KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: Jeffrey_Martin on January 22, 2010, 01:52:13 PM

Title: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: Jeffrey_Martin on January 22, 2010, 01:52:13 PM: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the65/2010/01/eric_prisbells_field_of_65_1-2.html#more (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the65/2010/01/eric_prisbells_field_of_65_1-2.html#more)
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: Skycat on January 22, 2010, 01:53:14 PM: The last 2 seed? :curse:
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: sys on January 22, 2010, 01:57:09 PM: Quote
Fans wisely didn’t rush the court

would have been a 3 seed with a court rush?
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: kougar24 on January 22, 2010, 01:58:07 PM: Vermont rematch! :chainsaw:
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: mocat on January 22, 2010, 02:04:38 PM: st louis region :woot:
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: BostonPancake on January 22, 2010, 02:06:04 PM: Collision course KSU/ West Virginia match-up.
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: catzacker on January 22, 2010, 02:08:06 PM: Dear Jeff,
please contact Curtis Malone and see if any up and comers in the DC Assault pipeline are interested in Rice...and then if other topics or schools get brought up during the course of the conversation, so be it. Thanks.

your friend,
catzacker
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: michigancat on January 22, 2010, 02:15:20 PM: I'll take that bracket in a heartbeat.
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: Bookcat on January 22, 2010, 02:20:21 PM: Texas : No one is going undefeated in Big XII play.

ha

You're next Kansas. Next Saturday you turds.
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: jaloma58 on January 22, 2010, 02:24:49 PM: Quote from: michigancat on January 22, 2010, 02:15:20 PM
I'll take that bracket in a heartbeat.
^ my thoughts as well... bracket is weak city.
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: kougar24 on January 22, 2010, 02:29:58 PM: Quote from: michigancat on January 22, 2010, 02:15:20 PM
I'll take that bracket in a heartbeat.

Can you imagine the ESPNgasm (not to mention the CBSgasm) over a Martin v. Huggins matchup?
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: yosh on January 22, 2010, 02:36:47 PM: lotta Big 12 love. Don't see Ok. St getting in at this point though. Pleanty of chances left to make a statement, but at this point I think they are out.
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: Weird Roberts foam finger on January 22, 2010, 02:46:01 PM: Quote from: jaloma58 on January 22, 2010, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: michigancat on January 22, 2010, 02:15:20 PM
I'll take that bracket in a heartbeat.
^ my thoughts as well... bracket is weak city.

Evan Turner :ohno:
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: Olivia Neutron Bomb on January 22, 2010, 02:52:38 PM: Quote from: Bookcat on January 22, 2010, 02:20:21 PM
Texas : No one is going undefeated in Big XII play.

ha

You're next Kansas. Next Saturday you turds.

Ha ha!
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: michigancat on January 22, 2010, 02:53:42 PM: I'll be honest, I didn't really look at the bracket.
Title: Re: Washington Post's take on field of 65
Post by: jester66 on January 22, 2010, 03:02:57 PM: uk's bracket would be unreal...I'll take this in a heartbeat

2 Villanova Big East
3 Duke ACC*
4 Purdue Big Ten
5 New Mexico MWC
6 Vanderbilt SEC
7 Baylor Big 12
8 Connecticut
9 Dayton Atlantic 10
10 UAB C-USA*
11 Richmond Atlantic 10
12 Saint Mary's WCC
13 Wichita State MVC
14 Charleston Southern*
15 Coastal Carolina Big South*
16 Campbell Atlantic Sun*