KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on December 05, 2009, 10:37:31 PM

Title: poor tcu
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 05, 2009, 10:37:31 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 05, 2009, 10:41:06 PM
I know right?? If anything should convince Gary to come here it should be this. I mean undefeated and can't get to the NC game. Currie should make a huge pitch.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: krazykat on December 05, 2009, 10:46:37 PM
feel horrible for tcu. i talked crap all night for tcu. gonna have to drink this one away. welcome to your SIR PARKER horny toads.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: hemmy on December 05, 2009, 10:51:11 PM
feel horrible for tcu. i talked crap all night for tcu. gonna have to drink this one away. welcome to your SIR PARKER horny toads.

Not even close to the same disappointment.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: chum1 on December 05, 2009, 10:52:25 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 05, 2009, 10:53:00 PM
feel horrible for tcu. i talked crap all night for tcu. gonna have to drink this one away. welcome to your SIR PARKER horny toads.

Not even close to the same disappointment.

I agree. they couldn't control this. They did what they had to by winning all their games.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 05, 2009, 10:54:14 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

the # of name schools goes down if you play in the big 12.

but agreed, for the most part.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 05, 2009, 10:55:18 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 05, 2009, 10:56:05 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.

and people would say the big 12 sucks if we finish above texas/ou.

look at 1998.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 05, 2009, 10:56:18 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.

If that would happen, i don't see how they couldn't go to a playoff after that sh*t
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Winters on December 05, 2009, 10:58:35 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.

and people would say the big 12 sucks if we finish above texas/ou.

look at 1998.
98 was ridiculously loaded, imHo
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 05, 2009, 11:02:14 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.

If that would happen, i don't see how they couldn't go to a playoff after that sh*t

Sadly, we will never see a playoff.  NCAA and Schools in general would lose too much money.  NCAA also frowns on the thought of extending the season to more games than already exists.  It takes away from the basketball support, and also it would be difficult to get money from multiple playoff games unless they are hosted at the team's stadium like the NFL.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 05, 2009, 11:04:09 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.

If that would happen, i don't see how they couldn't go to a playoff after that sh*t

Sadly, we will never see a playoff.  NCAA and Schools in general would lose too much money.  NCAA also frowns on the thought of extending the season to more games than already exists.  It takes away from the basketball support, and also it would be difficult to get money from multiple playoff games unless they are hosted at the team's stadium like the NFL.

Yeah, there would be a lot of hoops to go through. Fowler really pushing it hard on SC right now. Saying he would put tcu ahead of Texas. just shows how imperfect it is.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: krazykat on December 05, 2009, 11:09:57 PM
feel horrible for tcu. i talked crap all night for tcu. gonna have to drink this one away. welcome to your SIR PARKER horny toads.

Not even close to the same disappointment.

I agree. they couldn't control this. They did what they had to by winning all their games.

it still sucks hard to be tcu right now, i mean one god damn field goal/or no penalty from a shot at the NC. but in the end the "right" two teams are playing for all the marbles. still crapty for tcu with the current post season system.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: chum1 on December 05, 2009, 11:12:57 PM
Cincinnati probably would have jumped them anyway. 
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 05, 2009, 11:15:04 PM
Cincinnati probably would have jumped them anyway. 

not even talking about Cinci on SC fwiw
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: FormerKCCat on December 05, 2009, 11:16:31 PM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.

Um....no.  Undefeated Tejas wouldn't be "undefeated" because KSU would beat them in the B12C game.  You would have to count on a USC vs Florida matchup or something.  Not likely though FWIW.

I hope that our new AD is smart enough to have already started putting the pieces in place for Coach Patterson to succeed Coach Snyder.   :hope:  :pray:

A 13 - 0 Big XII Champ K-State plays for the MNC/BCS Championship; heck he HAS to go undefeated just to sniff a BCS bowl game.  Even an 11 win Big XII runner up K-State is likely into a BCS bowl from here on out.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Pett on December 05, 2009, 11:44:15 PM
Where are those loser horny toads that were on here last year? :rofl:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Catfanatic on December 06, 2009, 03:14:52 PM
IF ksu was 13-0 THIS year we would have beat texas and we would be in the mnc game versus bama because we would have been ranked above Cinn & tcu during the season and beat texas.

Now if a big 10 school or pac ten school like (osu or usc) were undefeated then I would agree with your argument but the big 12 will always get the nod over the big east or a non bcs school like tcu IMO.

Disclaimer: This is all hypothetic so it doesn't matter anyway.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: chum1 on December 06, 2009, 03:23:55 PM
Are all Pattertards powertards?  Hadn't noticed before, but this seems to be the case.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Catfanatic on December 06, 2009, 03:39:58 PM
Has a big 12 school ever gone undefeated and not been in the mnc game, regardless of who is the coach?
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: FormerKCCat on December 06, 2009, 07:01:54 PM
Are all Pattertards powertards?  Hadn't noticed before, but this seems to be the case.

I'll gladly wear the mantel of "Pattertard," but I'm not qualified to be a Powertard.  Personally, would LOVE to see Patterson back at his Alma Mater.   :hope:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Thin Blue Line on December 06, 2009, 07:03:18 PM
It really does suck, for a school that has one two NC's, not to even get a chance. BSU V. tcu in fiesta. crap.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Chingon on December 06, 2009, 07:03:49 PM
A giant FU to the nonBCS schools.

:lol:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: kougar24 on December 06, 2009, 09:19:19 PM
I feel so bad for you, GP. You deserved better.  :'(
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Bookcat on December 06, 2009, 10:15:35 PM
I feel so bad for you, GP. You deserved better.  :'(

I don't feel sorry one bit. GPatt knew his teams' fate if none of the big dogs lost before their title games. if he's smart enough to build an awesome defense like that..then he would know the best tcu could EVER DO is this crapty matchup in a "BCS" bowl.


GPatt, Enjoy Fort Worthless for the rest of your career. Don't ever take on a new challenge. Just maintain the status quo...that's the best way to enjoy life. Never take on a challenge.
 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: PCR on December 06, 2009, 11:05:04 PM
Sending tcu to play Boise is such a huge FU to everyone from the bowls.  I hope congress passes their resolution to destroy the BCS this week.  So sick of this system. 
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: kougar24 on December 07, 2009, 10:23:13 AM
Sending tcu to play Boise is such a huge FU to everyone from the bowls.  I hope congress passes their resolution to destroy the BCS this week.  So sick of this system. 

Congress should probably stay out of that over which they have no real authority. But of course they won't. See: steroids in baseball.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: MadCat on December 07, 2009, 10:28:51 AM
Sending tcu to play Boise is such a huge FU to everyone from the bowls.  I hope congress passes their resolution to destroy the BCS this week.  So sick of this system. 

Congress should probably stay out of that over which they have no real authority. But of course they won't. See: steroids in baseball.

I foresee legislation outlawing the BCS with a rider to pass some new health care bullcrap...maybe tack on some more taxes fees just for fun as well.  :pirate_grrr:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: ednksu on December 07, 2009, 10:33:25 AM
If Patterson at KSU had an undefeated team in the same season that two name schools were undefeated, he'd still be the odd man out.  So, if he really wants to avoid this situation, he needs to go to a name schoool.
terribly wrong statement.  Lets say this year or any other year.  We would have to take down 2 or 3 good south teams, one of which (UT/OU) would be a NC contender.  We would be in.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: ednksu on December 07, 2009, 10:37:57 AM
Sending tcu to play Boise is such a huge FU to everyone from the bowls.  I hope congress passes their resolution to destroy the BCS this week.  So sick of this system. 

Congress should probably stay out of that over which they have no real authority. But of course they won't. See: steroids in baseball.
congress has authority because of anti-trust legislation.  Public universities should not be allowed to participate in the BCS.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Rick Daris on December 07, 2009, 10:51:04 AM
Don't ever take on a new challenge. Just maintain the status quo...that's the best way to enjoy life. Never take on a challenge.

i often disagree w/ bookcat but he hit the nail on the head here. challenges are stupid, risky and probably hard. if given the choice of doing something really challenging in your career or cruising along w/ no worries. go w/ the no worries. more time to message board and eat food and do other stuff.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Fledermaus on December 07, 2009, 11:04:13 AM

tcu & Boise are sitting in the fabled catbird seat.  One of them will end up with an undefeated season and so they can go around claiming a national champsionship, just like so cal did (esp. if tejas wins).  Also Cincinatti has possibility of doing this.
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Thin Blue Line on December 07, 2009, 11:16:20 AM
Don't ever take on a new challenge. Just maintain the status quo...that's the best way to enjoy life. Never take on a challenge.

i often disagree w/ bookcat but he hit the nail on the head here. challenges are stupid, risky and probably hard. if given the choice of doing something really challenging in your career or cruising along w/ no worries. go w/ the no worries. more time to message board and eat food and do other stuff.

That kind of thinking results in relationships with women bigger than you.
 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: poor tcu
Post by: Chingon on December 07, 2009, 11:38:02 AM
Don't ever take on a new challenge. Just maintain the status quo...that's the best way to enjoy life. Never take on a challenge.

i often disagree w/ bookcat but he hit the nail on the head here. challenges are stupid, risky and probably hard. if given the choice of doing something really challenging in your career or cruising along w/ no worries. go w/ the no worries. more time to message board and eat food and do other stuff.

That kind of thinking results in relationships with women bigger than you.
 :thumbsup:
Don't think that'll be a problem with rd!

BOOOOOM!

sorry rd, but you are a big guy.