KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: cas on January 27, 2007, 08:32:56 PM

Title: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: cas on January 27, 2007, 08:32:56 PM
nm
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: michigancat on January 27, 2007, 08:58:09 PM
I still say no.
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on January 27, 2007, 09:03:57 PM
25% chance until we beat one of the top 4 teams in the conference, at which point it would switch to 50%.  If we beat two of them, 75%.

It's still very likely that we drop one we shouldn't, with MU, ISU, CU, @CU, and @NU being in that category.  Four games from now we'll have a much clearer picture.

Mizzou does seem to be playing better than when we played them in Columbia.  How well do they play on the road?
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: rlatta on January 27, 2007, 10:48:25 PM
I still say no.

Good things happen when you are negative.  "OU wins on a short pass"  Rusty 2003
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on January 27, 2007, 10:54:16 PM
25% chance until we beat one of the top 4 teams in the conference, at which point it would switch to 50%.  If we beat two of them, 75%.

It's still very likely that we drop one we shouldn't, with MU, ISU, CU, @CU, and @NU being in that category.  Four games from now we'll have a much clearer picture.

Mizzou does seem to be playing better than when we played them in Columbia.  How well do they play on the road?

Watched most of their game at CU...CU just SUCKS...and there were like 1500 people there...

I couldn't believe how much trouble their press gave Tech today.

KSU should beat MU soundly on Wed....

Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: AzCat on January 27, 2007, 11:00:47 PM
Tech was putrid and handled the ball very poorly in the OU game just before they played us then did pretty much the same thing in Manhattan.  We just failed to capitalize on their mistakes.  Moo's press exposed Tech, anyone who wants to hammer Tech from here on out now knows that a bit of full court pressure will probably get the job done.
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: fatty fat fat on January 27, 2007, 11:24:42 PM
I still say no.

I agree, mostly because I see us as a 9-7 team with no quality wins. I'd be thrilled with 9-7 w/the crappy talent we have.
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: michigancat on January 28, 2007, 08:07:22 AM
I still say no.

I agree, mostly because I see us as a 9-7 team with no quality wins. I'd be thrilled with 9-7 w/the crappy talent we have.

Exactly.  9-7 would be f'ing incredible.
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: PowercatPosse on January 28, 2007, 11:01:48 AM
If we don't go 9-7, i am gonna be really disappointed.  No reason we should lose more than one game to this group of games ---- Mu, Isu, OU, at NU, CU twice. I think we should win all of those, but our offense might let us down in one of those games.

I still think our chances of going 10-6 (or slim chance at 11-5) are 60-65%
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: sys on January 29, 2007, 02:47:54 AM
9-7 is not an incredible record in the 06-07 big 12.  with ksu´s schedule, there are 6 wins that any half decent mid-major should be able to get (homes vs the nortards and bu, and at cu).  go 3-7 in the others and you get to 9-7.  bfd.
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: michigancat on January 29, 2007, 08:00:47 AM
9-7 is not an incredible record in the 06-07 big 12.  with ksu´s schedule, there are 6 wins that any half decent mid-major should be able to get (homes vs the nortards and bu, and at cu).  go 3-7 in the others and you get to 9-7.  bfd.

We haven't had a winning B12 record ever and haven't gone better than 6-10 since 1999.

It doesn't matter what condition the Big XII is currently in - 9-7 is significant progress.  Keep in mind we barely have the talent of a half decent mid-major right now.
Title: Re: KSU and the NCAA Tournament
Post by: catsfan20012002 on January 29, 2007, 09:10:01 AM
I'm putting our odds at 99.9%.  :hope: