KSUFans Archives
Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: michigancat on March 12, 2007, 02:24:34 PM
-
I like it. Give out the automatic bid in December.
Play the last conference games the last Saturday before selection Sunday.
It would rock.
-
I agree.
-
100% love the idea but 100% sure that Weiberg would never pull such a forward thinking move.
-
pick a name out of a hat
i like that idea better :chirp:
-
this is a compelling idea.
i'll start a new thread on it.
-
We're going to get a new thread spawned from each of Kietz's talking points this afternoon, I see.
-
Works for me.
-
I don't get it. The winner would suck ass the rest of the season.
-
Good idea. Not exactly new though. Don't know how the NCAA would handle a mid-season conference tournament, they haven't been done since the 70s when the NCAA tournament and selection was completely different.
-
So whoever is playing the best basketball in December gets the auto bid?
How is that better than the current situation? It seems at least as arbitrary, if not more.
-
So whoever is playing the best basketball in December gets the auto bid?
How is that better than the current situation? It seems at least as arbitrary, if not more.
Yeah, that's what you do. It makes the tournament matter more because the committee has time to take all games into consideration. We would get more credit for our Texas Tech win back then than we do now.
-
Tech beat us back in Jan 8th and that game was more important than our win vs. them last week.
-
That idea is so incredibly stupid. If the Big 12 tourney is in December, call it the Holiday Tournament and have it just be that...a tournament. Have the Holiday tournament and don't play the year end tournament and award the conference bid to the Big 12 regular season champion (use the freaking tie breakers).
...Or don't have either tourney (holiday or end of year) and go to full schedule so we don't have to deal with the "unbalanced schedule" crap.
-
How do you figure out seeds?
DUMB.
-
Isn't the thrust of the current system that teams that "turn it on late" in a "tournament setting" get to qualify and teams that "fade down the stretch" are forced to rely on their resume? Putting it in December seems, as I said, at least as arbitrary as having it at all and probably more so.
-
How do you figure out seeds?
Either:
a) Last year's finish
b) draw out of a hat
c) Random committee
Isn't the thrust of the current system that teams that "turn it on late" in a "tournament setting" get to qualify and teams that "fade down the stretch" are forced to rely on their resume? Putting it in December seems, as I said, at least as arbitrary as having it at all and probably more so.
Why can't you "turn it on late" with a late conference stretch?
-
didn't the old old big 8 or 7 have a pre-season tourney? I can't condone awarding the auto-bid that early though.
Either way the Selection committee is going to move the bar around differently each year to fit whatever their agenda is, and their agenda will never look kindly on KSU.
-
How do you figure out seeds?
Either:
a) Last year's finish
b) draw out of a hat
c) Random committee
Isn't the thrust of the current system that teams that "turn it on late" in a "tournament setting" get to qualify and teams that "fade down the stretch" are forced to rely on their resume? Putting it in December seems, as I said, at least as arbitrary as having it at all and probably more so.
Why can't you "turn it on late" with a late conference stretch?
You could use the coaches' preseason poll.
-
How do you figure out seeds?
Either:
a) Last year's finish
b) draw out of a hat
c) Random committee
Isn't the thrust of the current system that teams that "turn it on late" in a "tournament setting" get to qualify and teams that "fade down the stretch" are forced to rely on their resume? Putting it in December seems, as I said, at least as arbitrary as having it at all and probably more so.
Why can't you "turn it on late" with a late conference stretch?
You could use the coaches' preseason poll.
That would work, too.
-
I really can't believe how retarded a December tournament with an automatic bid would be....If the MVC did this, WSU would've been in the NCAA tournament.
If the NCAA awarded the automatic bid to the team that was the best in it's league, KSU would be in because the 4 or 5 spots taken by scrub teams that managed to eek out wins in their tournament (after the overrated mid major team lost) would've gone to Syracuse and KSU.
-
How do you figure out seeds?
Either:
a) Last year's finish
b) draw out of a hat
c) Random committee
Isn't the thrust of the current system that teams that "turn it on late" in a "tournament setting" get to qualify and teams that "fade down the stretch" are forced to rely on their resume? Putting it in December seems, as I said, at least as arbitrary as having it at all and probably more so.
Why can't you "turn it on late" with a late conference stretch?
ku's "down the stretch games" this year (assuming no Big XII title):
@ K-State, Iowa St, at Oklahoma, #15 Texas
Texas A&M:
at Oklahoma, at Oklahoma St, Baylor, at #15 Texas
Texas:
Texas Tech, at Oklahoma, #6 Texas A&M, at #3 Kansas
Kansas State:
#6 Kansas, at Colorado, at Oklahoma St, Oklahoma
Tech:
Oklahoma St Baylor at Iowa St Colorado
Wow, I guess Tech really "turned it on" there at the end of the season!
Arbitrary, stupid.
-
I really can't believe how retarded a December tournament with an automatic bid would be....If the MVC did this, WSU would've been in the NCAA tournament.
Considering they started 1-4 in conference, I'd say that's doubtful.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
-
I really can't believe how retarded a December tournament with an automatic bid would be....If the MVC did this, WSU would've been in the NCAA tournament.
Considering they started 1-4 in conference, I'd say that's doubtful.
Right before Christmas (which is when the Holiday tournament would be) they were #8 in the country and playing good basketball. It wasn't until Vegas that they went on the downslide.
Winning your regular season conference (over a period of 2-3 months) should matter more than winning over a 2-3 day period. It's insanely stupid to even give the automatic bid to the conference tourney champion.
-
I really can't believe how retarded a December tournament with an automatic bid would be....If the MVC did this, WSU would've been in the NCAA tournament.
Considering they started 1-4 in conference, I'd say that's doubtful.
Right before Christmas (which is when the Holiday tournament would be) they were #8 in the country and playing good basketball. It wasn't until Vegas that they went on the downslide.
Winning your regular season conference (over a period of 2-3 months) should matter more than winning over a 2-3 day period. It's insanely stupid to even give the automatic bid to the conference tourney champion.
I would lean this way. Give auto-bids to regular season conference champions. For the mid-majors tournament champions get auto-NIT bids. Otherwise they have to lean on the merits of their resume like everyone else does.
-
This idea is just as dumb as Kevin's idea that it would be better for baseball teams to start their relievers and then bring in the starter in the middle innings.
Hell, why don't we have a horse competition in October on the night of Midnight Madness to determine the automatic bid? It would get all kinds of media attention and then we could have our autobid given away before any games are actually played. It would be so forward thinking.
-
I really can't believe how retarded a December tournament with an automatic bid would be....If the MVC did this, WSU would've been in the NCAA tournament.
Considering they started 1-4 in conference, I'd say that's doubtful.
Right before Christmas (which is when the Holiday tournament would be) they were #8 in the country and playing good basketball. It wasn't until Vegas that they went on the downslide.
Their "downslide" started because they started playing teams better than they were. Their early OOC run was fool's gold.
Winning your regular season conference (over a period of 2-3 months) should matter more than winning over a 2-3 day period. It's insanely stupid to even give the automatic bid to the conference tourney champion.
I agree, and I think Trim's idea of eliminating the tourney and playing an balanced schedule is best. However, too much money is made on the conference tourney...it won't go away any time soon.
-
Rusty you going to respond to my post?
-
Rusty you going to respond to my post?
I don't understand what you're talking about.
-
Don't see how this would solve anything.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
Yes.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
-
Dumb.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
I'm cool with all of that. Personally, I'd trade 6 crappy OOC games for a chance to see Kevin Durant live, see Bobby Knight every year, and get an extra freebie win against Baylor.
Also, Pac 10 coaches only complained when they started the postseason tournament.
-
Rusty you going to respond to my post?
I don't understand what you're talking about.
You said that conference tourney = scheduled conference games "down the stretch."
The schedule for Tech in their last four regular season games was pathetically easy and featured ONE road game @ ISU. Texas had a bear of a schedule and I'd put us and ku somewhere in between.
My point is tournaments have seeds and thus the schedule is virtually guaranteed to get tough "down the stretch" because the good teams advance. The schedule of each individual team isn't designed to get tougher down the stretch and there is no way it could satisfy every team's needs.
Thus conference tourney at end of the year less arbitrary and thus better representation of a team "turning it on down the stretch" than randomly assigned conference games that happen to fall at the end of the schedule. Tech benefitted from a weak final four games, it was arbitrary I don't know why you want to move the tourney up to December and let the "last 10 games" thing and "last 5" and "turning it on at the end" (which seem to me to be a bigger deal than whatever slight benefit is gained from moving up the conference tourney and auto-bid etc.) and so radically change everything else.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
Yeah, terrified. ku hasn't had any success against the South since the formation of the league.
-
You said that conference tourney = scheduled conference games "down the stretch."
The schedule for Tech in their last four regular season games was pathetically easy and featured ONE road game @ ISU. Texas had a bear of a schedule and I'd put us and ku somewhere in between.
My point is tournaments have seeds and thus the schedule is virtually guaranteed to get tough "down the stretch" because the good teams advance. The schedule of each individual team isn't designed to get tougher down the stretch and there is no way it could satisfy every team's needs.
Thus conference tourney at end of the year less arbitrary and thus better representation of a team "turning it on down the stretch" than randomly assigned conference games that happen to fall at the end of the schedule. Tech benefitted from a weak final four games, it was arbitrary I don't know why you want to move the tourney up to December and let the "last 10 games" thing and "last 5" and "turning it on at the end" (which seem to me to be a bigger deal than whatever slight benefit is gained from moving up the conference tourney and auto-bid etc.) and so radically change everything else.
I think it should be the body of work no matter what, myself.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
I'm cool with all of that. Personally, I'd trade 6 crappy OOC games for a chance to see Kevin Durant live, see Bobby Knight every year, and get an extra freebie win against Baylor.
Also, Pac 10 coaches only complained when they started the postseason tournament.
Yes. My idea is still good even at the expense of 6 crapty OOC games.
But Rusty's argument is flawed in that I wouldn't give him my tickets to see Kevin Durant live or to see Bobby Knight each year.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
Yeah, terrified. ku hasn't had any success against the South on the road since the formation of the league.
There fixed it. What's the best road win in the South in the past 5 years? A&M last year? They were this year's K-State team last year. OSU sucked last year. You've gotten drilled against UT and OSU the last few times and lost to OU as well.
-
Yes. My idea is still good even at the expense of 6 @#%$ty OOC games.
But Rusty's argument is flawed in that I wouldn't give him my tickets to see Kevin Durant live or to see Bobby Knight each year.
I would almost consider PAYING to see them.
-
Yes. My idea is still good even at the expense of 6 @#%$ty OOC games.
But Rusty's argument is flawed in that I wouldn't give him my tickets to see Kevin Durant live or to see Bobby Knight each year.
I would almost consider PAYING to see them.
HOLY crap. That definitely means this idea has legs. ;)
-
What do you think of the SEC bracket? They keep their divisions seperate and seed each 1 through 6 and play it that way.
2007 SEC Tournament
Thursday, March 8 (First Round Matchups)
Game 1 [W5] Alabama vs. [E4] Kentucky 1 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 2 [E6] South Carolina vs. [W3] Arkansas 3:15 ET (LF)
Game 3 [E5] Georgia vs. [W4] Auburn 7:30 ET (LF)
Game 4 [W6] LSU vs. [E3] Tennessee 9:45 ET (LF)
Friday, March 9 (Second Round Matchups)
Game 5 [W1] Mississippi State vs. UA/uk winner 1 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 6 [E2] Vanderbilt vs. SC/AR winner 3:15 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 7 [E1] Florida vs. UG/AU winner 7:30 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 8 [W2] Ole Miss vs. LSU/UT winner 9:45 p.m. ET (LF)
Saturday, March 10 (Semifinals)
Game 9 Game 5 winner vs. Game 6 winner 1 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 10 Game 7 winner vs. Game 8 winner 3:15 p.m. ET (LF)
Sunday, March 11 (Finals)
Game 11 Championship Game 1 p.m. FT (CBS)
The ACC does it the same was as we do. Interesting to see a different way for the SEC by keeping their divisions seperate.
-
What do you think of the SEC bracket? They keep their divisions seperate and seed each 1 through 6 and play it that way.
2007 SEC Tournament
Thursday, March 8 (First Round Matchups)
Game 1 [W5] Alabama vs. [E4] Kentucky 1 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 2 [E6] South Carolina vs. [W3] Arkansas 3:15 ET (LF)
Game 3 [E5] Georgia vs. [W4] Auburn 7:30 ET (LF)
Game 4 [W6] LSU vs. [E3] Tennessee 9:45 ET (LF)
Friday, March 9 (Second Round Matchups)
Game 5 [W1] Mississippi State vs. UA/uk winner 1 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 6 [E2] Vanderbilt vs. SC/AR winner 3:15 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 7 [E1] Florida vs. UG/AU winner 7:30 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 8 [W2] Ole Miss vs. LSU/UT winner 9:45 p.m. ET (LF)
Saturday, March 10 (Semifinals)
Game 9 Game 5 winner vs. Game 6 winner 1 p.m. ET (LF)
Game 10 Game 7 winner vs. Game 8 winner 3:15 p.m. ET (LF)
Sunday, March 11 (Finals)
Game 11 Championship Game 1 p.m. FT (CBS)
The ACC does it the same was as we do. Interesting to see a different way for the SEC by keeping their divisions seperate.
Would have been the same result for us this year, except we would have played someone worse than Tech in our first game.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
Yeah, terrified. ku hasn't had any success against the South on the road since the formation of the league.
There fixed it. What's the best road win in the South in the past 5 years? A&M last year? They were this year's K-State team last year. OSU sucked last year. You've gotten drilled against UT and OSU the last few times and lost to OU as well.
The fact that you can pretty much point out every ku road loss to the South in one sentence pretty much makes my point for me. ku hasn't won 7 of 11 Big 12 titles by sucking on the road against the South. Also, ku doesn't seem to have much trouble winning the Big 12 tourney on a neutral site as they have the best all time record in that thing as well.
I don't want to play 22 conference games because you basically would have a non existent nonconference schedule.
-
Would have been the same result for us this year, except we would have played someone worse than Tech in our first game.
We would have been on A&M's side of the bracket, too.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
Yeah, terrified. ku hasn't had any success against the South on the road since the formation of the league.
There fixed it. What's the best road win in the South in the past 5 years? A&M last year? They were this year's K-State team last year. OSU sucked last year. You've gotten drilled against UT and OSU the last few times and lost to OU as well.
The fact that you can pretty much point out every ku road loss to the South in one sentence pretty much makes my point for me. ku hasn't won 7 of 11 5 Big 12 titles out right by sucking on the road against the South. Also, ku doesn't seem to have much trouble winning the Big 12 tourney on a neutral site as they have the best all time record in that thing as well.
I don't want to play 22 conference games because you basically would have a non existent nonconference schedule.
There, fixed it. This year was the first year you actually won it out right since 02-03? Yeah, an unbalanced schedule doesn't help. And it's not like your OOC was all that tough. You left home, what, twice? Against Florida (W) and against DePaul (L)?
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
Yeah, terrified. ku hasn't had any success against the South on the road since the formation of the league.
There fixed it. What's the best road win in the South in the past 5 years? A&M last year? They were this year's K-State team last year. OSU sucked last year. You've gotten drilled against UT and OSU the last few times and lost to OU as well.
The fact that you can pretty much point out every ku road loss to the South in one sentence pretty much makes my point for me. ku hasn't won 7 of 11 5 Big 12 titles out right by sucking on the road against the South. Also, ku doesn't seem to have much trouble winning the Big 12 tourney on a neutral site as they have the best all time record in that thing as well.
I don't want to play 22 conference games because you basically would have a non existent nonconference schedule.
There, fixed it. This year was the first year you actually won it out right since 02-03? Yeah, an unbalanced schedule doesn't help. And it's not like your OOC was all that tough. You left home, what, twice? Against Florida (W) and against DePaul (L)?
For somebody who likes to fix posts, you get a lot of things wrong. I would go in depth, but it would take longer than I really care to spend. Look up ku's schedules. Look up the list of conference champions.
Hell, if anything the lack of a balanced schedule hurt ku last year. ku showed in Dallas that they were more than capable of beating UT away from Austin.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
You're scared to have to play the South teams on the road, aren't you?
Yeah, terrified. ku hasn't had any success against the South on the road since the formation of the league.
There fixed it. What's the best road win in the South in the past 5 years? A&M last year? They were this year's K-State team last year. OSU sucked last year. You've gotten drilled against UT and OSU the last few times and lost to OU as well.
The fact that you can pretty much point out every ku road loss to the South in one sentence pretty much makes my point for me. ku hasn't won 7 of 11 5 Big 12 titles out right by sucking on the road against the South. Also, ku doesn't seem to have much trouble winning the Big 12 tourney on a neutral site as they have the best all time record in that thing as well.
I don't want to play 22 conference games because you basically would have a non existent nonconference schedule.
There, fixed it. This year was the first year you actually won it out right since 02-03? Yeah, an unbalanced schedule doesn't help. And it's not like your OOC was all that tough. You left home, what, twice? Against Florida (W) and against DePaul (L)?
For somebody who likes to fix posts, you get a lot of things wrong. I would go in depth, but it would take longer than I really care to spend. Look up ku's schedules. Look up the list of conference champions.
Hell, if anything the lack of a balanced schedule hurt ku last year. ku showed in Dallas that they were more than capable of beating UT away from Austin.
Yes, I forgot about your devastating win @ S. Carolina.
-
No Tournament. 6 more conference games for full round-robin. No "unbalanced schedule." Eliminate 2-3 OOC games that our conference apparently sucks at scheduling anyways. Conference winner gets auto-bid.
That is 3 more weeks of conference play. Plus, you would lose 6 noncon games as the conference tournament games are considered exempt and the 6 extra conference games wouldn't be. There is no way that you will get a 22 game conference schedule. The Pac 10 coaches actually don't like it and they only play 20 games. Also, there is too much money to be made on the postseason tournament.
The Pac 10 only plays 18 games...not 20. But you are right. 16 is plenty, the conference power will shift back and forth all of the time. There is no need to add any more conference games and moving the tourney is a dumb idea imo. The gap b/t the 2 divisions is way overblown. If the North wins just 2 more games, then the season series is tied at 18. The thing that killed the North was CU and they are a few years away depending on who they hire. On the opposite end of the spectrum is ku as they were the best team in the conference and the Cats had to play them twice.
ku had by far the easiest conference schedule this year b/c they got OSU, UT, and A&M at home and they can't play against themselves. KSU would probably have another top 50 win or two if they had that schedule. The same could be said if they played in the South b/c they would have had more shots at the higher rpi'd teams.
Oh well, we are going to the NIT and need to make the best of it. B12 is fine the way it is and 65 is plenty (maybe one too many) for the NCAA. Like Huggs said...we just need to win more games.
-
start the season with big 12 play (still 16). play the conf. tourney (mid februaryish?). move the ooc to the end of the season.
-
start the season with big 12 play (still 16). play the conf. tourney (mid februaryish?). move the ooc to the end of the season.
Don't ever post again.
-
Don't ever post again.
you could have thought if it if you had applied yourself. i blame your time wasted on tigerboard.
-
Don't ever post again.
you could have thought if it if you had applied yourself. i blame your time wasted on tigerboard.
tigerinkansas is hilarious.
"here is what the tigers need to do to make the Nit..."
-
tigerinkansas is hilarious.
"here is what the tigers need to do to make the Nit..."
i get enough retard comments on ksu boards and baylorfans. for my extracurricular surfing i like the high iq stuff i get at places like ouinsider.
-
tigerinkansas is hilarious.
"here is what the tigers need to do to make the Nit..."
i get enough retard comments on ksu boards and baylorfans. for my extracurricular surfing i like the high iq stuff i get at places like ouinsider.
ada is a great guy.
cheno isn't smart.
I melted down at baylorfans.com recently after a techster bashed us.