KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 11:01:00 AM

Title: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 11:01:00 AM
Quote
Just got an e-mail that McPherson QB Joel Piper has been offered by K-State. Guess he's considering whether to play FB, baseball or both.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/missouri/football/recruiting/player-Joel-Piper-90867
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 11:03:01 AM
Quote
Dual-threat quarterback
Mcpherson, Kansas
Mcpherson
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: KITNfury on December 18, 2009, 11:03:47 AM
Quote
GPA:3.8

What really matters.  :love:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 18, 2009, 11:08:51 AM
 :facepalm:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: PurpleReign on December 18, 2009, 11:18:57 AM
Kid has a canon for an arm.  Not extremely mobile.  He will be a kid that should redshirt and 3-4 years down the road could do very well in a May/Miller/Kavanaugh type offense.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 11:24:58 AM
Kid has a canon for an arm.  Not extremely mobile.  He will be a kid that should redshirt and 3-4 years down the road could do very well in a May/Miller/Kavanaugh type offense.

Sounds like a Wes Welker type player
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: cireksu on December 18, 2009, 11:25:44 AM
sounds like he's garbage
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: stormnut on December 18, 2009, 11:31:17 AM
Quote
Just got an e-mail that McPherson QB Joel Piper has been offered by K-State. Guess he's considering whether to play FB, baseball or both.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/missouri/football/recruiting/player-Joel-Piper-90867

No Stars :runaway: :nono:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: PowercatPat on December 18, 2009, 11:44:20 AM
Why would we offer this kid over Blackman? Our QB situation for next year sucks. Our options are a guy who wasn't good enough to be a starter in JUCO, a guy who sucked at QB at Oregon so they moved him to WR, a guy who has thrown one pass in his college career and played WR last season, and a guy that started the first 4 games of last season, barely beating UMass, and losing to La-La. We are screwed guys.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Rick Daris on December 18, 2009, 11:46:01 AM
Why would we offer this kid over Blackman? Our QB situation for next year sucks. Our options are a guy who wasn't good enough to be a starter in JUCO, a guy who sucked at QB at Oregon so they moved him to WR, a guy who has thrown one pass in his college career and played WR last season, and a guy that started the first 4 games of last season, barely beating UMass, and losing to La-La. We are screwed guys.

that lala loss was gregory's fault.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Pett on December 18, 2009, 11:46:31 AM
No. Wait, seriously? :banghead:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Pett on December 18, 2009, 11:48:36 AM
Quote
GPA:3.8

What really matters.  :love:

Meh. Wish it was 40 time.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 11:50:53 AM
d00ds, thanks to my (well, Pete's technically) 5 star rating he is now up to 4.00 stars from 4 users    :ksu:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on December 18, 2009, 12:30:52 PM
Don't doubt the legend, asshat.   :curse:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: JTKSU on December 18, 2009, 12:39:59 PM
Why would we offer this kid over Blackman? Our QB situation for next year sucks. Our options are a guy who wasn't good enough to be a starter in JUCO, a guy who sucked at QB at Oregon so they moved him to WR, a guy who has thrown one pass in his college career and played WR last season, and a guy that started the first 4 games of last season, barely beating UMass, and losing to La-La. We are screwed guys.

I imagine this is a preferred walk-on offer.  I seriously doubt we're giving this kid one of last few remaining schollies. 
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: bam8485 on December 18, 2009, 12:42:04 PM
 Kass part 2.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: KSUTOMMY on December 18, 2009, 12:44:56 PM
THIS kid over Blackman? wow, just wow.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: vanro03 on December 18, 2009, 12:50:40 PM
We got a few QB's at Nebraska we'll give ya..  :banghead:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: catzacker on December 18, 2009, 01:11:40 PM
lmao at snyds garbage recruiting.  the ability to use a cell phone is really helping snyds out.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: cireksu on December 18, 2009, 01:15:51 PM
lmao at snyds garbage recruiting.  the ability to use a cell phone is really helping snyds out.

HE TEXTS!!!!!!111!!11!
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: vanro03 on December 18, 2009, 01:16:51 PM
lmao at snyds garbage recruiting.  the ability to use a cell phone is really helping snyds out.
Does he have one yet? :hahano:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: CatsNShocks on December 18, 2009, 01:56:51 PM
Why would we offer this kid over Blackman? Our QB situation for next year sucks. Our options are a guy who wasn't good enough to be a starter in JUCO, a guy who sucked at QB at Oregon so they moved him to WR, a guy who has thrown one pass in his college career and played WR last season, and a guy that started the first 4 games of last season, barely beating UMass, and losing to La-La. We are screwed guys.

I imagine this is a preferred walk-on offer.  I seriously doubt we're giving this kid one of last few remaining schollies. 

Got Tate?
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Pete on December 18, 2009, 01:58:53 PM
Sounds like a Justin Evans clone (wonderful human being, BTW).
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Pete on December 18, 2009, 02:01:06 PM
Wow.  That literally did make me laugh out loud.  I type "LOL" sometimes and really mean that I smiled and chuckled inside, but this was the real thing.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: MadCat on December 18, 2009, 02:18:09 PM
Wow.  That literally did make me laugh out loud.  I type "LOL" sometimes and really mean that I smiled and chuckled inside, but this was the real thing.

Honestly, how many LOLs are genuine these days?  This moment should be cherished.  :woot:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on December 18, 2009, 02:19:15 PM
This youngster will make a fine roommate for Tate.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 02:22:24 PM
4.43 stars from 7 users

 :steadymobbin':
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: pissclams on December 18, 2009, 02:28:44 PM
lmao at snyds garbage recruiting.  the ability to use a cell phone is really helping snyds out.
Does he have one yet? :hahano:

yup, and it's cellular too.
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NVIyqlcHzR4/SPSjNtsqeTI/AAAAAAAADDU/qOct7R1h8zA/s400/oldcellphones3_18_06_08.jpg)
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: 85catbacker on December 18, 2009, 02:36:23 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 18, 2009, 02:37:10 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 02:37:34 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.
:KSUFansAppv:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: 85catbacker on December 18, 2009, 02:50:35 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Nope. Sorry.  Has to be something that doesn't have to be f*#$ing censored.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2009, 02:52:01 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Nope. Sorry.  Has to be something that doesn't have to be f*#$ing censored.

little bitches :dunno:
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: catzacker on December 18, 2009, 02:53:21 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Nope. Sorry.  Has to be something that doesn't have to be f*#$ing censored.

Elite.  

And make sure you capitalize the "E".  I didn't go to Elite School for 4 years to have the "E" in lower case.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: 85catbacker on December 18, 2009, 03:55:41 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Nope. Sorry.  Has to be something that doesn't have to be f*#$ing censored.

Elite.  

And make sure you capitalize the "E".  I didn't go to Elite School for 4 years to have the "E" in lower case.
Elite?  I don't think the powertards would agree.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: JTKSU on December 18, 2009, 03:57:06 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Nope. Sorry.  Has to be something that doesn't have to be f*#$ing censored.

Elite.  

And make sure you capitalize the "E".  I didn't go to Elite School for 4 years to have the "E" in lower case.

Aren't you in high school?  Elite school doesn't start until you reach KState little buddy.
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Rick Daris on December 18, 2009, 03:58:08 PM
Okay.  We have powertards. What do we call you guys? Fantards? Negative nancys? Angrytards?  Somebody please come up with a name and emoticon.

litte b*tches.
Nope. Sorry.  Has to be something that doesn't have to be f*#$ing censored.

Elite.  

And make sure you capitalize the "E".  I didn't go to Elite School for 4 years to have the "E" in lower case.
Elite?  I don't think the powertards would agree.

and that's why they are powertards. what part of this aren't you getting?
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: FelixRex on December 18, 2009, 05:55:31 PM
Any word on whether he really wants to be here? Also, how does he do things? (please be "the right way" :crossesfingers  :pray:)
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: Stupid Fitz on December 19, 2009, 05:40:07 PM
Any word on whether he really wants to be here? Also, how does he do things? (please be "the right way" :crossesfingers  :pray:)

If OB recruited him, or someone from his crapty staff, he surely does "things the right way". 

FYI, that means he is terrible. 
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: KsuRules07 on December 20, 2009, 02:28:49 AM
Zimmerman"s your guy.  Trust me
Title: Re: QB = Solved
Post by: ksuchris2000 on December 20, 2009, 09:08:09 AM
"Someone google up Zimmerman on the internet machine!"

"Get me some coffee, Cosh!"