Date: 22/08/25 - 15:42 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Grading the season  (Read 944 times)

December 29, 2006, 10:20:53 AM
Read 944 times

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
The worst part of the season is the average margin of loss.  It makes the evaluation of the team/coaching staff that much more difficult.  Our expectations for this year were based upon the previous two years and a new coaching staff implementing a new system....but just because we thought they should be bad or it would be a struggle to get to a bowl game doesn't build in excuses for their performance (or lack there of). 

The defense regressed as the season went on.  Maybe regressed isn't the right word as much as it was a case of being exposed.  We can't stop the run.  We haven't all year and with Echols leaving and no promising DT prospects on the horizon, it doesn't look like we will next year either because the "scheme" isn't going to change.  Chicago Bears run a "cover 2" only they have outstanding DT's.  Tampa had an outstanding defense with Warren Sapp anchoring the middle.  The Colts don't have any good DT's and even with some of the best DE's, they get ran on.  The defense was "better" than the last two years, but we can't use the past two years as a bench mark as they were horrible. 
C+

The offense progressed as the season went on under Freeman, only to be exposed in the past two games.  Pressure up the middle isn't handled well by the o-line or Freeman.  The offense lacks an identity or any ingenuity other than a few trick plays.  The same plays are run out of the same formations and teams are figuring that out.  Patton, Johnson, Freeman, and Jordy should provide a nice core of returning players, but the offensive line has so much work to do it isn't even funny.  I can't imagine they'll be able to take that huge step it will take in order to seriously compete for the North next year. 
C+

Special Teams was a bright spot in that we actually make teams prepare or think about our return game.  Our defensive return units need some work though.  Figurs and Snodgrass will be tough to replace.   
B+

Coaching was the "best of times and worst of times".  When it was good, it was good but when it was bad it was really bad.  And the bad seemed to be worse than the good was good.  I guess these things happen with young coaching staffs, but they've got to grow up quick.  We dont' appear to make adjustments very well, and quite honestly, as a program we haven't since M. Stoops and Venables left.  I remember always just wanting to get to half time because we'd make the proper adjustments at half.  Now, that's not the case.  If we didn't go into the game with a good game plan, it isn't going to change at half.  At the same time, this coaching staff implemented its systems and got most if not all the team to buy in.  They also got themselves to a bowl game, something that most thought would be a struggle.  Prince proved to be both scary and smart but not necessarily scary smart.   
C+/B- 


December 29, 2006, 10:37:45 AM
Reply #1

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
If you're going to grade off of expectations, then I give them a B.  An A would have been "miracle season" but a C would have been "eh ok, you got us 6 wins and a bowl."  So B as far as expectations.  Almost every other Big XII coach was sitting at home this time of their first year coaching while their fans said "He gets a pass because it's his first year and he needs more time to get his system implemented and his own players in here."  We're not saying that.  Instead we're saying "Damn!  We finished the season with only 7 wins and only 4 conference wins(we had 4 combined conference wins the last two years.)  I'm so disappointed!"

Spoiled by winning.

..But, if you were grading on what we "expect" on a consistant basis, (and we were spoiled by the 95-03 Snyder teams,) then this was a below average year.  C-.

Individual Grades:
Offense: D (Consistantly bad throughout the year, had two "good" games and one "holy crap" game in the second half of the season.)
Defense: C (Would get a D or an F if based on the last half of the year, but their early season play is the reason we're even bowl eligible.)
Special Teams: A (I don't care what anyone says, we've been damn good at ST this year.  Multiple blocked punts, blocked FG, multiple punt returns for TDs, multiple KO returns for TDs, it doesn't get a whole lot better than this.  Snodgrass came through when it mattered, and Reyer had an OK year.)

December 29, 2006, 10:44:52 AM
Reply #2

Poopley

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1103
  • Personal Text
    rokkar stokkar
You can forget about winning the North. Slashahan has compiled some serious talent and nubb is the class of the division. Mizzou stomped the shiznitz out of us and is clearly ahead right now too.

On the bright side, we have Josh Moore returning. He's pretty good.  :koolaid:

December 29, 2006, 10:16:06 PM
Reply #3

ds43fan

  • Guest
Prince will not win the north for atleast 3 years, however he will win it when it becomes important for his job

December 30, 2006, 12:03:24 AM
Reply #4

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
however he will win it when it becomes important for his job

How do you figure?

December 30, 2006, 11:18:04 AM
Reply #5

ds43fan

  • Guest

December 30, 2006, 12:58:23 PM
Reply #6

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
C+

I'll give him a passing grade.

December 30, 2006, 04:02:10 PM
Reply #7

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
C-

It was a C+ before the game, if we would have won I would say, B+.
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

December 30, 2006, 04:30:00 PM
Reply #8

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
Given the expectations going into the season, its hard to say that the overall grade can be less than a B.  However, there are also a ton of questions going into next year, and sadly we seem to have more questions after the bowl game. 

I've been on a messageboard fast since the game.  I thought it might be best to just stay away.

December 30, 2006, 04:46:48 PM
Reply #9

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Given the expectations going into the season, its hard to say that the overall grade can be less than a B.  However, there are also a ton of questions going into next year, and sadly we seem to have more questions after the bowl game. 

That might be a better way to explain it.  The season was at or above expectations (based on the a new coaching staff with new systems and the past two seasons), but the future doesn't exactly look that "bright".  We still have major issues on both sides of the ball that center around problems that have plagued this program since the end of 2003, namely at O-line and a D-line, specifically DT.  Add to that the fact that we lose some LB's that made tackles (Diles and Archer), our best OL (Wafford) who was treated like a prison bitch in the bowl game, and a big play type guy in Figurs.  Also, for some reason the coaching staff appears to like seeing McKinney get beat on a consistent basis. 

December 30, 2006, 05:17:16 PM
Reply #10

catsfan20012002

  • Guest
I said a solid B before the bowl so since we lost I'll knock it down to a B-. We had a bad ending to the season but you can't forget how much we accomplished. Everybody had us finishing 6th in the North. We finished tied for 2nd and if we play Baylor later in the season we don't lose that game. Other then that we lost to ranked Nebraska, Missouri and Rutgers teams. We.....HELLO.....Beat Texas and you can chalk that ku game to a Texas hangover.

Priorities for this offseason should be the OL and WR positions on offense and the DT and LB positions on defense.

December 30, 2006, 05:28:10 PM
Reply #11

Racquetball_Ninja

  • Guest
C-

It was a C+ before the game, if we would have won I would say, B+.

 :lol:  You grade like KatKid takes tests!

December 30, 2006, 05:59:24 PM
Reply #12

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
We.....HELLO.....Beat Texas and you can chalk that ku game to a Texas hangover.

Hello....the Texas game was a fluke and you can chalk up the ku game to getting out coached and out played by ku. 

December 30, 2006, 06:35:01 PM
Reply #13

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
We played 5 ranked teams this year. We played 2 combined from 2004-2005.

If you look at it from a simple WL perspective, you can't give it anything other than a solid B.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

December 30, 2006, 07:08:28 PM
Reply #14

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
If you look at it from a simple WL perspective, you can't give it anything other than a solid B.

To look at it any other way is to Wooly-ize the situation.

December 30, 2006, 08:22:10 PM
Reply #15

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
C-

It was a C+ before the game, if we would have won I would say, B+.

 :lol:  You grade like KatKid takes tests!

csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

January 02, 2007, 02:38:57 PM
Reply #16

Andy

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1506
  • Personal Text
    KSU '06 Alum
B+

new inexperienced staff, new system, with underachieving poor attitude returning upperclassmen manage to finish 7-6 after turning the roster over with a true frosh QB and a ton of inexperience littered accross the two-deep.
 
I dont see how this season can't be viewed as a great success.  Frankly, we were unlucky to draw rutgers in the bowls, we should have been matched up with a much weaker team.  I dont think any other big 12 team would have beaten them and few would have even looked good in a loss. 
As for the ku game, well thats not good, but i'll take the top 5 texas win in a trade-off there any day.

i dont think 8 or 9 wins is out of the question next year. i'm on board and ready to go.