What's the better scenario:
A. Having a commit from a kid early, and then the heavy weights put the pressure on late in the recruiting year.
B. Showing up at the same time, or after, the heavyweights put on the pressure and offering at the same time....or later
or C. Having a kid commit early that no one else in D1 wants, taking a scholly from a marginal B12 prospect.
What Info do you have that leads you to believe that no other D1 school wants these kids?
The same info you have that leads you to believe that "heavyweights" will want these kids down the road.
Jesus.
Actually, I think I've made it very clear that my opinion is it's just as likely that "heavyweights" will be on these kids as it is that these kids will be a bust...
The point I'm trying to make is that NO ONE KNOWS IF THEY WILL OR IF THEY WON’T BE SUPERSTARS OR BUSTS. I'm not arguing that this is the right thing or the wrong thing. I'm arguing that making such bold statements as: Why are we picking up these losers? Is just as stupid as saying: These one star kids could turn out to be the next Terrance Newman!
I AM TRYING TO SAY THAT ARGUEING ABOUT THIS IS STUPID AS WE ARE ALL BASING OUR BELIEFES ON INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
I've shown that Top tier programs are getting just as many commits from "UNKNOWN" recruits as us.
I've shown that ranking players at this point in time is based off of incomplete information.
I don't think I can spell it out for anyone any clearer than this: WORRYING ABOUT THIS AT THIS POINT IN TIME IS PREMATURE.