Date: 03/08/25 - 15:02 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Coffman at WR?  (Read 494 times)

October 26, 2008, 10:22:13 PM
Read 494 times

phicat1448

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1080
  • Personal Text
    7-5 ^idiot
Could it work?
Has Ronjim considered it?

It could help Coffman learn the offense he is going to take over next year while giving us someone to help out Deon and the little guy.

October 26, 2008, 10:31:06 PM
Reply #1

Oklahoma_Cat

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4415
  • Personal Text
    ANGRY AS F*CK
Why?  That seems very pointless.  Banks and Murphy are doing ok, and Pierce steps in from time to time.  Putting Coffman at WR does seem like something idiotic that Ron would do, though.  The offense isn't broke (besides the running game...but ya know).

October 26, 2008, 10:41:20 PM
Reply #2

KCcat28

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2682
  • Personal Text
    All Rise... The Judge is in the house.
Have you seen how skinny Coffman is? No that would be so stupid.

October 26, 2008, 11:09:59 PM
Reply #3

phicat1448

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1080
  • Personal Text
    7-5 ^idiot
Why?  That seems very pointless.  Banks and Murphy are doing ok, and Pierce steps in from time to time.  Putting Coffman at WR does seem like something idiotic that Ron would do, though.  The offense isn't broke (besides the running game...but ya know).

Yeah I agree with this but I feel putting him in here and there would not be a horrible idea if he showed he was decent at it in practice.  I feel it would give him a head start for next year (experience speaking).

October 26, 2008, 11:50:13 PM
Reply #4

Sal Paradise

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 71
Right after we move Dee Bell to left tackle. 
 

October 27, 2008, 12:56:11 AM
Reply #5

JR Ewing

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 577
  Putting Coffman at WR does seem like something idiotic that Ron would do, though. 

I can see the quotes now about getting all of your "weapons" on the field, followed by a line about how they call him "Slash" in the locker room.  You have to admit, though, throwing him out at the WR spot would be bold and daring.
Once you get past the ethics, the rest is easy.

October 27, 2008, 01:10:30 AM
Reply #6

Skydog

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1646
Why?  That seems very pointless.  Banks and Murphy are doing ok, and Pierce steps in from time to time.  Putting Coffman at WR does seem like something idiotic that Ron would do, though.  The offense isn't broke (besides the running game...but ya know).

Yeah, Banks is decent I guess.  :rolleyes:

October 27, 2008, 02:46:59 AM
Reply #7

JTKSU

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7178
  • Personal Text
    Gettin' angried up!!!
Why?  That seems very pointless.  Banks and Murphy are doing ok, and Pierce steps in from time to time.  Putting Coffman at WR does seem like something idiotic that Ron would do, though.  The offense isn't broke (besides the running game...but ya know).

Yeah I agree with this but I feel putting him in here and there would not be a horrible idea if he showed he was decent at it in practice.  I feel it would give him a head start for next year (experience speaking).

QFT.  He might as well get used to getting his head beat in, play after play.