Date: 20/08/25 - 00:16 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.  (Read 1481 times)

September 24, 2006, 12:04:43 PM
Read 1481 times

michigancat

  • All American
  • Offline
  • ******
  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Would it still be the best in the Big XII?
Logged
September 24, 2006, 12:10:19 PM
Reply #1

ds43fan

  • Guest
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
those back ups weren't like our backups they were good
Logged
September 24, 2006, 12:36:25 PM
Reply #2

jmlynch1

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • ***
  • 2986
  • Personal Text
    Not A Basketball Player
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
There line is what makes there offense. They just dwarfed our guys.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 01:11:11 PM
Reply #3

waks

  • Second String Wildcat
  • Offline
  • ****
  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: jmlynch1 on September 24, 2006, 12:36:25 PM
There line is what makes there offense. They just dwarfed our guys.
not to mention they still had the recieving core that Brohm had. The team that we just lost to, outscored Miami when Cantwell went in..
Logged
September 24, 2006, 01:30:53 PM
Reply #4

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Their quarterback wasn't overly impressive, but our defense had a lot to do with it.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 01:49:19 PM
Reply #5

Skycat

  • Cub
  • Offline
  • 2129
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 01:30:53 PM
Their quarterback wasn't overly impressive, but our defense had a lot to do with it.

Start listing the Big XII QBs that are better.

Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:02:06 PM
Reply #6

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: Skycat on September 24, 2006, 01:49:19 PM
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 01:30:53 PM
Their quarterback wasn't overly impressive, but our defense had a lot to do with it.

Start listing the Big XII QBs that are better.



Meyer and Taylor

McCoy and Daniel maybe.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:25:27 PM
Reply #7

waks

  • Second String Wildcat
  • Offline
  • ****
  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 04:02:06 PM
Quote from: Skycat on September 24, 2006, 01:49:19 PM
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 01:30:53 PM
Their quarterback wasn't overly impressive, but our defense had a lot to do with it.

Start listing the Big XII QBs that are better.



Meyer and Taylor

McCoy and Daniel maybe.
Meyer who? Taylor, no.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:39:36 PM
Reply #8

greasd up deaf guy

  • Guest
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
ISU's qb, waks.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:40:02 PM
Reply #9

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
The only starting QB in the big 12 spelled M-E-Y-E-R.


Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:41:44 PM
Reply #10

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
And if I was a coach I would take Paul Thompson ahead of Cantwell, too.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:56:26 PM
Reply #11

waks

  • Second String Wildcat
  • Offline
  • ****
  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 04:40:02 PM
The only starting QB in the big 12 spelled M-E-Y-E-R.



yeah and I'm saying Cantwell would start over him. Cantwell = God.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 04:57:35 PM
Reply #12

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: waks on September 24, 2006, 04:56:26 PM
yeah and I'm saying Cantwell would start over him.

ok.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 05:32:58 PM
Reply #13

waks

  • Second String Wildcat
  • Offline
  • ****
  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 04:57:35 PM
Quote from: waks on September 24, 2006, 04:56:26 PM
yeah and I'm saying Cantwell would start over him.

ok.
you didn't respond to my equation...

"Cantwell = God."
Logged
September 24, 2006, 07:41:26 PM
Reply #14

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: waks on September 24, 2006, 05:32:58 PM


"Cantwell = God."

I'd have to disagree, respectfully.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 07:48:08 PM
Reply #15

waks

  • Second String Wildcat
  • Offline
  • ****
  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
well atleast you were respectful about it.
Logged
September 24, 2006, 08:00:49 PM
Reply #16

ds43fan

  • Guest
Re: Louisville's offense without Bush or Brohm.
Quote from: PoetWarrior on September 24, 2006, 07:41:26 PM
Quote from: waks on September 24, 2006, 05:32:58 PM


"Cantwell = God."

I'd have to disagree, respectfully.
classy :baitno: whats wrong with you man??? we dissagree classlessly freeman is better than cantwell..as soon as prince lets him develop in big 12 play..
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »