KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: Peekok on February 02, 2010, 02:21:15 PM

Title: Harper or Slammur
Post by: Peekok on February 02, 2010, 02:21:15 PM
Both are dual threat, Harper did good for a year at Oregon, but the thought of Harper as a WR option sounds nice. Not considering Coffman
 :steadymobbin':
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: Lamesauce on February 02, 2010, 05:57:13 PM
Where's the "Coffman" option?
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: pencat on February 02, 2010, 06:10:45 PM
Where's the "Coffman" option?

WHO?  :rofl:
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: Bullfn33 on February 02, 2010, 08:14:17 PM
I vote Slammur to start out. We need WR's and Harper brings a proven skill to that position. If Slammur can't hack it then make the switch.
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: Kansas Seminole on February 02, 2010, 08:32:54 PM
Both are dual threat, Harper did good for a year at Oregon, but the thought of Harper as a WR option sounds nice. Not considering Coffman
 :steadymobbin':




"Harper did good for a year at Oregon"

I was unaware that 4 completions in 9 attempts for a 44 Percentage with 2 interceptions and 1 td was "good" :ugh:
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: kcnut on February 03, 2010, 11:56:12 AM
Harper should be qb cause i think bill snyder can coach him up unlike that fag coach at oregon.
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: Winters on February 03, 2010, 03:31:14 PM
Harper isn't a complete dumbass like slamur.
Title: Re: Harper or Slammur
Post by: JTKSU on February 05, 2010, 01:32:04 PM
Harper isn't a complete dumbass like slamur.

Sam has had to learn different playbooks like every year since high school.  Will be interesting to see if he can use this previous season and the off-season to actually learn a playbook.