Date: 06/08/25 - 17:46 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Over/Under  (Read 686 times)

May 30, 2007, 09:45:57 AM
Read 686 times

ERA7777

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 377
  • Personal Text
    Toonces - The Original EMAW
What would you set the over/under at for ppg next season for:

Hoskins

Beasley

Walker

I'd probably go w/ 14, 19, and 16.  Could be better though.

May 30, 2007, 10:11:22 AM
Reply #1

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
14
eleventy-billion
38
<---------Click the ball

May 30, 2007, 10:15:20 AM
Reply #2

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
I can see Mike going off on some poor noncon team for like 40-50.  I think he's going to be 20-23ish average ppg.  Hoskins at 14 sounds good.  Walker at 16-18.

May 30, 2007, 12:20:21 PM
Reply #3

StayOutOfTrees

  • Guest
Hoskins - 14

Beasley - 22

Walker - 17

May 30, 2007, 12:23:41 PM
Reply #4

SUPERKSUFAN

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3860
Hoskins - 14

Beasley - 22

Walker - 17


that looks good to me   :thumbsup:

May 30, 2007, 01:05:50 PM
Reply #5

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Hoskins - 27 ppg, 11 rpg

Beasley - 58 ppg, 22 rpg, 7 bpg

Walker - 42 ppg, 14 rpg

Pullen - A/TO ratio - 29/0, 13 spg

Sutton - 2ppg, 1 rpg

May 30, 2007, 01:06:20 PM
Reply #6

ScubaSteve

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 714
14
eleventy-billion
38

Or as my 6-year old says...

40-finity

May 30, 2007, 01:35:33 PM
Reply #7

snart

  • Guest
Hoskins - 12
Beasley - 19
Walker - 17
Young - 12
Pullen - 8
Sutton - 9
Stewart - 8
Brown - 6
Samuels - 5
Colon - 4
Patzwald - 1
Kent < 1
Merrriewether < 1
Gilbert < 1

May 30, 2007, 01:41:22 PM
Reply #8

snart

  • Guest
Wow!  That's over 101 points per game!  It's going to be a good year!

May 30, 2007, 01:44:06 PM
Reply #9

PowercatPosse

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 808
Beasley 18
Walker 15
Hoskins 14

May 30, 2007, 01:46:59 PM
Reply #10

snart

  • Guest
OK.  With an eye toward really these are my revised figures:

Hoskins - 10
Beasley - 18
Walker - 15
Young - 10
Pullen - 6
Sutton - 8
Stewart - 6
Brown - 4
Samuels - 3
Colon - 3
Patzwald - 1
Kent < 1
Merrriewether < 1
Gilbert < 1

That’s still over 84 points per game though!  It’s still going to be a good year...

May 30, 2007, 02:20:53 PM
Reply #11

frankencat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 639
  • Personal Text
    Aren't I a cute cub ?
Walker will outscore Beasley

Write it down

May 30, 2007, 02:23:30 PM
Reply #12

BullHawkWheel

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1834
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.

May 30, 2007, 02:26:47 PM
Reply #13

SUPERKSUFAN

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3860
you remind me of the picture posted of Britt Spears....sad  :ku:

May 30, 2007, 02:36:15 PM
Reply #14

kimballcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 57
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.

 Revised 3 point line?  :ustupid:  You may want to do a little more research on when that rule will be implemented.

May 30, 2007, 02:38:27 PM
Reply #15

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.

 Revised 3 point line?  :ustupid:  You may want to do a little more research on when that rule will be implemented.

Give him a break, he flunked out of ku. 
<---------Click the ball

May 30, 2007, 02:50:26 PM
Reply #16

PowerCatNation

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 139
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.
Still living in the past huh, thats pretty sad

May 30, 2007, 03:10:21 PM
Reply #17

BullHawkWheel

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1834
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

May 30, 2007, 03:14:25 PM
Reply #18

ksutwisted

  • Guest
My dad can beat up your dad.....

run home now.

May 30, 2007, 03:16:24 PM
Reply #19

doom

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 9952
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

Horseballs.


I still want my cooler, bitches!

May 30, 2007, 03:21:03 PM
Reply #20

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

Horseballs.

Yeah, that's a pretty bold guaruntee considering ku's leading scorer switches between four people regularly(Rush, Chalmers, Arthur, Collins) and us bringing Beasley in.

May 30, 2007, 03:24:40 PM
Reply #21

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

Horseballs.

Yeah, that's a pretty bold guaruntee considering ku's leading scorer switches between four people regularly(Rush, Chalmers, Arthur, Collins) and us bringing Beasley in.
Not to mention, we had two guys average more than their leading scorer did last year. Cartier (17.1) and Hoskins (14.5) both averaged more than Rush (13.8).

May 30, 2007, 03:29:00 PM
Reply #22

snart

  • Guest
Quote
Not to mention, we had two guys average more than their leading scorer did last year.

Don’t confuse the Bong with either statistics or reality because he is too %$#@! stupid for statistics and too delusional for reality...

May 30, 2007, 03:42:51 PM
Reply #23

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
Quote
Not to mention, we had two guys average more than their leading scorer did last year.

Don’t confuse the Bong with either statistics or reality because he is too %$#@! stupid for statistics and too delusional for reality...

Oh well, McDonalds probably doesn't even require a GED.
<---------Click the ball

May 30, 2007, 03:56:02 PM
Reply #24

ERA7777

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 377
  • Personal Text
    Toonces - The Original EMAW
I'll go ahead and guarantee that ku averages more missed layups and more handchecks than every team in the big 12.  Possibly the big 12 combined.  Those dirty fu*ks  :adored:

Oh, and it might be hard for anyone on ku's roster to average more points than next year's POY. :koolaid:

Thank you, that is all.