KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: michigancat on January 31, 2007, 09:57:49 PM

Title: What's with Harris
Post by: michigancat on January 31, 2007, 09:57:49 PM
MU's supposed to be his good games.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: Stillwater Cat on January 31, 2007, 10:00:47 PM
He's gonna owe me a new laptop and speakers if he keeps this up....   :banghead:
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: michigancat on January 31, 2007, 10:01:45 PM
I can't believe he's only been credited with 4 turnovers.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: tmramrod91 on January 31, 2007, 10:20:32 PM
He was def doin his best to lose this game. I like how huggins pulled him aside and talked to him, but obvioulsy it did no good. Just a classic Harris off game. Its painfully obvious if we're going to beat really good teams we have to have all of the big 3 hittin on all cylinders.
Stewart was pretty bad tonight as well.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: waks on January 31, 2007, 10:21:31 PM
We actually only had 16 turnovers. I would have guessed 60.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: catzacker on January 31, 2007, 10:49:10 PM
At one point, I thought that Harris was going to single handedly lose the game for us. 

Also, I'm back on the "I hate Clent Stewart" bandwagon with Kat Kid.  Dear Christ, how many times did he just throw it directly to an MU player?

I'm really enjoying that KSU's style of play makes it insanely frustrating for other teams' fans when they lose.  It's quite fun to watch them search for answers. 
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 31, 2007, 10:52:52 PM
Harris really struggled tonight.  His shot was off and he was bad with the basketball in his hands.

Stewart's play was magnified by his 3 transition turnovers.  It almost seemed like Clent thought he had to match Hannah tonight in his plays made and that was a bad idea.  Seriously, Clent did a great job against MU's pressure, but the transition turnovers almost override that.

Cartier was a beast tonight and is becoming the player Huggins wants him to be.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: catzacker on January 31, 2007, 10:57:31 PM
Stewart's play was magnified by his 3 transition turnovers. 

I was hoping Colon would punch Stewart after those transition turnovers. 

It seems like in most games of this 6 game stretch (outside of Chicago St.) there is about 3 minutes (about 6 posessions - 3 on O and 3 on D) in the second half where we play like dog crap and instead of extending our lead, we dig ourselves into a hole that we have to spend the next 5-8 minutes getting out of. 
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: mjrod on January 31, 2007, 10:59:25 PM
Rumor has it that Lance Harris water bottle was drugged by Stephon Hannah.

We'll go with that one.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 31, 2007, 10:59:56 PM
Stewart's play was magnified by his 3 transition turnovers. 
It seems like in most games of this 6 game stretch (outside of Chicago St.) there is about 3 minutes (about 6 posessions - 3 on O and 3 on D) in the second half where we play like dog crap and instead of extending our lead, we dig ourselves into a hole that we have to spend the next 5-8 minutes getting out of. 

As much as I hate to do it, I will give MU some credit on that.  They really executed on their run and they are really a pretty good team.  Doesn't mean I have to like them.

Also, early when MU went zone we had some GREAT 15 footers that simply wouldn't go.  That's when they made their first run and it wasn't until late we took back control to seal it.
Title: Re: What's with Harris
Post by: catzacker on January 31, 2007, 11:01:31 PM
Stewart's play was magnified by his 3 transition turnovers. 
It seems like in most games of this 6 game stretch (outside of Chicago St.) there is about 3 minutes (about 6 posessions - 3 on O and 3 on D) in the second half where we play like dog crap and instead of extending our lead, we dig ourselves into a hole that we have to spend the next 5-8 minutes getting out of. 

As much as I hate to do it, I will give MU some credit on that.  They really executed on their run and they are really a pretty good team.  Doesn't mean I have to like them.

Also, early when MU went zone we had some GREAT 15 footers that simply wouldn't go.  That's when they made their first run and it wasn't until late we** took back control to seal it.

**the refs (per tigerboard)