Phog.net ranks the Big XII

[michigancat]

Saved for future reference.  A&M and oSu really annoy the &@#% out of me for some reason.

http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm3.showMessage?topicID=77825.topic

ArrowheadRocks
Starter

   New Post Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition
Posted: 12/1/06 11:26:32 am       reply to this message here's my rankings as of December 1, 2006:

1. Kansas
2. Texas A&M
3. Texas
4. Oklahoma State
5. Texas Tech
6. Oklahoma
7. Missery
8. Nebraska
9. Baylor
10. Iowa State
11. Colorado
12. KSUck


Posts: 778
j5fuzz
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition
Posted: 12/1/06 11:32:27 am       reply to this message Nice try, you really hate KSU. A little biased there.

here's my rankings as of December 1, 2006:

1. Kansas
2. Texas A&M
3. Texas
4. Oklahoma State


HUGE GAP


5. Texas Tech
6. KSU
7. Baylor
8. Oklahoma
9. Nebraska
10. Missery
11. Iowa State


HUGE GAP

1,000,000. Colorado

Posts: 273
KansasPride
PTP'er


   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition
Posted: 12/1/06 11:34:47 am       reply to this message You really think KSU is better than MU?

Posts: 1764
Impuro
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition
Posted: 12/1/06 11:41:11 am       reply to this message You really think suk is better than Baylor?

Posts: 275
lomilaw
PTP'er


   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition
Posted: 12/1/06 11:57:35 am       reply to this message Are we ranking how good teams are now, or how they will finish the year?

Right now:

1. ku
2. A&M
3. OSU
4. UT
5. TT
6. BU
7. MU
8. NU
9. OU
10. KSU
11. ISU
12. CU

Finish the year:

1. ku
2. A&M
3. UT
4. OSU
5. MU
6. BU
7. TT
8. OU
9. KSU
10. NU
11. ISU
12. CU

[fatty fat fat]

phogblog.com predicts their season.


36-3

[pwrcatjd49]

they must be expecting some kind of streak...

[michigancat]

bullhorns12
All American


   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 12:56:08 pm       reply to this message I don't know if Missouri is the fifth best test in the Big 12 yet... but they looked great yesterday. Also, the south isn't going to have 4 spots in a row, because they go head-to-head against better teams. I could see KSU or MU even getting to #4.

1. ku
2. Texas A&M
3. Texas
4. Oklahoma St.

5. Missouri

6. KSU
7. Baylor
8. Oklahoma
9. Texas Tech
10. Nebraska
11. Iowa St.
12. Colorado

Long live the Bennie Rhodes attack..
Take us on the Rhode to the big dance!
Posts: 3570
KmJayhawk
Prep

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 1:53:04 pm       reply to this message Missouri was great against Arkansas but I think they'll hit some roadbumps. I say that it'll play out like this:

1. ku
2. Texas A&M
3. Texas
4. Oklahoma St.
5. Texas Tech
6. Oklahoma
7. Missouri
8. Baylor
9. KSU
10. Nebraska
11. Iowa St.
12. Colorado

Posts: 7
kansashoops
AKA Regnad Kcin

Premium Member

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:00:11 pm       reply to this message Anyone who doesn't think CU has 12th locked up hasn't been paying attention. They are just gawdawful.

Posts: 767
smsujayhawk
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:01:05 pm       reply to this message If you don't have Colorado 12 or lower on your list, your list is incorrect. If they win 2 conference games it will be amazing.

Posts: 475
DrJamesANaismith


Premium Member


   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:02:52 pm       reply to this message as of 12-1-06, no rational person couldn't have KSU in the bottom 3.

With Walker coming in, it could get much better, or it could implode.

Posts: 1673
1stMassHawk
All American

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:03:24 pm       reply to this message South teams have always suffered from playing each other twice. North teams have always suffered from having to play EACH year in the two toughest home courts (statistically) -- AFH and Boulder (tough on everyone but ku) -- instead of every other year.

THIS year, it appears to me, the South is stronger again, and Boulder looks like it won't be such a tough place to play. I think the schedule advantage just tipped further in favor of mediocre North teams than ever before.

So, I DON'T think this is the order of how good teams are, but I DO think it is the order of finish in conference play:

ku
TAMU
UT
OSU
MU
NU
Baylor
Tech
OU
KSU
CU
ISU

Posts: 2832
PaulEndacott
Starter


   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:23:59 pm       reply to this message Right now Air Force looks like the Big 12 Champion with wins over CU and Tech.

Seriously the worst two losses in the conference are CU getting dropped by UNC Wilmington and ORU over ku.

Based on what they've accomplished thus far, I'd rank'em like this...

ku...yeah we lost to ORU, but so what.

aTm...We''l no MUCH more about them in a week, but they look good.

OSU...undefeated won AT Mizzou St. ;^) and Auburn

UT quality win over SJU

MU...looked mighty impressive in Arkansas butt whipping.

NU...quality win over Creighton

Baylor...beat Colo St....played Gonzaga tough.

Tech...two losses, but appear to have some talent

ISU...win over Minnesota doesn't look that great anymore.

OU two "good" losses, they looked competitive against Memphis and Purdue

KSU...two king size butt whippings...lokking forward to seeing them in person against CSU tomorrow.

CU...Patton and Roby both mailing it in.

"I... uh, I... was... I think... unconscious at the time."--Q Snyder.

[pwrcatjd49]

If they would've been blown out against florida, would they still expect this 36-3 record?

[michigancat]

Predicted order of finish:

1) ku
2) UT
3) aTm
4) OSU
5) Tech
6) MU
7) KSU  <-------I thought I was being somewhat pessimistic
8) Nubb
9) OU
10) ISU
11) BU
12) CU

------------------------------------
Patz!
Posts: 3491
smsujayhawk
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:48:38 pm       reply to this message Just for the record Paul, OSU didn't win AT MO State, that game was in Padre.

Nobody wins at Hammons Student Center. ;)

Edited by: smsujayhawk at: 12/1/06 2:49:46 pm
Posts: 476
j5fuzz
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:53:54 pm       reply to this message Guess I missed the the last MU and KSU games.:) I still think after the top 4 it is a cr@p shoot. I think huggins will have KSU playing better by conference time and maybe I should raise misouri up a bit.

Posts: 275
The42Yardstick
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 2:54:09 pm       reply to this message K-State is NOT, I repeat, NOT the worst team in the Big 12 despite what some of you have posted here. Colorado gets that prestigious honor.

Posts: 151
BandG1MU
Player

   New Post Well Quin is gone but somehow I still think....
Posted: 12/1/06 3:57:14 pm       reply to this message MU finishes 6th. Coach Anderson might be able to coach them up to 4th or 5th since the south teams will beat each other up but that would be one hell of a coaching job. I'll go with:

1.ku
2.A&M
3.UT
4.OSU
5.MU
6.BU
7.TT
8.OU
9.NU, KSU, ISU(Tie)
12.CU

Posts: 491
The42Yardstick
Player

   New Post Re: Ranking the Big 12 Conference - December Edition - www.s
Posted: 12/1/06 4:03:50 pm       reply to this message Here's mine:

1. ku
2. A&M
3. UT
4. OSU
5. Tech
6. MU
7. NU
8. BU
9. OU
10. KSU
11. ISU

General consensus seems to be 9th or worse for KSU.

[fatty fat fat]

Yeah, we'll show em when we grab our standard T (7) - 6-10 12PM game in Dallas slot.

 

[Dan Rydell]

Yeah, we'll show em when we grab our standard T (7) - 6-10 12PM game in Dallas slot.

 

Then we'll kick the crap outta the #8 team and get stomped by the #1, per usual.

[cireksu]

It was exciting beating A&M  2 years ago.

The ISU game was tough to swallow.

[Dan Rydell]

I don't know how you can rank ku in the top half of the conference when they can't even beat teams like Oral Roberts and DePaul.

 

[PowerKAT]

Yeah whats the deal with that?  Even though the media did rank them #3 to start the season, but we all know the media doesn't know crap considering KSU football was supposed to win 1 game in the big12.  Anyways GayU loses to Oral Roberts, beats #1 Florida, then loses to Depaul???  Please just get GayU out of the top25 and save all the trouble

[michigancat]

From "Bluegrass Poke":

The Shockers won at LSU!

I would rank like this:

1. Wichita State (wins @GM, @LSU, @SU)
2. Oklahoma State (wins over SU and Mizz St.)
3. Kansas (win over FL, but DeP and ORU hurt)
4. Missouri State (beat Wiscy)
5. A&M (lost only tough game so far and WSU won)
6. Texas (young and talented)
7. Nebraska (Is CU any good?)
8. Missouri (beat Arky)
9. Tech
10. Baylor (getting gray now)
11. Iowa State
12. Oklahoma

Kansas State and Colorado have been removed from the Big XII conference. The conference RPI was bad enough so someone had to be cut. WSU will start a football program and Terry Allen's boys will move to 1-A football. Oklahoma stayed in the conference because of their football program.

CU has applied for membership into the PAC-10 and KSU is hoping the MVC will take them to replace WSU or MSU.

Welcome to the conference Shockers and Bears!

"Are you going to do something about it or just stand there and bleed?" Frank 'Pistol Pete' Eaton

_________

 

[fatty fat fat]

"Are you going to do something about it or just stand there and bleed?" Frank 'Pistol Pete' Eaton

badass

[michigancat]

ttt

[fatty fat fat]

beauty.

[BMWJhawk]

Phog.net owns Rusty.

[fatty fat fat]

Rusty, do you have any preseason phog.net lists?

[michigancat]

Rusty, do you have any preseason phog.net lists?

no.

Most probably would have had us in the top half, though.

[phog0731]

This thread is hilarious. Win 5 straight conference games against teams that are a combined 7-21 in conference play and all of a sudden you are a title contender. Good work.

[michigancat]

Win 5 straight conference games against teams that are a combined 7-21 in conference play and all of a sudden you are a title contender. Good work.

Believe it or not, he's right.

We are definitely a title contender.

[jmlynch1]

Big XII North Champs!!

[chum1]

Conference championships aren't really that big of a deal.

[jmlynch1]

you're right...

  Big XII North Champs 

[Ameroogie]

Conference championships aren't really that big of a deal.

I agree...championships are totally overrated.  What really counts are winning first-round games in the NCAA tournament.  Without the later, the championships really don't matter.

[ChicoRodriguez]

bump