KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on February 28, 2007, 09:28:40 PM

Title: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 28, 2007, 09:28:40 PM
than most give them credit.



Carter, Kava, Sloan, Jones are all better players or as good as martin/hoskins
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: pufizzle on February 28, 2007, 09:30:19 PM
I'll give you all those except Kava.  No way he's as good a player as Hoskins/Martin.  He's a very good role player that plays within himself.  But Hoskins/Martin can put a team on their back.  Kava can't.
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: michigancat on February 28, 2007, 09:31:22 PM
BCG must be a hell of a "developer" of talent.

None of those guys was top 100 (except Carter, who sucked last year)
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 28, 2007, 09:33:03 PM
aTm is an excellent shooting team.

People underestimate how bad we are at shooting.
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: pufizzle on February 28, 2007, 09:34:37 PM
I think we are one of the worst shooting teams that I have seen in the last few years.  Is that underestimating?  At times.........probably  :banghead:
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 28, 2007, 11:26:27 PM
Look no further then the ku game in Manhattan, how many wide open shots can one team miss??

Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: opcat on March 01, 2007, 02:17:03 AM
They took that big lithuanian right out of our backyard.  :mad: :mad: :mad:

WOOLRIDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   :twobirds:
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: sys on March 01, 2007, 09:36:11 AM
than most give them credit.



Carter, Kava, Sloan, Jones are all better players or as good as martin/hoskins

doesn´t this violate the logic of your mu argument?
Title: Re: A&M is a lot more talented
Post by: ksu_FAN on March 01, 2007, 09:50:19 AM
than most give them credit.



Carter, Kava, Sloan, Jones are all better players or as good as martin/hoskins

doesn´t this violate the logic of your mu argument?

 :popcorn: