Date: 21/08/25 - 03:42 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Anyone else wish...  (Read 668 times)

October 20, 2006, 12:43:12 PM
Read 668 times

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643
That we would run a formation something like this?



With all of the talk about the shotgun, I just find myself wanting to see 2 backs deep like this.

Just seems more dynamic and appealing. Also seems like it would fit in a "west coast offense".

October 20, 2006, 12:50:37 PM
Reply #1

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Go down to the shovel pass play in the nebraska pass defense section.

http://rpongett.phpwebhosting.com/nebpreview.html

Looks like Patton and Antonio Brown.

October 20, 2006, 12:54:24 PM
Reply #2

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643
Go down to the shovel pass play in the nebraska pass defense section.

http://rpongett.phpwebhosting.com/nebpreview.html

Looks like Patton and Antonio Brown.

Huh, you're right.

And interesting that it would be Brown.

Worked like a charm.

October 20, 2006, 12:56:04 PM
Reply #3

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Brown is one of those elusive H-backs that we are recruiting by the dozen, but actually use once every 3 games or so.

October 20, 2006, 04:09:42 PM
Reply #4

Racquetball_Ninja

  • Guest
The only reason Thomas Clayton should ever see the field again is as a blocking back.  His ability to carry the ball is a f*ucking joke, maybe he could use some of those mussscles to block somebody.  Oh, that's right, he doesn't have any power either. 

No, that formation doesn't do anything for me but neither do our current formations.

October 20, 2006, 04:10:48 PM
Reply #5

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
The only reason Thomas Clayton should ever see the field again is as a blocking back.  His ability to carry the ball is a f*ucking joke, maybe he could use some of those mussscles to block somebody.  Oh, that's right, he doesn't have any power either. 

No, that formation doesn't do anything for me but neither do our current formations.

Goddam, we get it.  You don't like Thomas Clayton.

October 20, 2006, 04:13:44 PM
Reply #6

Racquetball_Ninja

  • Guest
The only reason Thomas Clayton should ever see the field again is as a blocking back.  His ability to carry the ball is a f*ucking joke, maybe he could use some of those mussscles to block somebody.  Oh, that's right, he doesn't have any power either. 

No, that formation doesn't do anything for me but neither do our current formations.

Goddam, we get it.  You don't like Thomas Clayton.

My apologies Rusty but I'm tired of people trying to make this guy out to be anything other than he really is.  Rant over.

October 20, 2006, 04:16:07 PM
Reply #7

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643
I will always have love in my heart for Thomas Clayton.


October 20, 2006, 05:11:25 PM
Reply #8

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
I learned a long time ago to never confuse a hard-on in the pants with Love in the heart.
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

October 20, 2006, 05:22:31 PM
Reply #9

Buddha_Cat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 675
I learned a long time ago to never confuse a hard-on in the pants with Love in the heart.

Now we know where you stand...not that there is anything wrong with that...
"Bob and myself had a nice chuckle over that one. Bob told me, ‘How could I say the things I’ve been saying about Kansas State to the kids and go someplace else?’ ”
Weiser, on rumors that Huggins might go to West Virginia, 4/26/2006
"I don’t see any sense in lying about anything.”  Huggins 2/22/07