Date: 20/08/25 - 04:42 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Hey Terry Pierce...  (Read 14667 times)

December 02, 2008, 01:08:01 PM
Reply #210

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
NFLDraftScout.com

The rest of your post contained nothing of interest to me, Pitt.  Sorry.   :lol:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

December 02, 2008, 02:01:20 PM
Reply #211

PittsburgJayhawk

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 250
  • Personal Text
    I'm impossible to fool.
NFLDraftScout.com

The rest of your post contained nothing of interest to me, Pitt.  Sorry.   :lol:

Haha, why are you apologizing?  I'm not the one crying about your failure to respond to my posts.

December 02, 2008, 02:06:54 PM
Reply #212

PittsburgJayhawk

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 250
  • Personal Text
    I'm impossible to fool.
I just want to sit back and admire this.

On one side; a ku frat boy pissant.   On the other side; a former D1 football player, the Big 12 Defensive Freshman of the Year, an Academic All Big 12 team member,  and a 2nd round NFL draft pick.



PROVE ME WRONG and I can possibly see things your way.

I don't see how it's possible for someone to prove you wrong here.  Not only is the concept of "talent" completely open to interpretation and different definitions, but you've failed to provide your baseline definition of the term. Until I know, specifically, what you're talking about when you're evaluating a player's talent, it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion on the matter. 

Is it simply athleticism?

EDIT:

Just to clarify, I'm not interested in the Webster's definition of the term. As you yourself said, "talent" is entirely subjective. In order to have a discussion on your terms, I need to know what your personal definition is.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2008, 02:10:55 PM by PittsburgJayhawk »

December 02, 2008, 02:30:17 PM
Reply #213

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
I just want to sit back and admire this.

On one side; a ku frat boy pissant.   On the other side; a former D1 football player, the Big 12 Defensive Freshman of the Year, an Academic All Big 12 team member,  and a 2nd round NFL draft pick.





That's the beauty of message boards.  I can argue with a guy who I greatly respect as far as his football talent and as a human being, but who I fundamentally disagree with on certain issues.  Mike Leach never played college football, but he's a hell of a football coach.  Just because I wasn't out there making tackles doesn't mean I can't have an opinion or be right about certain things.  

Reverse the roles, 'Pad... imagine a ku fan tryin to convince K-State fans that after losing 52-21, ku was just as talented.  That ku fan would be crucified and called moron.  There's a double standard at play here, and instead of K-State fans using their own common sense, you're resorting to personal attacks and blind homerism.
Here's whats amazing to me...Everyone says that I'm arguing with a bias, when I have asked several times for BMW to prove me wrong. I think we forget that he called me out. I am looking at this from a pure talent based level. OK, Meier has been productive, but I-not U, believe it comes more from his football knowledge and the type of defense that must be played vs. the spread. I still hadn't seen him beat guys one-on-one, something talented guys do. I keep being called a homer when credit has been given to the success of ku players, which  I attribute more to great coaching and the ability to their individual jobs within their offense, not talent. I am explaining where I am coming from. BMW says that the board is resorting to personal attacks, yet when he is proved wrong he calls me moron, ridiculous, homer and many others without ever proving me wrong. Even when he says that he will comeback with research, he still says he will come back with STATS, RECRUITING INFO, and Specific examples. When I have been asking for specific examples this entire thread. Stats and recruiting info mean jack to me as far as talent. A more talented receiver can play for a running team and not have the stats to match up. A more talented guy can have less stars than another guy and still be more talented. Even worse, you made the comment BMW, that ku was more talented and you are just now going to find specific examples. No one ever said ku was not a good TEAM. EVER. I did say ku 07 was not as good as they think, and still stand by that statement. Meier doesnt have to be the most talented to do well in the nFL which is exactly my point. He just like everyone else would need a team that asks him to do good at what he does well, like find the hole in the zone based on the coverage. I can guarantee you that he will not be asked to beat guys 1 on 1.
I believe you guys are letting your bias get in the way. It's understandable because you are proud of your team but that you shouldn't overlook when the discussion was about to begin with. I would make the same argument with any two teams that I have watched closely. But it's my opinion. Dont get pissed because you cant prove it.
ku ranks 23 in total offense and KSU ranks 35 . Total Defense ku ranks 95 and KSU ranks 117 These are the facts about the stats. You mean to tell me with a better coach KSU couldnt move from 35 to 23 or 117 to 95. This is the reason why I say what you guys believe is a talent difference is really a difference in coaching. PROVE ME WRONG and I can possibly see things your way. You cant believe that you or your friends have done that up to this point... :nahnah:
It seems to me BMW and his buddies get pissed at me disagreeing with them, not the other way around. But, getting pissed is not the way for you to prove yourself when someone disagrees. Continuing to ask me what is talent after I posted the Websters definition. The talent of a guy would be exactly what you perceive the talent to be and is very subjective. I have only asked for proof. He gave me one with Meier. One. Which I disagreed with and gave the reason why.


Terry, I think most of this argument is based on two different interpretations of the word "talent."  I believe talent is more than just athletic ability.  I think there's an inherent "it" factor with some players that allows them to consistently make the big play and be in the right place at the right time.  I think ku has more of those types of players than K-State.  I also believe that ku has more potential NFL prospects than K-State.  I agree with you that ku is more well-coached under than Mangino than K-State was under Ron Prince.  Where I disagree, and I think others disagree as well, is that K-State's recruiting classes and current group of players are on par with ku.  

I apologize for some of the harsh words, and I don't mean it literally in the sense that you're a "moron."  I just find certain arguments that you make "moronic," such as your argument that K-State's receivers and d-line are better than ku's.  I think it's "ridiculous" when you say that '07 was the worst year ever for the Big 12 North.  I'm criticizing your statements, not you as a person.  I have a high amount of respect for anyone who has played football at the high D-1 level.  I'm sorry to call you out like this, but I really wanted to know why someone with such football knowledge, such as yourself, would honestly believe K-State and ku were even in talent level.

In the ku vs. K-State game, ku outrushed K-State, ~ 280 to ~ 90.  To me, that showed a correlation between each team's o-line and d-line.  When I watched the game, to me, it looked like ku dominated both lines of scrimmage.  Watching the ku/K-State game as someone who has never played college football, ku looked to have a more physical, more deep, overall more talented football team.  I've seen K-State fans consistently say that Freeman is more talented than Reesing.  On a purely physical standpoint, that's true.  On a purely skill and talent standpoint, that's ridiculous.  Look at the numbers.  They don't lie.  Freeman, against ku, has had something like 1 TD and 13 TO's.  That's a fact.  

I haven't even talked about Dezmon Briscoe yet.  The guy's only a true sophomore, and he has already broken ku's all-time record for receiving yards and receiving TD's.  This is a kid who came from a high school program (Cedar Hill) that went 16-0 his senior year.  He had offers to Mizzou, Iowa, and Oklahoma State.  He's a finesse receiver who can beat you down field or he can beat you underneath.  There's not a single player on K-State's team as dynamic and as difficult to defend as Dezmon Briscoe.  

Finally, let's talk depth.  There are two huge differences between ku and K-State: (1) recruiting high school prospects vs Juco prospects, and (2) in-state recruiting and establishing Texas pipelines.  ku is prioritizing high school prospects, while winning most of the in-state recruiting battles vs. K-State.  ku is also getting a nice pipeline going through Dallas and other parts of Texas.  Here's an example of the last two recruiting classes for ku and K-State (Jucos in bold):


ku:

'07:

Isiah Barfield ATH  6-0 175 - 5.4   Haven, KS
Dezmon Briscoe WR  6-2 180 4.7 5.5  Cedar Hill, TX
Anthony Davis DB  5-11 184 4.5 5.5  Tulsa, OK
Patrick Dorsey DT  5-11 263 5.22 5.5  Houston, TX
Drew Dudley LB  6-2 212 4.6 5.5  College Station, TX
Steven Foster RB  6-3 230 4.68 5.5  Sedgwick, KS
Kendrick Harper DB  5-10 187 4.45 5.5   El Dorado, KS
Chris Harris ATH  6-0 180 4.4 5.2  Bixby, OK
Chet Hartley OL  6-4 310 5.07 5.6   El Dorado, KS
Jeremiah Hatch OL  6-3 301 - 5.5  Dallas, TX  
Richard Johnson Jr. DE  6-4 255 5 5.6   Jefferson City, MO
Jake Laptad DE  6-4 215 - 5.2   Jenks, OK
Rell Lewis ATH  5-10 180 4.5 5.5  Muskogee, OK
Ryan Murphy DB  5-10 171 4.4 5.8  Lawrence, KS
Patrick Resby DB  6-2 195 - 5.7  Corsicana, TX
Jeff Spikes OL  6-5 316 5.77 5.2   Painesville, OH
Justin Springer LB  6-4 220 - 5.5   Los Fresnos, TX
A.J. Steward QB  6-4 210 4.6 5.4   St. Louis, MO
Johnathan Wilson WR  6-3 185 4.6 5.2   Houston, TX

'08:


Tim Biere TE  6-4 226 4.8 5.7  Omaha, NE
Greg Brown DB  5-11 164 - 5.6  Cedar Hill, TX
Jocques Crawford RB  6-1 220 4.55 5.9  Cisco, TX
Nathan D'Cunha OL  6-7 307 - 5.8   Santa Barbara, CA
Rod Harris WR  6-2 190 4.5 5.6   Brenham, TX
Tanner Hawkinson TE  6-6 230 4.8 5.7  McPherson, KS
Ben Lueken OL  6-5 318 5.1 5.5  St. Louis, MO
Trevor Marrongelli OL  6-4 285 5.1 5.5  Round Rock, TX
D.J. Marshall DE  6-4 230 4.75 5.6  Mesquite, TX
Darius Parish DT  6-3 325 5.08 5.5  Wichita, KS
Daymond Patterson WR  5-8 165 4.43 5.7  Mesquite, TX
Kale Pick QB  6-1 198 4.5 5.6  Dodge City, KS
Nicholas Plato DE  6-6 228 4.82 5.5  Edwardsville, IL
Corrigan Powell DB  5-10 161 4.5 5.5  Garland, TX
Sean Ransburg ATH  6-1 185 4.5 5.5  Harrisonville, MO
Josh Richardson LB  6-4 195 4.45 5.5   Dublin, OH
Alonso Rojas K  6-3 195 - 5.5   Miami, FL
Lubbock Smith DB  5-11 182 4.4 5.6  Dallas, TX
John Williams OL  6-4 335 - 5.7   Tulsa, OK
Duane Zlatnik DE  6-4 260 - 5.6   Rossville, KS


K-State:

'07:

Mike Abana DT  6-6 290 - 5.5   Santa Monica, CA
Corey Adams OL  6-4 235 - 5.2  Monument, CO
Alesana Alesana OL  6-6 318 - 5.6   San Francisco, CA
Clyde Aufner OL  6-7 260 - 5.6  Peculiar, MO
Demetrius Bell RB  5-8 158 4.4 5.4  Olathe, KS
Lamark Brown ATH  6-3 215 4.55 6.0   St. Louis, MO
Gary Chandler DB  5-11 186 4.43 6.0  Coffeyville, KS
Josh Cherry K  6-1 170 4.8 5.5  McCook, NE
Kaleb Drinkgern OL  6-7 260 4.9 5.2  Marysville, KS  
Colten Freeze OL  6-6 270 5.1 5.4  Liberty, MO
Raphael Guidry DE  6-4 245 4.7 5.4  La Marque, TX
Brian Harris LB  6-4 220 4.6 5.3   East St. Louis, IL
Tysyn Hartman ATH  6-3 191 4.65 5.5  Wichita, KS
Reggie Haynes DB  6-1 170 4.65 5.3   Apopka, FL
Danny Hogan WR  6-2 185 4.4 5.4   Dallas, TX
Payton Kirk DE  6-5 250 4.8 5.3  Liberty, MO
Ben Liu OL  6-6 325 5.2 5.5   Sacramento, CA
Kendrick Matthews DB  5-11 180 4.5 5.4  Missouri City, TX
Jerrell McDaniel WR  6-1 185 4.5 5.5   East St. Louis, IL
Deon Murphy ATH  5-10 165 4.36 5.6  Coffeyville, KS
Ernie Pierce WR  6-4 215 4.5 5.6   Santa Barbara, CA
Jake Roepke OL  6-7 298 5.1 5.1  Hoyt, KS
Kevin Rohleder LB  6-1 205 4.4 5.5  Wichita, KS
Eldridge Sims OL  6-6 288 5.1 5.5   Compton, CA
Xzavier Stewart DT  6-1 260 4.7 5.2  Chicago, IL
Dahrnaz Tigner DB  6-3 210 4.5 5.0   Pampano Beach, FL
Brandon Walls LB  6-0 205 4.49 5.6  Irving, TX
Justin Woods DB  5-10 180 4.3 5.5  Shawnee, KS

'08:

Brandon Banks WR  5-8 160 4.4 5.6   Bakersfield, CA
Dustin Bell DB  6-0 180 4.45 5.6   Bakersfield, CA
Josh Berard LB  6-2 220 4.7 5.6  Torrance, CA
Daniel Calvin DT  6-3 322 4.9 5.9  Bakersfield, CA
Jarell Childs RB  6-3 216 4.5 5.4  Kansas City, MO
William Cooper OL  6-5 260 - 5.3   Hayti, MO
Logan Dold ATH  6-1 200 4.54 5.6  Garden Plain, KS
Ethan Douglas OL  6-6 285 - 5.3  Basehor, KS
Antonio Felder DE  6-3 245 4.5 5.6   El Dorado, KS
John Finau DT  6-1 295 5 5.6  Torrance, CA
Zach Hanson OL   6-8 310 - -   Sacramento, CA
Brandon Harold DE  6-5 260 - 5.6   East St. Louis, IL
Jack Hayes DE  6-4 255 - 5.4   Perkinston, MS
Adrian Hilburn WR  6-2 190 4.4 5.7   San Francisco, CA
Blair Irvin DB  5-11 185 4.4 5.6  Coffeyville, KS
Joseph Kassanavoid ATH  6-6 215 4.7 5.5  Lawson, MO
Collin Klein QB  6-4 202 4.65 5.6  Loveland, CO
Billy McClellan DB  5-9 180 4.4 5.5   Wilmington, CA
George Pierson K  6-0 180 - 5.4   Tyler, TX
Ulla Pomele LB  6-1 235 - 5.8   Santa Rosa, CA
Edward Prince OL  6-5 280 4.8 5.6   Wesson, MS
Aubrey Quarles WR  6-2 190 4.4 5.9   Santa Rosa, CA
Hansen Sekona LB  6-0 230 4.6 5.6  San Mateo, CA  
Attrail Snipes WR  6-1 180 4.4 5.5   Bakersfield, CA  
Grant Valentine DE  6-3 240 4.5 5.6   Glendale, CA
Wade Weibert OL  6-5 300 5.12 5.6  El Dorado, KS
Braden Wilson LB  6-4 220 - 5.0   Smith Center, KS


Many of the commitments from K-State's classes didn't show up, or either transferred or quit the team.  ku, meanwhile, is building depth through high school prospects.  I have no doubt that the aftermath from these past two recruiting classes will come back to bite K-State.  Snyder has his work cut out for him.

December 02, 2008, 02:39:35 PM
Reply #214

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
NFLDraftScout.com

The rest of your post contained nothing of interest to me, Pitt.  Sorry.   :lol:

Haha, why are you apologizing?  I'm not the one crying about your failure to respond to my posts.
crying?  simply pointing out that you have nothing.  enjoy having nothing.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

December 02, 2008, 03:23:38 PM
Reply #215

PittsburgJayhawk

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 250
  • Personal Text
    I'm impossible to fool.
I just want to sit back and admire this.

On one side; a ku frat boy pissant.   On the other side; a former D1 football player, the Big 12 Defensive Freshman of the Year, an Academic All Big 12 team member,  and a 2nd round NFL draft pick.



PROVE ME WRONG and I can possibly see things your way.

I don't see how it's possible for someone to prove you wrong here.  Not only is the concept of "talent" completely open to interpretation and different definitions, but you've failed to provide your baseline definition of the term. Until I know, specifically, what you're talking about when you're evaluating a player's talent, it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion on the matter. 

Is it simply athleticism?

EDIT:

Just to clarify, I'm not interested in the Webster's definition of the term. As you yourself said, "talent" is entirely subjective. In order to have a discussion on your terms, I need to know what your personal definition is.

Hey what a smart guy! Since the term is subjective how can I give you exactly what it means?

To me talent is not only athleticism but a persons natural ability to play the game that exceeds that of a "normal" player. I try to take scheme, coaching, and overall team success away to get to the players real talent. It's like Matt Leinart and Ken Dorsey...Most normal QBs would have been good at Miami or USC at those times not because of their own talent, but because Coaching and the Talent they had around them. Take that away and you have two regular QBs, no matter what their Star rating was for Rivals.

If its athleticism to you...Explain why ku players are more athletic. I stated that the talent is what you perceive already. It is possible to prove anyone wrong with the right proof to back up your statements no matter your definition. BMW has tried to use stats, overall record, and recruiting info to prove talent. If talent is athleticism to you, explain why you believe they are more athletic. Pretty simple if you ask me. I was called out here by a guy who had nothing to back his statements up with, who obviously got excited after watching the ku MU game. Hell, I made the statement when KSU played ku. It took a win over MU for any of you to ever challenge the statement until now...
And you with all the things you're "not interested" in...Like anyone cares


Terry,

It's going to be difficult to get anyone to believe that you're not biased, or that you're interested in honest discussion, if this is how you're going to respond to a simple question. 

On topic, you keep asking people to "prove you wrong," but you've set up a system where that's impossible. You say that KSU is the more talented team, but when asked to define "talent," you admit that it's entirely subjective. Okay...so how, exactly, does one go about proving you wrong?

You're relying entirely on your reputation as a former player to make the case for your expertise and authority. There's no way anyone is going to be able to reasonably argue against that, because your own stance is completely illogical – based in opinion rather than the facts that you keep harping on BMW to provide.

The difference here is that I recognize that my opinion on what defines talent can't be disproved, and therefore wouldn't expect anyone to be able to do so. It's an opinion, a take on an admittedly subjective term.  There's no "proof" involved. All I can do is explain what makes me think the way that I do.

I think that talent is a combination of things. Athleticism is part of it, but so is intelligence – and not in a "book smarts" sense, but in their ability to analyze and understand the game of football. It's why I think a guy like Kerry Meier is exceedingly talented.   Not only does he possess the physical tools to excel (hands, size, and speed), but he instinctively understands how to play the game. The final touchdown against Missouri is a great example. Not only did he physically beat the safety with whom he was matched up, but he possessed the wherewithal to break off his route and head upfield when the situation demanded.

I suppose I could try to breakdown the players on both sides, but I really doubt anyone is going to change the other's mind here.  And that's fine. I just found it interesting that you kept asking BMW to prove, or disprove, something for which you were unwilling to provide your own definition.

December 02, 2008, 03:51:01 PM
Reply #216

kstatewildcat98

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 30
PJ, evaluating talent is very subjective, and hence, difficult job.  Its why recruiters that are good at it get paid the big bucks.  There are some objective measures such as 40 times, bench press numbers, etc, but there are other things that are much more difficult to quantify.

December 02, 2008, 04:19:58 PM
Reply #217

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
One: 1805
Chapter I
Chapter II
Chapter III
Chapter IV
Chapter V
Chapter VI
Chapter VII
Chapter VIII
Chapter IX
Chapter X
Chapter XI
Chapter XII
Chapter XIII
Chapter XIV
Chapter XV
Chapter XVI
Chapter XVII
Chapter XVIII
Chapter XIX
Chapter XX
Chapter XXI
Chapter XXII
Chapter XXIII
Chapter XXIV
Chapter XXV
Chapter XXVI
Chapter XXVII
Chapter XXVIII
Book Two: 1805
Chapter I
Chapter II
Chapter III
Chapter IV
Chapter V
Chapter VI
Chapter VII
Chapter VIII
Chapter IX
Chapter X
Chapter XI
Chapter XII
Chapter XIII
Chapter XIV
Chapter XV
Chapter XVI
Chapter XVII
Chapter XVIII
Chapter XIX
Chapter XX
Chapter XXI
Book Three: 1805
Chapter I
Chapter II
Chapter III
Chapter IV
Chapter V
Chapter VI
Chapter VII
Chapter VIII
Chapter IX
Chapter X
Chapter XI
Chapter XII
Chapter XIII
Chapter XIV
Chapter XV
Chapter XVI
Chapter XVII
Chapter XVIII
Chapter XIX

December 02, 2008, 08:22:49 PM
Reply #218

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Very  :kstatriot: thread.

December 03, 2008, 05:12:00 AM
Reply #219

PittsburgJayhawk

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 250
  • Personal Text
    I'm impossible to fool.

Seriously pitt, this is troubling coming from you. Go  :crybaby: about it dude. I never once said that KSU was more talented. I said they were just as talented. He called me out because ku won a game against mizzou,and its obvious because i said that 5 or 6 weeks ago. now back to the subject...Because he called me out, I told him to prove me wrong. He went on to tell me that ku was more talented because you guys beat us 52-21, you guys beat mizzou, and he believes you guys have better guys that we hadnt seen before(recruits). Believe me dude, the crap he was talking was hardly proving that ku was more talented. And you? Why would you screw a good response up with such nonsense. "I am making it impossible for anyone to prove wrong, my stance which is completely illogical." Sounds smart but really just whining. Based on what you just described as being talented (instead of repeatedly asking, "then what is talent?"), i guess kerry meier is more talented than i thought (still not that talented though). YOu gave a good example of why I should think so. But you ruin it with all the b**chin and moanin about your own gripe that you just proved wrong
Toughen up! That was good conversation before you went booohooo'd on me... :kstatriot: had to end with that!

Honestly, Terry, I'm not even sure what half of this post means. Well done.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2008, 05:16:11 AM by PittsburgJayhawk »

December 03, 2008, 08:51:05 AM
Reply #220

mcmwcat

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3481
  • Personal Text
    Now that's how you get out a f***ing blood stain.
this thread needs to  :suicideispainless:
When I was a kid growing up in the projects, I used to dream of going into space, of escaping the slums, of killing an Ewok!

November 17, 2009, 10:31:50 PM
Reply #221

doom

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 9952
Quote
not claiming a DoD.  just wondering how you guys claim it with a straight face.

I don't know. Imagine ku having the 2007 team for 11 straight years. Yeah, ku fans wouldn't celebrate that at all.

but alas, when you have one great year then fall back the next year like ku constantly does, it can be hard to relate...i understand.



 :lol:



That's not even close to a good comparison.  ku's '07 team was better than anything K-State football has put on the field.  Period.  You never even competed for a National Championship.  You had six straight 11-win seasons.  Congrats.  That doesn't compare to winning the National Championship, believe me.  You'll never understand what it's like until you experience one for yourself. 

ku has a chance to go 8-5 this year and will have been bowl eligible 4 out of the last 5 years.  ku should be one of the favorites to win the North again next year and I wouldn't be surprised if this program started winning 8-10 games a season.  K-State is in desperation mode after hiring a 70 year-old Bill Snyder and your '09 recruiting class is a joke. 

Enjoy bowl season sitting at home watching K-State basketball.

 :lol:


I still want my cooler, bitches!

November 17, 2009, 10:34:46 PM
Reply #222

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
Quote
not claiming a DoD.  just wondering how you guys claim it with a straight face.

I don't know. Imagine ku having the 2007 team for 11 straight years. Yeah, ku fans wouldn't celebrate that at all.

but alas, when you have one great year then fall back the next year like ku constantly does, it can be hard to relate...i understand.



 :lol:



That's not even close to a good comparison.  ku's '07 team was better than anything K-State football has put on the field.  Period.  You never even competed for a National Championship.  You had six straight 11-win seasons.  Congrats.  That doesn't compare to winning the National Championship, believe me.  You'll never understand what it's like until you experience one for yourself. 

ku has a chance to go 8-5 this year and will have been bowl eligible 4 out of the last 5 years.  ku should be one of the favorites to win the North again next year and I wouldn't be surprised if this program started winning 8-10 games a season.  K-State is in desperation mode after hiring a 70 year-old Bill Snyder and your '09 recruiting class is a joke. 

Enjoy bowl season sitting at home watching K-State basketball.

 :lol:

Its unreal how much dumb sh*t BMW said this past year.
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

November 17, 2009, 10:36:56 PM
Reply #223

WildCatzPhreak

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 713
  • Personal Text
    Angry KSU Fan.
Great bump.  Take notes, cubs.

November 18, 2009, 02:28:36 AM
Reply #224

chuckleberry

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 125
  • Personal Text
    f*ck you bob huggins
lets keep this thread at the top...mods can we like pin this thread or something....i know bmw has said some really stupid stuff but this takes the cake and any time you have a retard fan calling out a former all conference player u have to pin it. i heard it is the law!!!! 

November 18, 2009, 08:31:09 AM
Reply #225

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459
17-10


with no talent

14-4 against ku


with Snyder back just accept it ku phans.
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin

November 18, 2009, 09:34:49 AM
Reply #226

Oklahoma_Cat

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4415
  • Personal Text
    ANGRY AS F*CK
In BMW's defense, he did get the part right about "Enjoy bowl season sitting at home watching K-State basketball"

 :skillz: