KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: D-Rock on November 22, 2009, 07:47:04 PM

Title: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: D-Rock on November 22, 2009, 07:47:04 PM

So, while watching 'Nova and Ole Miss I see that 'Nova got called for offensive basket interference just like KSU did in their game.  Why is this rule in place?  Because it denies the defense an opportunity to rebound a shot that may have missed? :confused:

Anybody else think it's a stupid rule?

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: jmlynch1 on November 22, 2009, 07:48:31 PM

Teams would never miss if it wasn't a rule.

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: D-Rock on November 22, 2009, 07:51:28 PM

Quote from: jmlynch1 on November 22, 2009, 07:48:31 PM

Teams would never miss if it wasn't a rule.

Really?  That's it?  Maybe the defense should block out then?

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: rundown87 on November 22, 2009, 08:15:04 PM

Since the defense can't touch it, neither can the offense.  Wouldn't be fair if it's sitting on the rim and the offense could just slam it in and the defense couldn't do anything with it.

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: PowercatPat on November 22, 2009, 08:25:33 PM

Did anybody else think that was a bad call on Judge?

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: doom on November 22, 2009, 08:27:53 PM

Quote from: PowercatPat on November 22, 2009, 08:25:33 PM

Did anybody else think that was a bad call on Judge?

The over the back was bad.  The dunk was not. 

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: chum1 on November 22, 2009, 08:30:41 PM

Quote from: PowercatPat on November 22, 2009, 08:25:33 PM

Did anybody else think that was a bad call on Judge?

Yes.  Looked legal on the replay.

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 08:45:01 PM

I thought the ball was out of the cylinder.

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: doom on November 22, 2009, 08:50:20 PM

IIRC he was called for over the back as well?  wouldn't the shot have been waved? 

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 09:59:04 PM

Quote from: doom on November 22, 2009, 08:50:20 PM

IIRC he was called for over the back as well?  wouldn't the shot have been waved? 

I don't know if it was made clear.  I thought so for a moment, then it just sounded like they called the goaltend.

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: 1albatross on November 22, 2009, 10:06:57 PM

I think they just called goaltending.  I thought it was the right call live, but it looked like a good play on the replay.

In international basketball...some goaltending is allowed after the ball either hits the rim or the backboard.  Not exactly positive on when you can touch the ball though. 

Title: Re: Question for HBBIQ types?
Post by: doom on November 22, 2009, 10:22:00 PM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 09:59:04 PM

Quote from: doom on November 22, 2009, 08:50:20 PM

IIRC he was called for over the back as well?  wouldn't the shot have been waved?  

I don't know if it was made clear.  I thought so for a moment, then it just sounded like they called the goaltend.

Maybe it was a nice way to get the same effect w/o calling the foul?  Because it appeared to be bouncing out and up.