KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: michigancat on March 12, 2007, 01:07:43 PM

Title: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: michigancat on March 12, 2007, 01:07:43 PM

Just thought this was interesting:

2001:  2-11; wins over Iowa, Mizzou
2002:  2-6; wins over Oklahoma St., Texas
2003:  2-10; wins over Texas Tech, Colorado
2004:  1-5; win over Texas
2005:  0-7; (this is when he should have been fired)
2006:  2-3; wins over Kansas an Texas A&M
2007:  2-5; wins over Texas and Texas Tech

Big XII NCAA teams by year:

2001: 6
2002: 6
2003: 6
2004: 4
2005: 6
2006: 4
2007: 4

League RPI rank:

2001: 6
2002: 3
2003: 2
2004: 4
2005: 3
2006: 5
2007: 7

Just an FYI

*added 2007*

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 12, 2007, 01:12:43 PM

Quote from: Rusty on March 12, 2007, 01:07:43 PM

Just thought this was interesting:

2001:  2-11; wins over Iowa, Mizzou
2002:  2-6; wins over Oklahoma St., Texas
2003:  2-10; wins over Texas Tech, Colorado
2004:  1-5; win over Texas
2005:  0-7; (this is when he should have been fired)
2006:  2-3; wins over Kansas an Texas A&M


Big XII NCAA teams by year:

2001: 6
2002: 6
2003: 6
2004: 4
2005: 6
2006: 4


League RPI rank:

2001: 6
2002: 3
2003: 2
2004: 4
2005: 3
2006: 5

Just an FYI

What were we this year?

Just goes to show how irrelevant that stat is.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on March 12, 2007, 01:16:56 PM

The more things change, the more they stay the same it seems...

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: catzacker on March 12, 2007, 01:20:33 PM

So basically, anytime OU, TT, or OSU have a bad year, expect 4 bids?

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: michigancat on March 12, 2007, 01:23:15 PM

I think if we get more than two top 50 home games, we win more than two overall.

Wooldridge had zero top 50 road wins.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: Dan Rydell on March 12, 2007, 01:25:35 PM

Quote from: Rusty on March 12, 2007, 01:23:15 PM

I think if we get more than two top 50 home games, we win more than two overall.

Wooldridge had zero top 50 road wins.

What about @ ku last year?

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: coitus on March 12, 2007, 01:26:17 PM

Quote from: Rusty on March 12, 2007, 01:23:15 PM

I think if we get more than two top 50 home games, we win more than two overall.

Wooldridge had zero top 50 road wins.

huggins had zero top 50 home wins.

maybe we need to never wear the black unis when playing a top 50 team.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: kougar24 on March 12, 2007, 01:27:01 PM

I guess we should have forced A&M and OSU to come to Manhattan this year, for the good of the conference.

Oh, and did USC fall out of the top 50?

Also, doesn't "The Committee" view road wins as much more favorable than home wins?

That stat is misleading due to the location of the games.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: ksu_FAN on March 12, 2007, 01:27:20 PM

Quote from: Rusty on March 12, 2007, 01:23:15 PM

I think if we get more than two top 50 home games, we win more than two overall.

Wooldridge had zero top 50 road wins.

And only 1 in the OOC, his first year.  

We should have at least 3 or 4 games next year vs potential Top 50 RPI teams in the OOC.  If we could split those it would be a great OOC slate.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 12, 2007, 01:28:12 PM

The stat is beyond retarded. Simply looking at it you'd think we haven't improved vs the last 6 years.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on March 12, 2007, 01:39:34 PM

We were apparently ever so slightly better this year.

There's no excuse for this team not making the tourney.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 12, 2007, 01:40:54 PM

I'm trying to get rusty to defend the stat fwiw.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: cireksu on March 12, 2007, 01:45:50 PM

Quote from: fatty fat fat on March 12, 2007, 01:28:12 PM

The stat is beyond retarded. Simply looking at it you'd think we haven't improved vs the last 6 years.

Maybe huggins is manginoing us.

Title: Re: Wooly vs. Top 50
Post by: michigancat on March 12, 2007, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: bslimz on March 12, 2007, 01:25:35 PM

Quote from: Rusty on March 12, 2007, 01:23:15 PM

I think if we get more than two top 50 home games, we win more than two overall.

Wooldridge had zero top 50 road wins.

What about @ ku last year?

:peek:

Quote from: fatty fat fat on March 12, 2007, 01:28:12 PM

The stat is beyond retarded. Simply looking at it you'd think we haven't improved vs the last 6 years.

It's very important to the committee.