@ OU, or aTm at home

[fatty fat fat]

which did you feel better about winning?

[SCHITZ]

aTm, Turd sucks at coaching

[blackman-era-front-rower]

honestly... didn't think we had a real shot at either... you guys bring a whole lotta "doom" down on aTm saturday and maybe we'll have both (and more)

hope we continue the intensity throughout the big12!

 

[cireksu]

A&M but only bc there will be lots of fb recruits there.

[steve dave]

OU, road win was huge

[WILDCAT NATION]

Going in, I would have guessed KSU would have a much better shot at winning vs. ATM.

I'd love to see KSU figure out how to shoot like that all the time...and then figure out Defense.

[doom]

I think OU, just because it was a solid road win, but A&M would be a marque top 10.  They almost equal each other on the resume.  Actually the A&M win could be better.

[Legore]

I felt better about winning vs. A&M, I didn't like this young team's chances against a good team on the road especially after Xavier.  That said the A&M game will look better on our resume because they are a lock for the tourney and a top ten team.  With the game in Manhattan I think it's about a stone cold toss up.  Coming in I was just hoping we could start 1-1 but hey why not shoot for 2-0.  If we beat A&M we'll have to screw up pretty bad the rest of the way not to make the tourney. 

[AzCat]

Tough call but I'd go with A&M but only because it's at home, I too didn't care for the chances of a very young Wildcat team on the road.  But they're clearly improving rather quickly.

[dmartin]

we'll have to screw up pretty bad the rest of the way not to make the tourney. 

Sounds like something Pervis Pasco would say.

[McGrowlTowelZac]

I liked our chances vs. A&M because I think we are going to be tough at home.  The Bram should be rocking next week(assuming there isn't another ice storm around gametime), it will be tough all the same.  If we win against A&M, I am going to start to get really excited,  .

[cas]

I'd go with A&M, I assume that they will be in the top 10 or 15 by the end of the season, and a win against them would provide us with a "signature win" that we apparently lacked last year. (@ Texas!! WTF)

[bigDcat]

atm would be a great win because they are in the top 10 giving us a victory over a marque team most teams won't have come march, but ou gives us a much needed road win since we didnt play a true road game in the non conference...the selection committee will definitely frown on us if we don't have a quality road win

[feralchat]

It's kind of a moot point, since we already have the win over OU.
As important as the win at Norman was in getting the team off to a good conference start, a AM victory would give notice to visiting teams that Bramlage is no place to go hunting a win.

[doom]

It's kind of a moot point, since we already have the win over OU.
As important as the win at Norman was in getting the team off to a good conference start, a AM victory would give notice to visiting teams that Bramlage is no place to go hunting a win.

I don't want teams ready for the beating.

[CrushNasty]

It's kind of a moot point, since we already have the win over OU.
As important as the win at Norman was in getting the team off to a good conference start, a AM victory would give notice to visiting teams that Bramlage is no place to go hunting a win.

I don't want teams ready for the beating.

Alright, we'll just lose on purpose.

[doom]

It's kind of a moot point, since we already have the win over OU.
As important as the win at Norman was in getting the team off to a good conference start, a AM victory would give notice to visiting teams that Bramlage is no place to go hunting a win.

I don't want teams ready for the beating.

Alright, we'll just lose on purpose.

That's exactly what I said.  Lern too reede.

[CrushNasty]

It's kind of a moot point, since we already have the win over OU.
As important as the win at Norman was in getting the team off to a good conference start, a AM victory would give notice to visiting teams that Bramlage is no place to go hunting a win.

I don't want teams ready for the beating.

Alright, we'll just lose on purpose.

That's exactly what I said.  Lern too reede.

Well we have to win for teams pay attention to us and be ready to come to the Bram... you don't want teams to be ready... sooo so it sounds like you want us, sorry K-State, to lose.  And what was that last sentence? it was hard to read.

[jaloma58]

It's kind of a moot point, since we already have the win over OU.
As important as the win at Norman was in getting the team off to a good conference start, a AM victory would give notice to visiting teams that Bramlage is no place to go hunting a win.

I like that! 

[Leyton]

Prior to the OU game, I would have said that a win @ OU would be more difficult to come by than a home win over A&M.  I think that a win over A&M will do more for us in terms of exposure and making a case for the NCAA tourney, though.

[WildGunman]

A win over aTm will certainly make more of a splash with the national media, although the selection commitee might look at it with about the same weight as @ OU since they probably actually watch the games.  The biggest factor in their thinking might be what OU and aTm do from here on out.

Beforehand, I would have said @ OU would be the harder task.  Even Wooly's teams knocked out some highly ranked teams in the Bram.  However, now that we have the OU win, I think I am a little more worried about the aTm game than I would have been.  I am curious to see how this team handles a little success.