Date: 05/08/25 - 05:11 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Weiser coming back  (Read 1703 times)

February 28, 2009, 10:14:19 AM
Reply #30

rundown87

  • Guest

February 28, 2009, 03:12:35 PM
Reply #31

RockyMtnCat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 74
  • Personal Text
    GoPowercat Ring of Fame Member
tim weiser was a bad AD???*

sheesh. 

you sewer rats will complain about anything



x

February 28, 2009, 03:19:29 PM
Reply #32

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Yep . . . dude completely drug his feet on everything, costing K-State major momentum, jeopardizing facility projects and costing K-State a basketball coach.

Great AD . . . pfft.


February 28, 2009, 05:38:51 PM
Reply #33

omahawildcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 257
I'm okay with weiser- He raised ksu's athletic budget, had the budget looking good, wasn't a big spender because ksu doesn't have the cash flow to be big spenders.  This guy got Bob Huggins to come to lowly Manhattan, KS and he showed how much he cares for this University the day that Huggins hit the bricks (was one pissed off hombre).  I have friends that are football coaches and go to the ksu coaching clinics- people there say that Weiser was great to work with and was willing to listen and consider almost anything.  If you don't want a Timid AD donate your F**king money.  Supposedly Weiser had an interview set up with Gary Patterson when Snyder retired and Wefald pulled the rug out from under him and hired Prince and he also wanted to fire Wooly a year earlier from when he really was fired and Wefald wouldn't let him.  In my opinion Weiser wasn't the problem, it is Wefald who has turned into KSU's Al Davis.

I really have to disagree with you.  Huggins was looking at us or Mizzou.  It wouldnt take a lot to get a despirate coach here. 

He did a terrible job of expanding the KSU athletics brand.  His emphasis on club sports has really hurt us.  We could have had nationally recognized programs but they are only "clubs". 

Weiser and Weefer are equally responsible for the prince experiement. 

I highly doubt that K-state had any opportunity to gain enough resources to make any other club sports into "recognized programs" Hell it's hard enough to do that with football and basketball. Who f'n cares about wrestling or softball anyway? Both sports are worse to watch then womens basketball.

February 28, 2009, 10:29:27 PM
Reply #34

ednksu

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1935
I'm okay with weiser- He raised ksu's athletic budget, had the budget looking good, wasn't a big spender because ksu doesn't have the cash flow to be big spenders.  This guy got Bob Huggins to come to lowly Manhattan, KS and he showed how much he cares for this University the day that Huggins hit the bricks (was one pissed off hombre).  I have friends that are football coaches and go to the ksu coaching clinics- people there say that Weiser was great to work with and was willing to listen and consider almost anything.  If you don't want a Timid AD donate your F**king money.  Supposedly Weiser had an interview set up with Gary Patterson when Snyder retired and Wefald pulled the rug out from under him and hired Prince and he also wanted to fire Wooly a year earlier from when he really was fired and Wefald wouldn't let him.  In my opinion Weiser wasn't the problem, it is Wefald who has turned into KSU's Al Davis.

I really have to disagree with you.  Huggins was looking at us or Mizzou.  It wouldnt take a lot to get a despirate coach here. 

He did a terrible job of expanding the KSU athletics brand.  His emphasis on club sports has really hurt us.  We could have had nationally recognized programs but they are only "clubs". 

Weiser and Weefer are equally responsible for the prince experiement. 

I highly doubt that K-state had any opportunity to gain enough resources to make any other club sports into "recognized programs" Hell it's hard enough to do that with football and basketball. Who f'n cares about wrestling or softball anyway? Both sports are worse to watch then womens basketball.

think about it though.  The UTs and FSUs of the world have every sport it seems and they are all good.   We have great clubs teams that compete nationally with minimal budgets from SGA.  With minor funding from the AD we could have national ranked programs and grow the brand.
Be a winner today

February 28, 2009, 11:18:51 PM
Reply #35

powercat5000

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 259
KSU has the minimum number of sports allowed by that Title 9 rule I believe

March 01, 2009, 01:36:22 AM
Reply #36

snyderfanatic

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 685
Kevin Lockett next AD
 :powertard: :kstatriot: :ksu: