Date: 15/08/25 - 10:31 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Is KCStar.com the worst website on the interwebs?  (Read 1015 times)

May 06, 2009, 09:26:52 AM
Read 1015 times

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile
Rhetorical question, of course it is!  Every single page takes 30-40 seconds to load... the pictures on the website are about 3K in data and are blown up to the point where you see each pixel...  the site has pop-up adds that take over the page that you can't avoid.  As much as I want to read their stories, it's almost too painful to use the website.

How can a supposedly major metropolitan newspaper have a website that is so damn pathetic?  It's like they're trying to make it unusable.   Anyone else have "issues" with that website?   :yuck:
« Last Edit: May 06, 2009, 09:29:59 AM by Ghost of Stan Parrish »
每個人一野貓!

May 06, 2009, 09:31:09 AM
Reply #1

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
How can a supposedly major metropolitan newspaper

Well, just about every newspaper in the country is getting ready to go under so they are prolly grasping at straws at this point.  It's not like they can afford an army of tech people to make it better.
<---------Click the ball

May 06, 2009, 09:34:59 AM
Reply #2

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
Rhetorical question, of course it is!  Every single page takes 30-40 seconds to load... the pictures on the website are about 3K in data and are blown up to the point where you see each pixel...  the site has pop-up adds that take over the page that you can't avoid.  As much as I want to read their stories, it's almost too painful to use the website.

How can a supposedly major metropolitan newspaper have a website that is so damn pathetic?  It's like they're trying to make it unusable.   Anyone else have "issues" with that website?   :yuck:

how much do you pay to access their website and its information? 


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

May 06, 2009, 09:41:35 AM
Reply #3

Bhyaaaaa!

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 753
  • Personal Text
    So freaking board right now
    • imageshack
Rhetorical question, of course it is!  Every single page takes 30-40 seconds to load... the pictures on the website are about 3K in data and are blown up to the point where you see each pixel...  the site has pop-up adds that take over the page that you can't avoid.  As much as I want to read their stories, it's almost too painful to use the website.

How can a supposedly major metropolitan newspaper have a website that is so damn pathetic?  It's like they're trying to make it unusable.   Anyone else have "issues" with that website?   :yuck:

how much do you pay to access their website and its information? 

Exactly. The quickest way to make it better is to buy a subscription to the newspaper.

May 06, 2009, 09:42:26 AM
Reply #4

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile
Rhetorical question, of course it is!  Every single page takes 30-40 seconds to load... the pictures on the website are about 3K in data and are blown up to the point where you see each pixel...  the site has pop-up adds that take over the page that you can't avoid.  As much as I want to read their stories, it's almost too painful to use the website.

How can a supposedly major metropolitan newspaper have a website that is so damn pathetic?  It's like they're trying to make it unusable.   Anyone else have "issues" with that website?   :yuck:

how much do you pay to access their website and its information? 

Point taken, but somehow the Capitol Journal (and most every other newspaper) manages to have a website that runs more smoothly, and I pay the same for them.  Without getting into the value to me from the KCStar per money spent (infinite), in comparison to other websites theirs is downright pathetic.
每個人一野貓!

May 06, 2009, 09:43:54 AM
Reply #5

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile

Exactly. The quickest way to make it better is to buy a subscription to the newspaper.

I live a few hundred miles away, so I'm doing that.
每個人一野貓!

May 06, 2009, 09:44:42 AM
Reply #6

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment

Exactly. The quickest way to make it better is to buy a subscription to the newspaper.

I live a few hundred miles away, so I'm doing that.

I thought you lived in NYC  :confused:
<---------Click the ball

May 06, 2009, 09:46:55 AM
Reply #7

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile

Exactly. The quickest way to make it better is to buy a subscription to the newspaper.

I live a few hundred miles away, so I'm doing that.

I thought you lived in NYC  :confused:

Yes.  I meant to type "so I'm NOT doing that (subscribing)". 
每個人一野貓!

May 06, 2009, 09:58:36 AM
Reply #8

Bhyaaaaa!

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 753
  • Personal Text
    So freaking board right now
    • imageshack

Exactly. The quickest way to make it better is to buy a subscription to the newspaper.

I live a few hundred miles away, so I'm doing that.

I thought you lived in NYC  :confused:

Yes.  I meant to type "so I'm NOT doing that (subscribing)". 

I live in Brooklyn <- also don't subscribe, but used to so I feel a little better?

But then again I used to pay for CD's but now I mostly just download those illegally. So I guess I'm just a bastard.

May 06, 2009, 10:08:09 AM
Reply #9

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
Rhetorical question, of course it is!  Every single page takes 30-40 seconds to load... the pictures on the website are about 3K in data and are blown up to the point where you see each pixel...  the site has pop-up adds that take over the page that you can't avoid.  As much as I want to read their stories, it's almost too painful to use the website.

How can a supposedly major metropolitan newspaper have a website that is so damn pathetic?  It's like they're trying to make it unusable.   Anyone else have "issues" with that website?   :yuck:

how much do you pay to access their website and its information? 

Point taken, but somehow the Capitol Journal (and most every other newspaper) manages to have a website that runs more smoothly, and I pay the same for them.  Without getting into the value to me from the KCStar per money spent (infinite), in comparison to other websites theirs is downright pathetic.
i have no idea what the economics of running a newspaper are but my guess is that the bigger newspapers have lower profit margins.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

May 06, 2009, 10:10:59 AM
Reply #10

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile

I live in Brooklyn

Lived all over Brooklyn myself: Park Slope, Prospect Heights, Williamsburg, Greenpoint.  Also, LIC right on the border.
每個人一野貓!

May 06, 2009, 10:14:59 AM
Reply #11

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile

i have no idea what the economics of running a newspaper are but my guess is that the bigger newspapers have lower profit margins.

Could be.  I love the newspaper biz: I wrote a bit for the Mercury when I was at MHS, and thought about majoring in journalism (thank god I didn't).  So, I guess I shouldn't be picking on the Star when papers are failing all over the place.   Sorry, Star!   :shy:  (But, hey, the website does suck.)
每個人一野貓!

May 06, 2009, 10:34:32 AM
Reply #12

Bhyaaaaa!

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 753
  • Personal Text
    So freaking board right now
    • imageshack

I live in Brooklyn

Lived all over Brooklyn myself: Park Slope, Prospect Heights, Williamsburg, Greenpoint.  Also, LIC right on the border.

Nice. I've relocated to Williamsburg a couple of months ago - South 4th and Bedford. It's a good spot. Right by the bridge - I bike it every morning to work.  How long did you live here? 

May 06, 2009, 12:57:45 PM
Reply #13

Pike

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2603
My K-State Webmail can take up to 5 minutes to log in. Makes me late to class sometimes  :curse: :curse: :curse:

May 06, 2009, 01:47:03 PM
Reply #14

Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1057
    • My profile

Nice. I've relocated to Williamsburg a couple of months ago - South 4th and Bedford. It's a good spot. Right by the bridge - I bike it every morning to work.  How long did you live here? 

Lived in Williamsburg for two years from 2000 to 2002.  Diner was still a new place when I arrived, and it was about the only place I ever went to on your south side (other than Lugers once).  The neighborhood has obviously changed a lot since then.

Once, about three years ago, I was meeting a girl at a bar in your hood called Southside on a Friday evening down under the bridge.  While I was walking down the street, I was asked by one of the Hassidm to come up to his family's apartment to turn some lights on.  (Shabbos.)  I agreed, and was rewarded with some nice homemade brownies and clementines.  That same night I met the bass player for Evanescence at that bar, and some of my friends (not me) went out with the full band the next night after their show for the quasi-rock star treatment.  It's an interesting hood you live in.
每個人一野貓!