Date: 29/08/25 - 14:25 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: What if we had Patterson?  (Read 384 times)

September 13, 2009, 08:28:51 AM
Read 384 times

FHSU92

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2625
If we wouldn't have Fitzed-up the Patterson deal, would we be in better shape?  Would like to know who he would have brought in for QB this year.   :crybaby:

September 13, 2009, 08:31:26 AM
Reply #1

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.

September 13, 2009, 08:32:08 AM
Reply #2

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

September 13, 2009, 10:22:31 AM
Reply #3

jester66

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1585
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

September 13, 2009, 10:23:58 AM
Reply #4

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

2?  Name 1.  I can't think of any.

September 13, 2009, 10:26:38 AM
Reply #5

Perry

  • Guest
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

2?  Name 1.  I can't think of any.

'spose he's referring to Harper and then for the other I guess Lamur, based off of rumors of him playing well @ qb in practice. That or he believes we've got C-Newt in the bag :dunno:

September 13, 2009, 10:32:26 AM
Reply #6

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

2?  Name 1.  I can't think of any.

'spose he's referring to Harper and then for the other I guess Lamur, based off of rumors of him playing well @ qb in practice. That or he believes we've got C-Newt in the bag :dunno:

I think we can all agree than any "report" about any of the quarterbacks on our roster looking "good" in practice are complete and total bullcrap.  Think about it, the best two presumably played last night. 

Adam &@#%ing Barmann would start for this team.

September 13, 2009, 11:07:27 AM
Reply #7

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Evridge would be team mvp.  Srsly.
ksufanscopycat my friends.