ucinn wasn't that great while williams was there. and some of his stats are pretty average and are not greatly affected by teammate prowess (shooting %, a:t ratio). but sure, if all you are saying is williams would have gotten more than 20 minutes a game at ksu then i agree with that.
on the other hand better than 2005 peete - no, better than 2005 martin - no, better than 2005 massey - no, better than 2005 harris no. better than 2004 massey - no, better than 2004 ellis - no, better than 2004 hart - debatable, better than 2004 martin - probably, but only barely.
All that player comparison is subjective, and I'm guessing that you see a lot of it through purple shades... But, that's just my assumption.
You almost lost ALL credibility with me in saying that Ellis and Hart were better ball players than Williams, but again, it's all subjective.
With that said, I think Williams was a comparable talent to Peete, but don't forget that Peete was a well seasoned 20 yr old JR at KSU and Williams an 18 yr old true frosh. Peete also departed, btw. Comparing Williams and Massey is a moot point. Apples vs Oranges, but I do agree that Massey was a far bigger part of a poor team than Williams played on a good team.
You're crazy if you think that Harris is better than Nick Williams. Williams actually played both ends of the floor. Harris just might blossom under Huggins once he realizes that playing hard on defense will actually HELP his offensive game, not to mention his teammates.
At the end of the day, I'm just glad that our quality of play & players is going to take a dramatic upturn.
