KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: ksu_FAN on December 01, 2009, 10:46:09 AM

Title: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: ksu_FAN on December 01, 2009, 10:46:09 AM
Big 12 Awards (http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=10410&ATCLID=204842329)

Quote
INDIVIDUAL AWARD WINNERS
Coach of the Year Mack Brown, Texas
Offensive Lineman of the Year Russell Okung, Oklahoma State
Defensive Lineman of the Year Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
Offensive Freshman of the Year Christine Michael, Texas A&M
Defensive Freshman of the Year Aldon Smith, Missouri
Special Teams Player of the Year Brandon Banks, Kansas State
Defensive Newcomer of the Year David Sims, Iowa State
Offensive Newcomer of the Year Daniel Thomas, Kansas State


And Mack Brown continues to be the class of the league.  Amazing that UT is the only BCS program in the country to not have a 5 loss (or worse) season the last 10 years. 
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: CaptainCrap on December 01, 2009, 10:49:40 AM
Which team in the Big 12 will have the most selections to the 1st Team All-Bg 12 Offense???

 :kstatriot:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: steve dave on December 01, 2009, 10:50:55 AM
Which team in the Big 12 will have the most selections to the 1st Team All-Bg 12 Offense???

 :kstatriot:


 :love:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: steve dave on December 01, 2009, 10:52:36 AM
And Mack Brown continues to be the class of the league.  Amazing that UT is the only BCS program in the country to not have a 5 loss (or worse) season the last 10 years. 

He's amazing.  I LOL in the faces of tards that stick to the "Mack can't coach" talking point.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 10:52:55 AM
(http://image.cdnl3.xosnetwork.com/pics10/400/LG/LGXLKIKHZQSCDOS.20080910155107.jpg)


 :lol:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on December 01, 2009, 10:55:57 AM
F Colt McCoy

 :curse:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 01, 2009, 10:56:22 AM
Mack really needs to get credit for:

1.  Lighting a fire under Greg Davis's a$$.

2.  Bringing in Will Muchchamp (or however you spell his last name).

There have been other guys with every advantage that Mack enjoys who have done squat . . . Mack has evolved, and taken full advantage of his situation at Texas and that just doesn't bode well for the rest of the Big 12 IMO . . . they're a got damn monster down there.

FFF . . . please explain your post.



Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 11:00:05 AM
THIS IS SO F*CKING FUN

 :drool:

Quote
INDIVIDUAL AWARD WINNERS
Coach of the Year    Mack Brown, Texas
Offensive Lineman of the Year    Russell Okung, Oklahoma State
Defensive Lineman of the Year    Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
Offensive Freshman of the Year    Christine Michael, Texas A&M
Defensive Freshman of the Year    Aldon Smith, Missouri
Special Teams Player of the Year    Brandon Banks, Kansas State
Defensive Newcomer of the Year    David Sims, Iowa State
Offensive Newcomer of the Year    Daniel Thomas, Kansas State
Defensive Player of the Year    Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
Offensive Player of the Year    Colt McCoy, Texas

dax, it's just a funny pic to use.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: chum1 on December 01, 2009, 11:00:37 AM
For me, Banks will always be a Prince guy and, consequently, an asswipe.  

DT, on the other hand, is yet another Bill Snyder first round special.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on December 01, 2009, 11:03:06 AM
DT, Mastrud, and Stringer 1st team All-Conference!  Wowzers.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 11:04:37 AM
DT, Mastrud, and Stringer 1st team All-Conference!  Wowzers.

WOW!! Weird stuff, but congrats to j-massy.

I've never had so much fun refreshing this big 12 sports site.

What an absolute joy this has been! Wow!
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on December 01, 2009, 11:05:46 AM
I have always loved Mastrud, but I didn't see that coming.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 11:07:38 AM
Quote
- Oklahoma has won the most major awards in the 14-year history of the Big 12 with 23. Texas is next with 22 winners, followed by Kansas State (16); Nebraska (11), Iowa State and Texas Tech (7); Colorado, Kansas, and Missouri (6); Oklahoma State and Texas A&M (5) and Baylor (2).

Nice lil EPMU (Emaw pick me up)

 8-)
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: CaptainCrap on December 01, 2009, 11:09:52 AM
Which team in the Big 12 will have the most selections to the 1st Team All-Bg 12 Offense???

 :kstatriot:


Totals for 1st Team Offense:

K-State: 4 (BTW, this is a team that did not score a TD the last 9 qtrs of the year  :eek:)
Okie State: 3
Texas: 2
Missouri: 2
Texas Tech: 1
Oklahoma:1
CU: 1
uk: 1
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 11:11:55 AM
What a second...crap...how did you know...before these were posted?

 :eek: :eek: :eek:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: CaptainCrap on December 01, 2009, 11:13:26 AM
What a second...crap...how did you know...before these were posted?

 :eek: :eek: :eek:

All about who you know.

(http://www.sector930.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/nbc_the_more_you_know1.jpg)
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: ksu_FAN on December 01, 2009, 11:13:39 AM
Props again to the defensive staff.  Had no 1st or 2nd team players but still managed to field a Top 40 yardage/Top 50 points defense.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 01, 2009, 11:31:00 AM
(http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o432/Thug2Wasteland/andy_samberg_jimp.gif)
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: Pett on December 01, 2009, 11:40:56 AM
That much talent on offense and the last three games of the season only an average of a little under ten points per game? :frown:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2009, 12:04:18 PM
Snyder had no talent.  :jerkoff:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 01, 2009, 12:11:57 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: ew2x4 on December 01, 2009, 12:14:47 PM
How long until 0506 repost?
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2009, 12:24:52 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.


what?  You don't call throwing to your 1st team TE 5 times over the last 5 games adapting an offense?

But seriously, this team had talent on first string on both sides of the ball.  The depth was absolutely awful, but we were ridiculously lucky with injuries.  All-in-all, 6-6 isn't impressive.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 12:50:42 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.


what?  You don't call throwing to your 1st team TE 5 times over the last 5 games adapting an offense?

But seriously, this team had talent on first string on both sides of the ball.  The depth was absolutely awful, but we were ridiculously lucky with injuries.  All-in-all, 6-6 isn't impressive.

what's your f*cking point? Snyder will bring in talent, and he did it this year.

:confused:

6-6 isn't impressive, but 4-4 is. And playing for the division title w/one game left is.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2009, 01:26:28 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.


what?  You don't call throwing to your 1st team TE 5 times over the last 5 games adapting an offense?

But seriously, this team had talent on first string on both sides of the ball.  The depth was absolutely awful, but we were ridiculously lucky with injuries.  All-in-all, 6-6 isn't impressive.

what's your f*cking point? Snyder will bring in talent, and he did it this year.

:confused:

6-6 isn't impressive, but 4-4 is. And playing for the division title w/one game left is.

Not w/ 4 1st teamers.

And Snyder bringing in talent.  :lol:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: WillieWannabe on December 01, 2009, 01:28:28 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.


what?  You don't call throwing to your 1st team TE 5 times over the last 5 games adapting an offense?

But seriously, this team had talent on first string on both sides of the ball.  The depth was absolutely awful, but we were ridiculously lucky with injuries.  All-in-all, 6-6 isn't impressive.

Just because Mastrud made All-Conference doesn't automatically make him good  :confused: :confused:
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: ednksu on December 01, 2009, 03:14:51 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.


what?  You don't call throwing to your 1st team TE 5 times over the last 5 games adapting an offense?

But seriously, this team had talent on first string on both sides of the ball.  The depth was absolutely awful, but we were ridiculously lucky with injuries.  All-in-all, 6-6 isn't impressive.

what's your f*cking point? Snyder will bring in talent, and he did it this year.

:confused:

6-6 isn't impressive, but 4-4 is. And playing for the division title w/one game left is.

Not w/ 4 1st teamers.

And Snyder bringing in talent.  :lol:

you're an idiot.

1) Snyder made them 1st teamers
2) Many people, including you had this team no where near a division title, pay respect where due.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: PowercatPat on December 01, 2009, 03:20:45 PM
Surprised Fitzgerald didn't get 2nd team.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2009, 03:48:20 PM
1) Snyder made them 1st teamers

lol's, last year, Banks was the offensive newcomer of the year, Stringer was HM, Mastrud had better stats than this year (but was behind ridiculous TE's), and DT showed up in August (he's a self made man).

And "having a chance to win the north" is possibly the most stupid accomplishment our idiotic fanbase has ever devised.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: mcmwcat on December 01, 2009, 03:53:19 PM
4 1st teamers and zero TDs in the last 2 games.  wow.  Prince left this offense stacked. if Freeman & offensive genius Prince stick around think how easy the stroll to a division championship would have been. :crybaby:

Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: Bhyaaaaa! on December 01, 2009, 04:34:45 PM
He had no talent at the one key position that all offenses, but particularly Snyder's offense needs talent in . . . which only makes the need to recruiting a good JC QB that much more glaring.   If OB's offense doesn't have a QB that can make plays . . . it simply don't matter what else is out there because OB wants the QB to  ALWAYS be the catlyst . . . thus the fallacy and trap (that I have fallen into myself) that OB can adapt his offense around anything he's got to work with.


what?  You don't call throwing to your 1st team TE 5 times over the last 5 games adapting an offense?

But seriously, this team had talent on first string on both sides of the ball.  The depth was absolutely awful, but we were ridiculously lucky with injuries.  All-in-all, 6-6 isn't impressive.

During the season we were. However to start the year we had already lost Unruh, Murphy, KTerrell and then Harold. All starters - - and key, proven players with exception to Kadero who had played himself into a starting spot in just a month or so.


Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: Bookcat on December 01, 2009, 04:46:15 PM
For me, Banks will always be a Prince guy and, consequently, an asswipe.  

DT, on the other hand, is yet another Bill Snyder first round special.

no. DT, as michigancat reminds us, is a Ron PRince recruit. Bill Snyder is in no way responsible for anything DT has given us. Ya hear that!!!?
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 04:54:15 PM

And "having a chance to win the north" is possibly the most stupid accomplishment our idiotic fanbase has ever devised.

no. it's not. it was exciting as f*ck which is why we are fans. dork.

and btw, is your argument snyder wasted talent, or that he can't bring in talent, or to just fit your loser argument whenever's?
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2009, 05:09:21 PM

And "having a chance to win the north" is possibly the most stupid accomplishment our idiotic fanbase has ever devised.

no. it's not. it was exciting as f*ck which is why we are fans. dork.

and btw, is your argument snyder wasted talent, or that he can't bring in talent, or to just fit your loser argument whenever's?

My argument is he didn't do jack sh*t that was special, and the 4 first-teamers just support the argument.
Title: Re: Congrats Banks and DT!
Post by: fatty fat fat on December 01, 2009, 05:11:14 PM

And "having a chance to win the north" is possibly the most stupid accomplishment our idiotic fanbase has ever devised.

no. it's not. it was exciting as f*ck which is why we are fans. dork.

and btw, is your argument snyder wasted talent, or that he can't bring in talent, or to just fit your loser argument whenever's?

My argument is he didn't do jack sh*t that was special

yeah, and you're not getting an argument from anyone. wtf is special btw? 9-7 in phillips 66? :confused:

you're just being a little b*tch.

and sorry for calling you a dork. I don't think you are one.