Quote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 05:37:48 PMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 01:15:46 PMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depressionYeah, because us having our overall best team in quite some time doesn't increases our chances of winning games... when it comes to ku and ksu, nope. it doesn't. this is like the royals playing the yankees with their best team since '85Correct me if I'm wrong, but we beat you 2/3 in '88, right?*edit- Pretty sure my math isn"t correct. Kinda not sober here. Either way..
Quote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 01:15:46 PMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depressionYeah, because us having our overall best team in quite some time doesn't increases our chances of winning games... when it comes to ku and ksu, nope. it doesn't. this is like the royals playing the yankees with their best team since '85
Quote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depressionYeah, because us having our overall best team in quite some time doesn't increases our chances of winning games...
Quote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depression
Quote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.
You know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?
Quote from: JTKSU on October 21, 2009, 02:37:42 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 05:37:48 PMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 01:15:46 PMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depressionYeah, because us having our overall best team in quite some time doesn't increases our chances of winning games... when it comes to ku and ksu, nope. it doesn't. this is like the royals playing the yankees with their best team since '85Correct me if I'm wrong, but we beat you 2/3 in '88, right?*edit- Pretty sure my math isn"t correct. Kinda not sober here. Either way..3-0 that regular season against ku0-1 in NCAA tourney
Quote from: GoodForAnother on October 22, 2009, 01:13:10 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 21, 2009, 02:37:42 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 05:37:48 PMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 01:15:46 PMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depressionYeah, because us having our overall best team in quite some time doesn't increases our chances of winning games... when it comes to ku and ksu, nope. it doesn't. this is like the royals playing the yankees with their best team since '85Correct me if I'm wrong, but we beat you 2/3 in '88, right?*edit- Pretty sure my math isn"t correct. Kinda not sober here. Either way..3-0 that regular season against ku0-1 in NCAA tourney No.1-1 in regular season1-0 in conference tourney0-1 in NCAA
Quote from: Skycat on October 22, 2009, 11:20:02 AMQuote from: GoodForAnother on October 22, 2009, 01:13:10 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 21, 2009, 02:37:42 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 05:37:48 PMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 01:15:46 PMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: JTKSU on October 20, 2009, 02:56:21 AMQuote from: BullHawkWheel on October 20, 2009, 02:06:52 AMYou know what would be awesome?...Beating ku more than twice every 15 years?2 times in 4 years is a good start.maybe if you had a better chance to defeat us in the foreseeable future. 2 in 5, 2in 6, 2 in 7...depressionYeah, because us having our overall best team in quite some time doesn't increases our chances of winning games... when it comes to ku and ksu, nope. it doesn't. this is like the royals playing the yankees with their best team since '85Correct me if I'm wrong, but we beat you 2/3 in '88, right?*edit- Pretty sure my math isn"t correct. Kinda not sober here. Either way..3-0 that regular season against ku0-1 in NCAA tourney No.1-1 in regular season1-0 in conference tourney0-1 in NCAAyeah well you're ugly
