Date: 23/08/25 - 06:02 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: rivals100 front page  (Read 876 times)

March 06, 2007, 09:59:15 AM
Read 876 times

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Has feature on recruit...with KSU in lead!

http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

March 06, 2007, 10:09:07 AM
Reply #1

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
That's great.  I remember all the Rivals Top 100 guys KSU signed in the Snyder era, and it's good to be after a few of them again.

 :rolleyes:  :rolleyes:

March 06, 2007, 11:09:17 AM
Reply #2

Buddha_Cat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 675
Tom looks a little too old to help us out.
"Bob and myself had a nice chuckle over that one. Bob told me, ‘How could I say the things I’ve been saying about Kansas State to the kids and go someplace else?’ ”
Weiser, on rumors that Huggins might go to West Virginia, 4/26/2006
"I don’t see any sense in lying about anything.”  Huggins 2/22/07

March 06, 2007, 11:34:29 AM
Reply #3

Pike

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2603
Tom looks a little too old to help us out.

I don't get it either.

March 06, 2007, 02:32:28 PM
Reply #4

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Who is this player?

March 06, 2007, 02:53:07 PM
Reply #5

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

March 06, 2007, 02:56:10 PM
Reply #6

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
How come Wisconsin is in on every single kid that we are in on? Damn you Bielema!!!

March 06, 2007, 03:01:50 PM
Reply #7

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
LaMark 2?

Probably not.  Great size though, 6'3'' 215.

Our future offense is ridiculously huge:

QB - 6'6'' (250)
RB - 6'3'' (Will be 230ish?)
WR - 6'3'' (But will be about 230)
WR - 6'2'' (Hogan!)
OL - 6'6''/6'7''

March 13, 2007, 10:33:22 PM
Reply #8

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Doesn't look like anything special, but his size will guarantee 3 stars.  Which will make him a better player!  :ksu: