I hate to say this..

[KSt8er]

Every Man A Jayhawk!

Holy balls that is frackin hilarious.  I'm printing some out and taking them over to watch the game with a uk tard.  

Mangina will run a lot of misdirection and draws, thus negating the speed of VT.  ku wins in a blowout, no doubt.  Reesing and Sharpe will both be frontrunners for the heisman.  

[pissclams]

[steve dave]

this thread is funny.

Way to go support your team in the biggest game in their history! (< Jan. 5th vs. BC!) 

[sonofdaxjones]

oneupon surprises me, I figured with his vast wealth he'd have flown the Gulfstream down to Miami to be at the game.

Go Hawks . . . win one so we can have the Mangino Bidet exclusively at Home Depot.

[pissclams]

ttt


(GO HAWKS!)

[chum1]

Why are there four items in the HAWKPAK and three in the KATPAK?  I don't know why, but I am very concerned about this.

[pissclams]

Why are there four items in the HAWKPAK and three in the KATPAK?  I don't know why, but I am very concerned about this.

look again iChum1

[ksuno1stunner]

 

[chum1]

Phew.  That's a relief.

[pissclams]

Question:  Who here loves them HAWKS?

Answer: Duh. We do!  ROCK CHALK BEAK!

[pissclams]

Kill Hokey!

[pissclams]

Note to Mangino + Hawk players:
Pretend V Tech Coach + players are Saddam's hide out.

Incoming!  HOOOO!!!!

[steve dave]

Note to Mangino + Hawk players:
Pretend V Tech Coach + players are Saddam's hide out.

Incoming!  HOOOO!!!!

LOL

[pissclams]

DO NOT DISTURB!

[ksu_FAN]

[sonofdaxjones]

Bear with me now as this is really complicated:

Rock-Chalk Jayhawk k u

Rock-Chalk Jayhawk k u

Rock-Chalk Jayhawk k u

Rock Chalk Jayhawk k u

[WilliamTheWildcat]

Win it for Pepper Rogers!!!!










(bmw... that's the name of the last coach to lead ku to the orange Bowl. He was the original JoPawks of the midwest)

[WilliesToeNail]

I see that even with todays advanced gaming consoles, there is not nearly enough computing power to accurately render the true size and girth of the Mangina.

[PCR]

YESSSSSS!  GET 'EM 'WKs!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nice optical illusion there.  They had Daddy Mangino stand 20 feet behind the rest of his family.  Thanks for making me look fat DAD!

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

Does this mean that ku, win or lose, deserved to be there?

According to you they should win, so they obviously do.

Just curious.

[mjrod]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


I'm saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


We're saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

So they are your pick to win the BCS game but didn't deserve to be there.

If a conference could have more than 2 teams in BCS games, maybe Mizzou wouldnt' have had to be the odd man out.

[mjrod]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


We're saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

So they are your pick to win the BCS game but didn't deserve to be there.

If a conference could have more than 2 teams in BCS games, maybe Mizzou wouldnt' have had to be the odd man out.

They are my pick to win the game they did not deserve to be in.   I think everyone agrees with me.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


We're saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

So they are your pick to win the BCS game but didn't deserve to be there.

If a conference could have more than 2 teams in BCS games, maybe Mizzou wouldnt' have had to be the odd man out.

They are my pick to win the game they did not deserve to be in.   I think everyone agrees with me.

Dumb.

[Ghost of Stan Parrish]

I've heard of dogs that get so fat their eyes get covered by fat rolls, so they have to have an operation.  This is sad.  Just sad.

Oh yeah, beak 'em!   

[mjrod]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


We're saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

So they are your pick to win the BCS game but didn't deserve to be there.

If a conference could have more than 2 teams in BCS games, maybe Mizzou wouldnt' have had to be the odd man out.

They are my pick to win the game they did not deserve to be in.   I think everyone agrees with me.

Dumb.

Well, yes you are.

You come up here to try and make the inevitable diversion with a meaningless point.

No one believes ku should be in a BCS bowl outside the couple hundred ku football fans and various high schoolers in Lawrence.   VaTech won the right to be in a bowl because they are the ACC champ.   Does that mean you deserve to be in there?

ku didn't win their division.   Missouri, DID and beat ku.   Missouri is a Top 10 team.  They should have been there and demonstrated they were a BCS team.

The fact that ku is in the BCS doesn't mean they deserve it.    They were chosen, right or wrong, but many pundits and others have said otherwise.   If ku beats VT (and I think they can because the ACC is a crap conference anyway) that doesn't validate that ku should be there.   It's not that complicated, and I typed this slow so you can understand it, but I'm pretty sure you won't, but hey, I gave it a shot.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


We're saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

So they are your pick to win the BCS game but didn't deserve to be there.

If a conference could have more than 2 teams in BCS games, maybe Mizzou wouldnt' have had to be the odd man out.

They are my pick to win the game they did not deserve to be in.   I think everyone agrees with me.

Dumb.

Well, yes you are.

You come up here to try and make the inevitable diversion with a meaningless point.

No one believes ku should be in a BCS bowl outside the couple hundred ku football fans and various high schoolers in Lawrence.   VaTech won the right to be in a bowl because they are the ACC champ.   Does that mean you deserve to be in there?

ku didn't win their division.   Missouri, DID and beat ku.   Missouri is a Top 10 team.  They should have been there and demonstrated they were a BCS team.

The fact that ku is in the BCS doesn't mean they deserve it.    They were chosen, right or wrong, but many pundits and others have said otherwise.   If ku beats VT (and I think they can because the ACC is a crap conference anyway) that doesn't validate that ku should be there.   It's not that complicated, and I typed this slow so you can understand it, but I'm pretty sure you won't, but hey, I gave it a shot.

So VT deserves to be there because they are the ACC champ but a ku team that you believe should defeat that ACC champ doesn't deserve it?

That doesn't make any sense. Your beef should be with automatic bids and not with ku.

You're dumb.

[mjrod]

No, that's not what anyone said and for you to try and make that statement shows very low FBIQ on your part.


We're saying that ku will beat VT.   That doesn't mean they deserve to be there.  Missouri DESERVED to be there in your place.   It's debatable whether ku deserved it over Hawaii.

So they are your pick to win the BCS game but didn't deserve to be there.

If a conference could have more than 2 teams in BCS games, maybe Mizzou wouldnt' have had to be the odd man out.

They are my pick to win the game they did not deserve to be in.   I think everyone agrees with me.

Dumb.

Well, yes you are.

You come up here to try and make the inevitable diversion with a meaningless point.

No one believes ku should be in a BCS bowl outside the couple hundred ku football fans and various high schoolers in Lawrence.   VaTech won the right to be in a bowl because they are the ACC champ.   Does that mean you deserve to be in there?

ku didn't win their division.   Missouri, DID and beat ku.   Missouri is a Top 10 team.  They should have been there and demonstrated they were a BCS team.

The fact that ku is in the BCS doesn't mean they deserve it.    They were chosen, right or wrong, but many pundits and others have said otherwise.   If ku beats VT (and I think they can because the ACC is a crap conference anyway) that doesn't validate that ku should be there.   It's not that complicated, and I typed this slow so you can understand it, but I'm pretty sure you won't, but hey, I gave it a shot.

So VT deserves to be there because they are the ACC champ but a ku team that you believe should defeat that ACC champ doesn't deserve it?

That doesn't make any sense. Your beef should be with automatic bids and not with ku.

You're dumb.

Yes, you're now really becoming an idiot.

Remember, part of being in the BCS is to win your conference.   That's all they had to do, something you didn't.  You didn't even win your division.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

The BCS provides automatic bids to teams that win their conference.

But they leave room open to allow teams in that they think deserve it that did not win their conference.

If the BCS had no other bids but automatic bids than you would be correct.

[mjrod]

I was not making any claim other than you didn't deserve to be there, and that my prediction you would win does nothing to support your claim you deserve to be there.

It's two different issues.