KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: purplebybirth on December 27, 2009, 12:38:41 AM
-
in the little caesar's bowl.
:dunno:
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
-
First 10 seconds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd30JESdb9o&feature=related
-
I had Little Caesars last night. Coincidence?
-
iirc,They also had a woman play-by-player in the booth....not a fan.
-
IIRC she was fine as hell. :tongue:
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
-
I am gonna guess that was Pam Ward in the booth. She always does play-by-play with that Ray Bentley dude on espn for b10 games.
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
-
Back to the original premise of this thread,
:ttiwwop:
-
(http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/34106.jpg)
-
Like the uniform changes. I would really like them if they were orange like the throwback ones.
-
That's what I'm talkin' about! F-N-A!
-
Umm.....where does she keep her flag?
-
Umm.....where does she keep her flag?
:fatty:
-
Umm.....where does she keep her flag?
She may administer penalties to me anytime that she wants.... :excited:
Sam S.
-
if someone said to me "hey, stay home, I'll go out and work and then you can spend the money I make". there'd be, like, zero chance I would have a problem with that. I wouldn't say "hey, that's not fair, I want to work."
-
if someone said to me "hey, stay home, I'll go out and work and then you can spend the money I make". there'd be, like, zero chance I would have a problem with that. I wouldn't say "hey, that's not fair, I want to work."
Agreed.
Imagine being one of the broads in the 50's who actually appreciated what a sweet &@#%ing deal they had going, and then having to sit there and watch those long-pants wearing bitches &@#% it all up. I would have been &@#%ing furious.
-
if someone said to me "hey, stay home, I'll go out and work and then you can spend the money I make". there'd be, like, zero chance I would have a problem with that. I wouldn't say "hey, that's not fair, I want to work."
Just guessing here but I would think the line judge for the Little Ceasar's Bowl isn't really bringing home enough cake to allow her husband to sit at home.
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
Never been to school is "more informed"? Some of those morons thought the world was flat and some "god" created the entire earth in 7 days. I would agree there was probably less corruption but that's just because the country was very small.
they also owned slaves.
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
Never been to school is "more informed"? Some of those morons thought the world was flat and some "god" created the entire earth in 7 days. I would agree there was probably less corruption but that's just because the country was very small.
they also owned slaves.
Actually those morons held the same belief that most of the people had at that time. Jefferson and Franklin were inventors and scientists.
Slavery was the norm around the world at that time. 'AROUND THE WORLD'. Including Africans who owned and profited from slavery.
Just saying.
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
Never been to school is "more informed"? Some of those morons thought the world was flat and some "god" created the entire earth in 7 days. I would agree there was probably less corruption but that's just because the country was very small.
they also owned slaves.
For example, in 1774, Benjamin Franklin and Benjamin Rush founded America's first antislavery society; John Jay was president of a similar society in New York. When Constitution signer William Livingston heard of the New York society, he, as Governor of New Jersey, wrote them, offering:
“I would most ardently wish to become a member of it [the society in New York] and... I can safely promise them that neither my tongue, nor my pen, nor purse shall be wanting to promote the abolition of what to me appears so inconsistent with humanity and Christianity... May the great and the equal Father of the human race, who has expressly declared His abhorrence of oppression, and that He is no respecter of persons, succeed a design so laudably calculated to undo the heavy burdens, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke.”
Other prominent Founding Fathers who were members of societies for ending slavery included Richard Bassett, James Madison, James Monroe, Bushrod Washington, Charles Carroll, William Few, John Marshall, Richard Stockton, Zephaniah Swift, and many more.
More Here (http://www.christiananswers.net/q-wall/wal-g003.html)
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
Never been to school is "more informed"? Some of those morons thought the world was flat and some "god" created the entire earth in 7 days. I would agree there was probably less corruption but that's just because the country was very small.
they also owned slaves.
Actually, the original Hebrew that the early books of the Old Testament were drawn from stated essentially it was 7 periods of time (of no determinate length). Traditionally, in Western Christian culture that has been translated as 7 days. However, due to the ambiguity of the language when the early Hebrew written it could mean anything.
As an additional note that those 7 time periods would fit nice in the theoretical order of the Big Bang, the universe's and the earth's creation, on through evolution.
Finally, one must note that the original concepts of the Big Bang Theory from the initial event to the present were decidedly shorter than is considered accurate today. This created great consternation among Darwinians/evolutionists of the the time because it didn't jibe with their time line and they actually vociferously attacked the Big Bang Theory as a bunch of crap (them crazy Christians actually supported it more at the time).
Just felt the need to add some less than important information to a less than important discussion.
Sam S.
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
Never been to school is "more informed"? Some of those morons thought the world was flat and some "god" created the entire earth in 7 days. I would agree there was probably less corruption but that's just because the country was very small.
they also owned slaves.
As an additional note that those 7 time periods would fit nice in the theoretical order of the Big Bang, the universe's and the earth's creation, on through evolution.
How so?
-
Geez, next they're going to want to vote.
And they screw that up too.
pfffft, I'm with you bro, allowing citizens the vote is LOCO. :crazy:
Founders didn't want any nonland owner or women to vote.
We had a more informed electorate then and not as much corruption and votebuying.
The Founding Fathers were pretty smart.
Never been to school is "more informed"? Some of those morons thought the world was flat and some "god" created the entire earth in 7 days. I would agree there was probably less corruption but that's just because the country was very small.
they also owned slaves.
This created great consternation among Darwinians/evolutionists of the the time because it didn't jibe with their time line
There wasn't really a time line before the Big Bang Theory. The universe was assumed to be infinite in time without a moment of creation.
http://physics.about.com/od/astronomy/f/BigBang.htm
Birth of the Big Bang
In 1927, Roman Catholic priest and physicist Georges Lemaitre independently calculated the Friedman solution and again suggested that the universe must be expanding. This theory was supported by Hubble when, in 1929, he found that there was a correlation between the distance of the galaxies and the amount of redshift in that galaxy's light. The distant galaxies were moving away faster, which was exactly what was predicted by Lemaitre's solutions.
In 1931, Lemaitre went further with his predictions, extrapolating backwards in time find that the matter of the universe would reach an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. This means the universe must have begun in an incredibly small, dense point of matter - a "primeval atom."
Philosophical Sidenote: The fact that Lemaitre was a Roman Catholic priest concerned some, as he was putting forth a theory which presented a definite moment of "creation" to the universe. In the 20's & 30's, most physicists - like Einstein - were inclined to believe that the universe had indeed always existed. In essence, the Big Bang theory was seen as "too religious" by many people.
-
WORLD FORUM!!!!!!!!!!111
-
WORLD FORUM!!!!!!!!!!111
This disqualifies it from WF.
(http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/34106.jpg)
-
WTF?
-
Whole lotta nerds on this board for this thread to go from discussing a female official (who may or may not be hot) to &@#%ing religions and politics. To those that hijacked this thread: BOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!