Ben has a real opportunity to absolutley pwn us hard if he would just ante up.
Commas are pretty small, so of course not.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Here be my thoughts. ksu is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north. The O has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the D will not stay in a comma the whole season.ksu 49ku 17
I know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts. ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north. The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season. ku 49KSU 17
Quote from: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 08:18:21 AMI know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts. ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north. The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season. ku 49KSU 17huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATS
Quote from: TRAIN on November 04, 2009, 09:09:48 AMQuote from: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 08:18:21 AMI know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts. ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north. The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season. ku 49KSU 17huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATSthey haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU. So yeah, they are playing pretty good. The O just needs to get them off the field. They faced over 70 plays against TT. That makes any D look pretty bad. But they were still held to under 300 yards by ku's D.
"they haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU"So, that 356 surrendered to Tech didn't happen? What about that 337 to OU? 322 to Colorado? I guess next you are going to tell me that 512 ISU ran up never happened either?
I think he had 35-21.he's bringing it pretty weak.He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams. He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.he lost that opportunity. now he just looks like a puss.
Quote from: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 09:17:07 AMQuote from: TRAIN on November 04, 2009, 09:09:48 AMQuote from: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 08:18:21 AMI know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts. ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north. The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season. ku 49KSU 17huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATSthey haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU. So yeah, they are playing pretty good. The O just needs to get them off the field. They faced over 70 plays against TT. That makes any D look pretty bad. But they were still held to under 300 yards by ku's D.First of all your stats are just plain wrong. Tech had 358 yards against ku, OU had 337, and CU had 322 yards so you've given up more then 312 in every game since ISU. You've given up more then 30 points in each of these games. Your yardage totals get helped by th fact that you've given up very short field scores and defensive scores. This is one reason why total yards isn't always the best indicator of how well you play. Throw a pick six every time you have the ball and you won't give up many yards. KSU didn't give up a ton of yards in the first quarter to OU but gave up 21 points because they had short fields. In the second half we gave up a gobs of yards but only allowed 14 points because they had long field. We need to give ku long fields and let them have their yards because they don't mean much without points.
Quote from: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AM now he just looks like a puss. Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.
now he just looks like a puss.
Quote from: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AMI think he had 35-21.he's bringing it pretty weak.He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams. He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.he lost that opportunity. now he just looks like a puss.Dead on. If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory? Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.
Quote from: LimestoneOutcropping on November 04, 2009, 09:51:48 AMQuote from: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AMI think he had 35-21.he's bringing it pretty weak.He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams. He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.he lost that opportunity. now he just looks like a puss.Dead on. If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory? Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything he's said is already proven wrong. He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season. All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching. Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year. But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said.
Quote from: Legore on November 04, 2009, 10:03:56 AMQuote from: LimestoneOutcropping on November 04, 2009, 09:51:48 AMQuote from: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AMI think he had 35-21.he's bringing it pretty weak.He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams. He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.he lost that opportunity. now he just looks like a puss.Dead on. If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory? Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything he's said is already proven wrong. He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season. All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching. Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year. But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. Good point. Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board. But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had. He clearly doesn't know much about the sport is a squawktard.
Quote from: Legore on November 04, 2009, 10:03:56 AMQuote from: LimestoneOutcropping on November 04, 2009, 09:51:48 AMQuote from: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AMI think he had 35-21.he's bringing it pretty weak.He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams. He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.he lost that opportunity. now he just looks like a puss.Dead on. If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory? Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything he's said is already proven wrong. He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season. All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching. Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year. But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. Good point. Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board. But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had. He clearly doesn't know much about the sport is a bandwagon fan.
Quote from: Legore on November 04, 2009, 10:03:56 AMQuote from: LimestoneOutcropping on November 04, 2009, 09:51:48 AMQuote from: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AMI think he had 35-21.he's bringing it pretty weak.He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams. He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.he lost that opportunity. now he just looks like a puss.Dead on. If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory? Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything he's said is already proven wrong. He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season. All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching. Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year. But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. Good point. Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board. But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had. He clearly doesn't know much about the sport.