Date: 29/07/25 - 09:17 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Is ku just THAT lucky or CU just THAT bad??  (Read 3349 times)

October 20, 2007, 10:15:43 PM
Reply #30

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
Three reasons ku needs to enjoy this season

1. OU
2. Texas
3. Texas Tech

 :popcorn:

BINGO!

and there are four more

4. aTm usually a power in the south - lame duck coach
5. NU is a festering, pussy mess
6. OSU has no defense*
7. ISU at home

*but then again, tonight we had no defense either.

October 21, 2007, 10:34:22 AM
Reply #31

scoopeloo

  • Guest
ku is still playing with all 22 of their original starters and they have not lost in turnover margin yet.  I believe they are truly charmed this year.  That is, until they meet Mizzou in KC.

October 21, 2007, 12:43:32 PM
Reply #32

catdude33

  • Guest
Hey, we won our two road games with our C- effort.   :twobirds:

LOL.  You seriously don't realize that those are the only two D1 caliber football teams you've played this year, do you?  It wasn't a C- effort, you're honestly just not that great.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2007, 02:06:01 PM by catdude33 »

October 21, 2007, 01:05:05 PM
Reply #33

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Three reasons ku needs to enjoy this season

1. OU
2. Texas
3. Texas Tech

 :popcorn:

ku plays all 3 next year

October 21, 2007, 08:03:09 PM
Reply #34

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Oklahoma couldn't get a win in Boulder.  You clowns are still in denial about ku?  Wow... I thought maybe the 30-24 road win in Manhattan might have convinced you people.   

Hey, we won our two road games with our C- effort.   :twobirds:

LOL.  You seriously don't realize that those are the only two D1 caliber football teams you've played this year, do you?  It wasn't a C- effort, you're honestly just not that great.


ku played average against both K-State and Colorado.  ku has the potential to play much better and will just continue to improve as the season goes along.  Winning on the road in Manhattan and Boulder are not easy, and like it or not, ku has only played one D-1AA team this year, just like K-State.  Honestly, put the schedule talk to rest.  ku has taken care of business and its time for you idiots to admit it.



October 21, 2007, 08:06:40 PM
Reply #35

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.

2007 season:

ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3

that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 21, 2007, 08:25:30 PM
Reply #36

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
I love that Reesing has led his team to a 7-0 record and a #9 ranking in the BCS standings.


October 21, 2007, 08:26:14 PM
Reply #37

ECN

  • Classless Cat
  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 12184
well, i for one am done bashing. its surprised the F outta me.
We all know there's been a conspiracy. Only the failures have been recorded.
We all pay too much attention to Icarus, and not enough to his father.

October 21, 2007, 08:27:09 PM
Reply #38

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.

2007 season:

ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3

that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.

We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.

Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.

October 21, 2007, 08:27:45 PM
Reply #39

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Quote
Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.


qft, it's disgusting really.  :yuck:
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 21, 2007, 08:32:18 PM
Reply #40

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.

2007 season:

ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3

that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.

We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.

Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.

Not at all.  You lose your only good receiver and your best running back along with several key players on defense.  K-State might be in rebuilding mode next season.

October 21, 2007, 08:33:47 PM
Reply #41

Wickedson

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 43
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.

2007 season:

ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3

that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.

We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.

Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.


LOLZ..


October 21, 2007, 08:55:53 PM
Reply #43

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.

2007 season:

ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3

that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.

We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.

Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.

Not at all.  You lose your only good receiver and your best running back along with several key players on defense.  K-State might be in rebuilding mode next season.

We lost Yamon and Jermaine and seem to be doing fine now.  And losing Johnson isn't a huge loss, everyone knows what Patton is capable of (youtube).

October 21, 2007, 09:06:58 PM
Reply #44

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT

Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT

October 21, 2007, 09:08:46 PM
Reply #45

Wickedson

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 43
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT

Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT



So you'd rather have Freeman than Reesing?  interesting.

October 21, 2007, 09:09:22 PM
Reply #46

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT

Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT



So you'd rather have Freeman than Reesing?  interesting.

 :lol:

October 21, 2007, 09:09:33 PM
Reply #47

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Reesing (7-0, 3-0)

Freeman (4-3, 2-2)

October 21, 2007, 09:10:16 PM
Reply #48

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Reesing (7-0, 3-0)

Freeman (4-3, 2-2)

Prince (11-9 6-6)

Mangino (Irrelevant, 14-29)

It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 21, 2007, 09:15:15 PM
Reply #49

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest

Prince (11-9 6-6)

Mangino (Irrelevant, 14-29)


Has Mangino seriously lost double the games he's won?  :eek:

October 21, 2007, 09:15:53 PM
Reply #50

The Whale

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 850
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT

Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT



So you'd rather have Freeman than Reesing?  interesting.

Are all brand new ku football fans this retarded?

October 21, 2007, 09:23:13 PM
Reply #51

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Reesing (7-0, 3-0)

Freeman (4-3, 2-2)

At least we got the better quarterback.  There's no turning back from this point (as I will illustrate in a graph).  Now we just need to work on that defensive line, and we'll be golden.

October 21, 2007, 09:25:37 PM
Reply #52

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest


It seems we are finally past the intersection point.

Freeman's better than Reesing, it happens, but that's just what potential is all about.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2007, 09:28:09 PM by ksuno1stunner »

October 21, 2007, 09:33:12 PM
Reply #53

GoldbrickGangBoss

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2590
  • Personal Text
    THE b IS NOT CAPITALIZED
You'll be whining about Freeman's potential well into his senior year.

Might take a while to even out his int/td gap. That is, assuming he doesn't lengthen it as opposed to thinning it.
I'm telling you, this is not ANYTHING like the team from the beginning of conference play. You will see no more blowouts like what happened in OOC.  If we lose, it will not because these kids gave up, and it will be at the buzzer. -Rodless, before 97-70

October 21, 2007, 10:17:12 PM
Reply #54

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
K-State fans desperately seeking for moral victories any way they can find them.  It looks like the Josh Freeman circle jerk is back in full force. 

October 21, 2007, 10:27:12 PM
Reply #55

The Whale

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 850
In 2006, ku fans were desperately seeking for moral victories any way they could find them. 


FYP

October 21, 2007, 10:28:58 PM
Reply #56

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
2006???

The same year the Jayhawks beat K-State 39-20?   

October 21, 2007, 10:30:22 PM
Reply #57

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 21, 2007, 10:32:33 PM
Reply #58

berford

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 361
A lot of both, IMHO. More luck - neither OU or UT on their schedule this year...

aTm, OSU and misery loom ahead for them. Expect much of that luck to run out.

 :ksu:
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist. -- C. S. Lewis (quoted in the movie, The Usual Suspects)

October 21, 2007, 11:53:18 PM
Reply #59

Sandman

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 377
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT

Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT


You think this is definitive?  So Freeman averages a whopping .3 more yards per attempt while being equal in TDs despite throwing 69 more passes and having Jordy Nelson on his team.  We also run the ball (successfully at that), therefore no need for Reesing to air it up constantly.  But hang your hat on that .3.

And Reesing is 7-0 compared to Freeman's 4-3.  And that's what everyone here told me what mattered in comparing Meier's and Freeman's stats from last year.  But since we're switching Reesing with Meier that logic no longer stands, correct?