KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: waks on January 20, 2007, 12:41:25 AM

Title: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: waks on January 20, 2007, 12:41:25 AM

nm

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: RonLongshaft on January 20, 2007, 12:48:52 AM

i'm guessing cause we might be after him?

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: ksuno1stunner on January 20, 2007, 04:24:41 AM

probably because they are tired of seeing him in the database every year.

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: ds43fan on January 20, 2007, 10:43:21 AM

where do you guys so much as find this guys profile?

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 20, 2007, 11:23:05 AM

the three stages of his profile:

http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=1&pr_key=16741

http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=1&pr_key=38234

http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=57221&Sport=1

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: ds43fan on January 20, 2007, 11:24:47 AM

so he'd be a jr? (sorry im slow on recruiting)

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 20, 2007, 11:26:00 AM

Yep, he would only have two years to play.

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: ds43fan on January 20, 2007, 11:28:11 AM

2 years is 2 years

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: The Manhatter on January 20, 2007, 11:45:59 AM

the star ranking means nothing.  He was first team all-american in 2005 at NEO as a freshman.  Oklahoma signed him twice.  Rivals is well known for lowering the rankings on some of these kids who are not going to qualify or serious academic risks.

Supposedly he didn't have a great season and nobody thought he would qualify...could be attitude or work ethic.  Who knows.  But the kid is supremely talented and a baller.

Don't bother with his ranking...worry more about whether he'll qualify or what kind of attitude, not the talent.

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: ksuno1stunner on January 20, 2007, 12:08:58 PM

I would really have a hard time getting motivated playing for my second juco in two years.  But that's just me.  5 stars.  Holy &@#%ing crap.  If we somehow pick up Arthur Brown, that's Brown, Walker, and Patterson.  WOW.

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: cireksu on January 20, 2007, 01:31:28 PM

There was a guy who watched NEO play quite a bit that said Roland was just as good.  Maybe patterson was missing some of the other role players on that D.

Title: Re: Why is Patterson only a three star now??
Post by: catinthehat on January 21, 2007, 08:56:20 AM

you can forget brown.  he is like venables adopted son