Date: 27/08/25 - 16:06 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Who are Martin and Hill tied to for next year?  (Read 1781 times)

April 10, 2007, 09:59:10 AM
Read 1781 times

Jayhox

  • Guest
There has been a ton of talk about getting a couple more players in this class.  What about next year?  Do Martin and hill have anyone seriously considering K-State is a lock for 5 star status?

April 10, 2007, 10:01:43 AM
Reply #1

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Lock for 5 star?  The bar has been raised.

April 10, 2007, 10:05:33 AM
Reply #2

Jayhox

  • Guest
I'm serious.  4 stars are more often misses than hits when it comes to being truly great players that carry programs.  The 5 stars are generally locks to be impact players, which is what your new staff will need after next year.

April 10, 2007, 10:07:09 AM
Reply #3

konofo

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 992
The 5 stars are generally locks to be impact players.

Whatever you say, champ.

Sincerely,
Jason Bennett

April 10, 2007, 10:08:33 AM
Reply #4

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Thank God for Brown, Sutton and Pullen. We would be 2-14 in 08-09 w/o them.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

April 10, 2007, 10:10:17 AM
Reply #5

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
The 5 stars are generally locks to be impact players.

Whatever you say, champ.

Sincerely,
Jason Bennett

LMFAO  :lol:
<---------Click the ball

April 10, 2007, 10:10:45 AM
Reply #6

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
Martin is recruiting Kadji, though he is only ****.  

April 10, 2007, 10:11:14 AM
Reply #7

Jayhox

  • Guest
I am serious.  Who are you guys on for future classes?  I honestly don't know.  I recall someone saying before the Huggy thing came up that your top prospect was predicted to be a 4 star and that the others were 3 stars at best.  Was that wrong?

April 10, 2007, 10:11:54 AM
Reply #8

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
I am serious.  Who are you guys on for future classes?  I honestly don't know.  I recall someone saying before the Huggy thing came up that your top prospect was predicted to be a 4 star and that the others were 3 stars at best.  Was that wrong?

Who knows now?
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

April 10, 2007, 10:15:18 AM
Reply #9

Jayhox

  • Guest
OK, fair enough.  That is all I was asking.

April 10, 2007, 10:17:12 AM
Reply #10

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Name me the 5* locks for ku right now.

April 10, 2007, 10:17:32 AM
Reply #11

yosh

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3071
We honestly don't know yet...We've been linked to a handful of 5-star players, but it's too early to know how serious it is, or if Huggins being gone will change the status with these guys.  It's way too early for anyone to give an educated answer to that question.
Cada hombre un gato salvaje!

April 10, 2007, 10:24:46 AM
Reply #12

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
With Martin running the show and Hill as an assistant we're only going to be able to get 4* players.  We've been such an elite program for so long, I can't believe we're lowering ourselves to these types of players.  :'(

April 10, 2007, 10:27:03 AM
Reply #13

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
I am serious.  Who are you guys on for future classes?  I honestly don't know.  I recall someone saying before the Huggy thing came up that your top prospect was predicted to be a 4 star and that the others were 3 stars at best.  Was that wrong?

Kadji, Shipman, Witherspoon, Swopshire, and Woods are all 4 stars.  There were other 4 stars, and a couple 5 stars KSU was in on, but I only included the ones with clear connections to Hill or Martin.

April 10, 2007, 10:40:03 AM
Reply #14

j-vonfeldt

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8829
Here ya go, this is our current list for next year but who we are still tied to, I'm not sure anyone knows...




April 10, 2007, 11:07:58 AM
Reply #15

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

April 10, 2007, 11:11:19 AM
Reply #16

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

I think we'll see.  It all depends on how the team does next season and how Beasley and Walker do in the draft.

IMO, it says something about their abilities when none of them want to leave with Huggins out of the picture.  Maybe Weiser just scared them into staying with his LOI threats...I don't know.

April 10, 2007, 11:14:06 AM
Reply #17

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

Disappointed compared to what?  Asbury recruiting?  Wooly recruiting?  I wish people would quit acting like our program has just been raking in the McD's AA over the past 20 years.  If all we end up with are 4* and 3* players with a 5* every other year, count me as not disappointed. 

Yeah, in comparison to what we thought we'd have if Huggins was the coach, it will probably be a drop off.  How much, who knows?

April 10, 2007, 11:16:32 AM
Reply #18

chum1

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6944
One factor to keep in mind is that Huggins very well may never have had a top ten class again - maybe not even a top twenty.  We all know why this year's class is #1.

April 10, 2007, 11:18:08 AM
Reply #19

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

Disappointed compared to what?  Asbury recruiting?  Wooly recruiting?  I wish people would quit acting like our program has just been raking in the McD's AA over the past 20 years.  If all we end up with are 4* and 3* players with a 5* every other year, count me as not disappointed. 

Yeah, in comparison to what we thought we'd have if Huggins was the coach, it will probably be a drop off.  How much, who knows?

I will be very happy if that is how our recruiting classes turn out.  I think that is what Huggin's classes would look like as well had he stayed.  This one was huge because he had been working on it for so long.  I don't see the future of our recruiting looking as rosy but it won't be as bad as the Wooly/Asbury years.  
<---------Click the ball

April 10, 2007, 11:21:27 AM
Reply #20

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

I think we'll see.  It all depends on how the team does next season and how Beasley and Walker do in the draft.


i very much agree.  beasley/walker will pretty much make or break martin/hill over the next year or two.

there have been other youthful "recruiters" that have ridden a star player to become national players in recruiting.

"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

April 10, 2007, 11:24:49 AM
Reply #21

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

Disappointed compared to what?  Asbury recruiting?  Wooly recruiting?  I wish people would quit acting like our program has just been raking in the McD's AA over the past 20 years.  If all we end up with are 4* and 3* players with a 5* every other year, count me as not disappointed. 

Yeah, in comparison to what we thought we'd have if Huggins was the coach, it will probably be a drop off.  How much, who knows?

Great point.  I think people would have been disappointed in Huggins recruiting if he had stayed.  They'd expect GRCOAT year in and year out, which all rational people knew wasn't going to happen.

April 10, 2007, 11:28:51 AM
Reply #22

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

Disappointed compared to what?  Asbury recruiting?  Wooly recruiting?  I wish people would quit acting like our program has just been raking in the McD's AA over the past 20 years.  If all we end up with are 4* and 3* players with a 5* every other year, count me as not disappointed. 

Yeah, in comparison to what we thought we'd have if Huggins was the coach, it will probably be a drop off.  How much, who knows?

Did we hire a pair of coachs or recruiters?   
All of the talk is that we hired Martin and Hill, two well known recruiters to salvage this year's class and take us forward, and they will be able to take us forward because of their remarkable recruiting ability.  My point is that they won't be recruiting crap past next year.  Look what happened to our Spring late signers we had lined up in Martin and Evans.  Both have already moved on.  As close to KSU as both were, and supposedly having been recruited by our top recruiters, they've already shifted their focus away from K-State sans Huggins.  Simply put Hill nor Martin have deep enough connections to land anyone on the current 2008 radar-



Sorry if that hurts your feelings.  We'd be doing great to land 3* 4* talent going forward, ain't gonna happen.

Comparing Bozeman to Martin/Hill needs to cease.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

April 10, 2007, 11:30:09 AM
Reply #23

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

April 10, 2007, 11:36:10 AM
Reply #24

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Clearly the best choice would have been to hire another coach who couldn't pull in good recruits in the future and then completely wipe out any and all chance of keeping next year's class. 

April 10, 2007, 11:36:40 AM
Reply #25

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

Disappointed compared to what?  Asbury recruiting?  Wooly recruiting?  I wish people would quit acting like our program has just been raking in the McD's AA over the past 20 years.  If all we end up with are 4* and 3* players with a 5* every other year, count me as not disappointed. 

Yeah, in comparison to what we thought we'd have if Huggins was the coach, it will probably be a drop off.  How much, who knows?

Did we hire a pair of coachs or recruiters?   
All of the talk is that we hired Martin and Hill, two well known recruiters to salvage this year's class and take us forward, and they will be able to take us forward because of their remarkable recruiting ability.  My point is that they won't be recruiting **($ past next year.  Look what happened to our Spring late signers we had lined up in Martin and Evans.  Both have already moved on.  As close to KSU as both were, and supposedly having been recruited by our top recruiters, they've already shifted their focus away from K-State sans Huggins.  Simply put Hill nor Martin have deep enough connections to land anyone on the current 2008 radar-

Are you saying Martin and Hill won't be able to recruit because of Tyree Evans?

I'll go ahead and see how things play out before I emphatically declare that we won't be able to land 3 star players.

April 10, 2007, 11:39:31 AM
Reply #26

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
We have room for an assistant I believe.

April 10, 2007, 11:41:54 AM
Reply #27

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
We're going to be disappointed to see how Martin & Hill recruit without having Bob Huggins behind them.

Disappointed compared to what?  Asbury recruiting?  Wooly recruiting?  I wish people would quit acting like our program has just been raking in the McD's AA over the past 20 years.  If all we end up with are 4* and 3* players with a 5* every other year, count me as not disappointed. 

Yeah, in comparison to what we thought we'd have if Huggins was the coach, it will probably be a drop off.  How much, who knows?

Did we hire a pair of coachs or recruiters?   
All of the talk is that we hired Martin and Hill, two well known recruiters to salvage this year's class and take us forward, and they will be able to take us forward because of their remarkable recruiting ability.  My point is that they won't be recruiting **($ past next year.  Look what happened to our Spring late signers we had lined up in Martin and Evans.  Both have already moved on.  As close to KSU as both were, and supposedly having been recruited by our top recruiters, they've already shifted their focus away from K-State sans Huggins.  Simply put Hill nor Martin have deep enough connections to land anyone on the current 2008 radar-

Are you saying Martin and Hill won't be able to recruit because of Tyree Evans?

I'll go ahead and see how things play out before I emphatically declare that we won't be able to land 3 star players.

No.

Clearly the best choice would have been to hire another coach who couldn't pull in good recruits in the future and then completely wipe out any and all chance of keeping next year's class. 

There was no good choice, maybe soon you'll realize just how hard Huggins screwed us.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

April 10, 2007, 11:44:04 AM
Reply #28

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
I agree with piss, but could we please enjoy this upcoming year?
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

April 10, 2007, 11:45:48 AM
Reply #29

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
No.

Clearly the best choice would have been to hire another coach who couldn't pull in good recruits in the future and then completely wipe out any and all chance of keeping next year's class. 

There was no good choice, maybe soon you'll realize just how hard Huggins screwed us.


So what does it matter?
(1) If we hire some mid major coach/assistant BCS coach, he won't be able to recruit.  
(2) If we never hired Huggins in the first place, see (1)

WTF?  Just quit Men's Basketball.