KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 06:00:39 PM

Title: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 06:00:39 PM
Love it when he plays like this.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: CerpinTaxt on November 22, 2009, 06:11:11 PM
beautiful dish to JamSam for the and1 :skillz:
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 06:21:24 PM
Dayton has gone on their run since he has been out with fouls.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 22, 2009, 06:27:52 PM
clemente playing great today.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Leyton on November 22, 2009, 07:13:46 PM
Very nice game for Dom.  :clap:
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: michigancat on November 22, 2009, 07:14:42 PM
thought judge was fantastic, also.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: sys on November 22, 2009, 07:17:43 PM
thought judge was fantastic, also.

not at blocking out.


sutton.   :love:
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 07:19:18 PM
thought judge was fantastic, also.

not at blocking out.


sutton.   :love:

Meh.  He missed some, got some.  He's a frosh.  His tip-in was HUGE.

Samuels was the one that ticked me off the last 5 minutes.  Back to back TOs, technical foul, miss 2 FTs, fail to block out and allow an offensive rebound...  did I miss anything.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: michigancat on November 22, 2009, 07:21:38 PM
thought judge was fantastic, also.

not at blocking out.


defense was pretty good (at least improved), effort was very good.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: doom on November 22, 2009, 07:22:05 PM
thought judge was fantastic, also.

not at blocking out.


sutton.   :love:

Meh.  He missed some, got some.  He's a frosh.  His tip-in was HUGE.

Samuels was the one that ticked me off the last 5 minutes.  Back to back TOs, technical foul, miss 2 FTs, fail to block out and allow an offensive rebound...  did I miss anything.

that tech was moronic.  shocked he was not ejected.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: sys on November 22, 2009, 07:26:33 PM
meh, i love them all ('cept maybe irving).
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Leyton on November 22, 2009, 07:29:15 PM
Wally had a big impact for having such a whimper of a stat line.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Skydog on November 22, 2009, 07:30:49 PM
What was the T?

Wasn't watching due to family crap :(
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Lamesauce on November 22, 2009, 07:35:23 PM
What was the T?

Wasn't watching due to family crap :(

Jamar gets ball taken from him, Dayton player and KSU player are down on the ground wrestling for the loose ball. JamSam is standing there and kicks the Dayton player in the head.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 07:35:40 PM
What was the T?

Wasn't watching due to family crap :(

Eh, no big deal.  After his 2nd turnover in a row, he just decided to kick the Dayton player who had just tied him up in the head (lightly).
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: D-Rock on November 22, 2009, 07:35:52 PM
meh, i love them all ('cept maybe irving).

C'mon, man.  IMHO, Irving looked better in his brief stint today than he has in any of the other times I've seen him play.  At least give him props for the shot he made while drawing a foul.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: doom on November 22, 2009, 07:38:16 PM
What was the T?

Wasn't watching due to family crap :(

Priorities.   :curse:
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Skydog on November 22, 2009, 07:44:55 PM
What was the T?

Wasn't watching due to family crap :(

Priorities.   :curse:

G-ma is moving into a nursing home, asshole  :curse:

Similar to Luis punch in the back of the head, my guess was it was more of a "hey man you ok" foot tap.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: jmlynch1 on November 22, 2009, 07:46:56 PM
What was the T?

Wasn't watching due to family crap :(

Priorities.   :curse:

G-ma is moving into a nursing home, asshole  :curse:

Similar to Luis punch in the back of the head, my guess was it was more of a "hey man you ok" foot tap.
Was not as blatant as the colon blow
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on November 22, 2009, 07:48:04 PM
kinda wish jamsam kicked him harder.  we need a solid thug reputation like the old school pistons.   :love:
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: RonLongshaft on November 22, 2009, 07:49:27 PM
thought judge was fantastic, also.

not at blocking out.


sutton.   :love:

Meh.  He missed some, got some.  He's a frosh.  His tip-in was HUGE.

Samuels was the one that ticked me off the last 5 minutes.  Back to back TOs, technical foul, miss 2 FTs, fail to block out and allow an offensive rebound...  did I miss anything.

that tech was moronic.  shocked he was not ejected.

im guessing if it would have been caught live it would have resulted in an ejection
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 07:54:32 PM
Back to Sutton.  I hope the last 2 games dispells the LBBIQ comments about Frank needing to sit Sutton, put McGruder in for Sutton, "he's not that great of a defender", etc.  He simply does a lot for this team when he plays like he did the last 2 games, especially tonight, and he needs to get his 20+ minutes per game for us to be successful this year.  Granted, he has ugly spots where he takes dumb shots, but his defense, grabbing offense boards/putbacks, and even the occasional drive and dish are big for this team.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: PoetWarrior on November 22, 2009, 08:14:20 PM
Sutton is in-cred-ible.


At everything.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Stupid Fitz on November 22, 2009, 08:43:14 PM
Friday not so good Dom. Tonight very good. Hopefully we see more if tonights Dom.

Great win
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: catzacker on November 22, 2009, 08:59:17 PM
Back to Sutton.  I hope the last 2 games dispells the LBBIQ comments about Frank needing to sit Sutton, put McGruder in for Sutton, "he's not that great of a defender", etc.  He simply does a lot for this team when he plays like he did the last 2 games, especially tonight, and he needs to get his 20+ minutes per game for us to be successful this year.  Granted, he has ugly spots where he takes dumb shots, but his defense, grabbing offense boards/putbacks, and even the occasional drive and dish are big for this team.


when sutton realizes who he is, he's good for the team.  the problem, is that other teams realize who he is and usually adjust accordingly, which usually brings out "bad dom".
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: Kat Kid on November 22, 2009, 09:04:06 PM
Back to Sutton.  I hope the last 2 games dispells the LBBIQ comments about Frank needing to sit Sutton, put McGruder in for Sutton, "he's not that great of a defender", etc.  He simply does a lot for this team when he plays like he did the last 2 games, especially tonight, and he needs to get his 20+ minutes per game for us to be successful this year.  Granted, he has ugly spots where he takes dumb shots, but his defense, grabbing offense boards/putbacks, and even the occasional drive and dish are big for this team.

ouch.

It is fair though.  I'm glad to see Dom playing well/out of Frank's dog house.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 09:58:06 PM
when sutton realizes who he is, he's good for the team.  the problem, is that other teams realize who he is and usually adjust accordingly, which usually brings out "bad dom".

Agree with your first point.  Its all about Sutton realizing who he is and how to play within that.  So far I don't really see how any team has adjusted to Sutton, its just about how he decides to play.  And when he does that, there really is not adjustment an opposing team can make.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: sys on November 22, 2009, 10:15:56 PM
So far I don't really see how any team has adjusted to Sutton, its just about how he decides to play.

dayton dared him to shoot a couple times.
Title: Re: Sutton.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2009, 10:17:05 PM
So far I don't really see how any team has adjusted to Sutton, its just about how he decides to play.

dayton dared him to shoot a couple times.

Yeah, but this is about all you can do.  Its not like you can stop him from playing great defense or hitting the boards with an adjustment.