Don't be fooled wisconsin is really talented

[fatty fat fat]

6 top 100 rivals kids.

many top 50.

[cireksu]

how many do we have?  3?

[BostonPancake]

Not fooled here.  You don't just go 30-4 without being really good (even if you are in the big 10).

[sys]

how many do we have?  3?

yes.  same as last year, btw.

so frustrating when random people call ksu "talented" or say that ksu has "lots of talent".

[yosh]

6 Jason Bennetts?

[chum1]

Michael Beasley has lots of talent.  Therefore, KSU has lots of talent.  There's nothing wrong with that.

[yosh]

how many do we have?  3?

yes.  same as last year, btw.

so frustrating when random people call ksu "talented" or say that ksu has "lots of talent".

We start two 5 stars, two 4 stars and a rivals 150.  That's better than 90+% of DI teams can claim.  

[AzCat]

We start two 5 stars, two 4 stars and a rivals 150.  That's better than 90+% of DI teams can claim.  

Which would be a more impressive number if 84% of DI teams didn't spend this part of March watching from home.   

[cireksu]

how many do we have?  3?

yes.  same as last year, btw.

so frustrating when random people call ksu "talented" or say that ksu has "lots of talent".

yeah but beas=2-3 generic top 100 players.  Walker = 1.5 generic top 100 players.

[sys]

Michael Beasley has lots of talent.  Therefore, KSU has lots of talent.  There's nothing wrong with that.

beasley's talent/beasley = incredible quantity of talent

beasley's talent + rest of the team's talent/13 players = not lots of talent

[cireksu]

pullen is playing borderline top 100.  Think about him vs. sutton.

[sys]

beas=2-3 generic top 100 players.  Walker = 1.5 generic top 100 players.

maybe, questionable.

i'd say 5-6 top 50s > 2 top 10s
5-6 50-100s < 2 top 10s, but really close to a tossup.

[cireksu]

The bad feeling about this game that I have is that we won't outrebound them and could get outrebounded pretty soundly.

[doom]

I feel better about it than I did vs. USC only because they showed they could do it.