KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: chum1 on January 09, 2007, 10:38:19 AM

Title: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: chum1 on January 09, 2007, 10:38:19 AM
Bennett, Jason Take
Colon, Luis Take
Hoskins, David Take
Kent, Darren Leave
Stewart, Clent Take
Walker, Billy Take
Yearby, Deilvez Leave
Young, Blake Take

I'd only get rid of two of these guys.  I wouldn't want any seniors back if it were possible.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 09, 2007, 10:40:49 AM
I think Huggins likes Kent. 
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: pissclams on January 09, 2007, 10:51:34 AM
Where's Patz?  Patz Take
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: atybimf on January 09, 2007, 10:55:22 AM
Get rid of Kent and Yearby, use the schollies to get some ball players.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: catzacker on January 09, 2007, 11:04:43 AM
I think Huggins likes Kent. 

I have yet to figure out why.  He's like a skinnier, weaker, less athletic version of Shawn Rhodes, which I didn't think was possible. 
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 09, 2007, 11:11:21 AM
Its apparent he must work awefully hard b/c coaches can throw a guy like that in when their better players are struggling and not get hurt.  Granted, Kent doesn't do a ton to help, though I thought his defense and hustle last night were pretty good.  Whether that is enough for him to stay I don't know, but I think he fits well with Huggins in that role.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: CatsNShocks on January 09, 2007, 11:17:42 AM
Patz and Kent: just takin' up space.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 09, 2007, 11:19:42 AM
Patz isn't a scholarship player.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: coitus on January 09, 2007, 11:27:31 AM
kent has one purpose.  to piss off everyone else that he's getting thier minutes.

Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: jarrr on January 09, 2007, 12:12:22 PM
I was thinking Kent could shoot the ball. Hes just not strong or physical enought to play in the post. Im thinking Wool recruited him thinking he could be a Steve Novak type player diamond in the rough.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 09, 2007, 12:16:04 PM
He was.  Huggins has seemed to try to play him in the post more, but he's not strong enough.  I think Huggins appreciates the fact that he's a 6-10 guy that can actually catch, pivot, and pass on a consistent basis and move his feet a little bit on defense.  He's not much of a threat outside that right now, but he can at least give you that much on a consistent basis for a few minutes per game.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: slucat on January 09, 2007, 12:29:22 PM
Kent was open quite a bit, and was battleing more in the post than Colon.  They should try to get him some shots, I know he hasn't shot well this season, but in his super limited play last year was he 100%?
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: pissclams on January 09, 2007, 12:42:38 PM
Huggins realizes that Kent doesn't hurt our team when he's on the floor.  He generally plays decent defense, understands spacing on the offensive end, and generally doesn't pass the ball directly to the opposing team like everyone else on our roster.  With Kent, I think it's more of a "What he doesn't do" than a "What he does" equation.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: icatmember on January 09, 2007, 12:55:12 PM
I suppose you could classify letting the ball slip through his hands when he tries to get a rebound or recieve a pass, not hurting out team, since it seems like usually a k-state player picks up the ball after his screw up.
Title: Re: Next year: Take 'em or leave 'em
Post by: KSt8er on January 09, 2007, 03:20:57 PM
Young, Blake - leave