Date: 20/08/25 - 12:35 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Needs for '08 recruiting class?  (Read 455 times)

August 29, 2007, 08:15:56 PM
Read 455 times

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
D-Line and O-Line, right? Then why have we offered so few of them?

August 29, 2007, 08:35:24 PM
Reply #1

catinthehat

  • Guest
just a guess but I think it's because prince is a know nothing tool.

August 29, 2007, 08:46:57 PM
Reply #2

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
D-Line and O-Line, right? Then why have we offered so few of them?

Looks like there are quite a few, what list were you looking at?

August 29, 2007, 09:05:49 PM
Reply #3

Legore

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1686
We've already got 3 o-lineman in the fold.  I don't know that we're going to take much more then that probably one more, I'd say two more at the most.  We're going to return 5 starters in the o-line next year and 9 of our top 10.   I know it sounds weird to say after the last few years but it's not a pressing need.   

Defensive line certainly is a need at both end and tackle.  Probably see a combo of JC and high school players at both spots.  We also need to land some young DB's we lose a lot at corner after this year and I think we could use some young safety talent as well.

I'd like to see us land the top remaining Kansas kids on our board Harper, Smith, Kyler Reed etc and then go after DL and DB's.   

August 29, 2007, 09:17:14 PM
Reply #4

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189
1 juco Dtackle.
1 HS Dtackle.

August 29, 2007, 09:21:45 PM
Reply #5

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
D-Line and O-Line, right? Then why have we offered so few of them?

Looks like there are quite a few, what list were you looking at?
I'm talking more of quality. We're lacking more on the defensive side of the ball rather than the offensive side.

August 29, 2007, 09:27:03 PM
Reply #6

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
1 juco Dtackle.
1 HS Dtackle.

Some of those DEs are DT candidates...(like Faustin was)...tough position to recruit, might be easier to build them.

August 29, 2007, 09:51:44 PM
Reply #7

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
1 juco Dtackle.
1 HS Dtackle.

Some of those DEs are DT candidates...(like Faustin was)...tough position to recruit, might be easier to build them.
Getting Gillespie would be HUGE. Too bad it won't happen..  :frown:

August 30, 2007, 12:04:36 PM
Reply #8

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
just a guess but I think it's because prince is a know nothing tool.

Ah yes, of course - this coming from someone who's coach is busy riding one of the most successful programs in NCAA FB into their new Nike turf...

August 30, 2007, 12:41:56 PM
Reply #9

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
just a guess but I think it's because prince is a know nothing tool.

Ah yes, of course - this coming from someone who's coach is busy riding one of the most successful programs in NCAA FB into their new Nike turf...

ADIDAS suxers!!!!!!!1!111!!!!!!!!!!11111111  :lol: :lol:
<---------Click the ball

August 30, 2007, 01:15:06 PM
Reply #10

Huskerfan

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 740
  • Personal Text
    Damn, I'm sexy
Quote
Needs for '08 recruiting class?

How about some talent? Your recruiting class is embarrassing. How many unranked and two-star community college washouts does one program need? It's like you're trying to corner the market on them.
I didn't attend college