CollegeHoops.net

[jarrr]

http://www.collegehoopsnet.com/preview/2006/

NIT

[Saulbadguy]

Honestly, I would not be all that upset with an NIT bid as long as we make a run in it.

I'm really having second thoughts about this season.  We don't have "the players" that Huggs needs to compete for championships, IMO.

[wildcat79]

Re: CollegeHoops.net
« Reply #1 on: Today at 08:18:39 AM »
[Reply with quote]
Honestly, I would not be all that upset with an NIT bid as long as we make a run in it.

I'm really having second thoughts about this season.  We don't have "the players" that Huggs needs to compete for championships, IMO.

Who did? They could very well make the NCAA but win ? Nawh. Table should ge set for a great run the following year. JMO
 

[snart]

That ranking service has a long history of being so far off the mark that I would only worry if they rated us high.  Let’s see, last year they had Florida at #56, UCLA at #16, LSU at #24, and George Mason at #95.  Wow.  Only one of the final four teams in their top-20 and the national champion ranked #56.

[ds43fan]

That ranking service has a long history of being so far off the mark that I would only worry if they rated us high.  Let’s see, last year they had Florida at #56, UCLA at #16, LSU at #24, and George Mason at #95.  Wow.  Only one of the final four teams in their top-20 and the national champion ranked #56.

damn were ranked 57