting class was the worst in the Big 12.
Bill Self, Roy Williams, Bob Knight, Rick Barnes, Eddie Sutton, Billy Gillispie, etc., etc., all have better overall records than Frank Martin. Do you see the difference between that and Big 12 winning percentage?
Quote from: bMWHjawk on March 10, 2009, 01:39:18 PMJank recruited approximately half of the players that played in championships with ku and Illinois. Where are you getting the idea that he can't recruit? Martin would be nothing without Delonte. . . K-State's 08 recruiting class was the worst in the Big 12. Name the best player that has been recruited to any team he has been the head coach of....
Jank is recruiting to Illinois State. Why would his class be better than K-State's? That's kind of the whole point, isn't it? If Jank was at a Big 12 program he could bring in the top talent, just like he did at ku.
Recruiting to Kansas is not hard. I could recruit to ku. They have the name and national media doing your recruiting. I don't give anyone other than that credit for getting good recruits to kansas.
Quote from: jthutch on March 10, 2009, 03:44:02 PMRecruiting to Kansas is not hard. I could recruit to ku. They have the name and national media doing your recruiting. I don't give anyone other than that credit for getting good recruits to kansas.i don't entirely agree. you have to recruit everywhere. even at unc or duke.i do think self is pretty hands on as a recruiter. some head coaches are, some aren't. the mere fact that self is willing to carry manning (has manning ever gotten a player?) tells you a lot about how that staff divides the recruiting workload.
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2009, 03:54:09 PMQuote from: jthutch on March 10, 2009, 03:44:02 PMRecruiting to Kansas is not hard. I could recruit to ku. They have the name and national media doing your recruiting. I don't give anyone other than that credit for getting good recruits to kansas.i don't entirely agree. you have to recruit everywhere. even at unc or duke.i do think self is pretty hands on as a recruiter. some head coaches are, some aren't. the mere fact that self is willing to carry manning (has manning ever gotten a player?) tells you a lot about how that staff divides the recruiting workload.True, but at certain schools you are automatically on the short list of most major recruits. You do have to recruit directly against other elite level schools, but bringing in a top 25 class to a uk, UNC, Duke, etc is pretty much a forgone conclusion every year, no matter who is doing the recruiting. Even if you miss on your primary target (top 20 type dudes) your second, third, or even fourth options are still going to be top 150 type guys. Hell, dudes like Teahan walk on to uk, when they could have definitely received a schollie from many other decent teams.
Quote from: JTKSU on March 10, 2009, 04:11:00 PMQuote from: sys on March 10, 2009, 03:54:09 PMQuote from: jthutch on March 10, 2009, 03:44:02 PMRecruiting to Kansas is not hard. I could recruit to ku. They have the name and national media doing your recruiting. I don't give anyone other than that credit for getting good recruits to kansas.i don't entirely agree. you have to recruit everywhere. even at unc or duke.i do think self is pretty hands on as a recruiter. some head coaches are, some aren't. the mere fact that self is willing to carry manning (has manning ever gotten a player?) tells you a lot about how that staff divides the recruiting workload.True, but at certain schools you are automatically on the short list of most major recruits. You do have to recruit directly against other elite level schools, but bringing in a top 25 class to a uk, UNC, Duke, etc is pretty much a forgone conclusion every year, no matter who is doing the recruiting. Even if you miss on your primary target (top 20 type dudes) your second, third, or even fourth options are still going to be top 150 type guys. Hell, dudes like Teahan walk on to uk, when they could have definitely received a schollie from many other decent teams.Not true. Roy had quite a few unranked classes, and lost a lot of high profile recruiting battles. Self has obviously lost a lot of high profile battles the last three years, too.
Don't worry, when Delonte's pipeline dries up, and Frank is fired, Jank might still be available.
Enjoy the NIT.
Quote from: bMWHjawk on January 22, 2009, 08:10:46 PMThis post has to be a joke, because (1) Tyshawn Taylor makes your guards look like trash [please rewatch ku/K-State game], and (2) because you don't need 6 elite players in one recruiting class in order for it to be a good class. Aldrich is playing like an All-American and both Morningstar and Reed have provided some great minutes this season. Add a couple 5-stars to the mix next season and that team will be Final Four material.taylor is like ku's version of '07-'08 pullen. fans like him because they expected nothing and he can run up and down the court without falling down (strange how pullen lost the ability to do that this year). in reality, he's done nothing.no one needs elite players. if ku just wants to be the best of the nortards, then by all means, classes like '08 are the way to go.lol @ ku in the final four next year btw. stupider than the ksutards that thought ksu had a shot @ the tourney this year.
This post has to be a joke, because (1) Tyshawn Taylor makes your guards look like trash [please rewatch ku/K-State game], and (2) because you don't need 6 elite players in one recruiting class in order for it to be a good class. Aldrich is playing like an All-American and both Morningstar and Reed have provided some great minutes this season. Add a couple 5-stars to the mix next season and that team will be Final Four material.
What did I miss? Why is bentard melting down tonight?