Date: 17/08/25 - 18:17 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Short Term vs. Long Term  (Read 147 times)

April 06, 2007, 11:41:13 AM
Read 147 times

catdude33

  • Guest
JMO, but &@#% long term.  Thinking long term has gotten us nowhere in the last 20 years.  We need to keep this recruiting class intact by retaining FM and DH.  We can be awesome for one year, and I can get season tickets one more time and watch Beasley, Walker, Sutton, Hoskins, etc. dominate.  We can end that &@#%ing streak at the Bram, make the sweet 16+, and then go back to sucking and I won't care.  Just give me next year.  That is all I ask. 

April 06, 2007, 11:49:44 AM
Reply #1

KSUGRAD2001

  • Guest
This is also the best long term solution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   You would be crazy to think that this recruiting class would not help KSU gain national attention.  It is not the coaches, it is the players!!  KSU will be a more appealing job if they go to the elite eight a couple years in a row.  It would be easier for K-state to get a better coach later on if Martin and Hill leave on down the road.  If we lose these recruits where in the hell would we be?
« Last Edit: April 06, 2007, 11:52:24 AM by KSUGRAD2001 »