KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: cheapseats on November 16, 2009, 10:02:09 PM

Title: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: cheapseats on November 16, 2009, 10:02:09 PM
Look at the Big 12 games that they have won:

Missouri, Nebraska was out played most of the game and it toke a couple of interceptions in the final period for them to luck this one out.

Baylor, block punt was Nebraska's only touchdown.  And they were playing against a freshman quarterback in his fist game.

Oklahoma; Pass interception lead to the Nub's only touchdown.  If Oklahoma didn't have so many turnovers, the game wouldn't have been close.

Kansas;  Meier fumbles on Nebraska's 3 yard line, this would have been the winning touchdown.  Kansas probably have the worst defense in the Big 12 and still made a close game out of it.

I'm not saying that Nebraska win not win, just that Kansas State will have to give them the victory.

Lastly, Bo Peep is not that good of a coach (maybe some day).
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: chum1 on November 16, 2009, 10:04:55 PM
Yeah, but if they hadn't turned the ball over eight times against ISU, they would have won easily.  Talk about a fluke loss.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Bookcat on November 16, 2009, 10:08:34 PM
thanks for the post cheapseats. post more this week. NU really does suck and pretends they are the crap.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: cheapseats on November 16, 2009, 10:12:03 PM
Yeah, but if they hadn't turned the ball over eight times against ISU, they would have won easily.  Talk about a fluke loss.

This is kind of my point.  I live in Nebraska and if you talk to those Cornholers, they say they would be 9 - 1 if it wasn't for 8 turnovers against Iowa State and a last second touchdown by Virginia Tech.  Selective memory.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: catdude33 on November 16, 2009, 10:14:08 PM
Look at the Big 12 games that they have won:

Missouri, Nebraska was out played most of the game and it toke a couple of interceptions in the final period for them to luck this one out.

Baylor, block punt was Nebraska's only touchdown.  And they were playing against a freshman quarterback in his fist game.

Oklahoma; Pass interception lead to the Nub's only touchdown.  If Oklahoma didn't have so many turnovers, the game wouldn't have been close.

Kansas;  Meier fumbles on Nebraska's 3 yard line, this would have been the winning touchdown.  Kansas probably have the worst defense in the Big 12 and still made a close game out of it.

I'm not saying that Nebraska win not win, just that Kansas State will have to give them the victory.

Lastly, Bo Peep is not that good of a coach (maybe some day).

Agreed on the part about Nebraska being sucky.  Also agree that the only way we lose this game is if we give it away, shoot ourselves in the foot, beat ourselves, etc.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Bookcat on November 16, 2009, 10:14:32 PM
Yeah, but if they hadn't turned the ball over eight times against ISU, they would have won easily.  Talk about a fluke loss.

This is kind of my point.  I live in Nebraska and if you talk to those Cornholers, they say they would be 9 - 1 if it wasn't for 8 turnovers against Iowa State and a last second touchdown by Virginia Tech.  Selective memory.

yeah, well everyone can play that game.

What if Josh Cherry shows up against Lafayette. We're sitting at 7 wins and saying "well, we might not win the North but we're going bowling at least"...

so......homerism has always been a part of the game.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: thehusker1 on November 17, 2009, 07:04:27 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Kat Kid on November 17, 2009, 07:46:46 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.

I bet you talk with a ridiculous hick accent.  Must be embarassing. :-[
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Bookie Pimp on November 17, 2009, 07:56:16 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o144/League_of_Cantankerous_Misanthropes/InternetToughGuy.jpg)
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: KC_Husker on November 17, 2009, 08:25:29 AM
Look at the Big 12 games that they have won:

Missouri, Nebraska was out played most of the game and it toke a couple of interceptions in the final period for them to luck this one out.Without the 2 scores on the interceptions, the result is the same 14-12 Nebraska. The Cornhuskers had 2 drives in the 4th qtr of over 65 yards.

Baylor, block punt was Nebraska's only touchdown.  And they were playing against a freshman quarterback in his fist game.Wrong. oh, and NU was playing a Frosh as well.

Oklahoma; Pass interception lead to the Nub's only touchdown.  If Oklahoma didn't have so many turnovers, the game wouldn't have been close.What lead to Oklahomas touchdown? Oh, right. They didnt have one. First time thats EVER happened to a Stoops coached OU team.

Kansas;  Meier fumbles on Nebraska's 3 yard line, this would have been the winning touchdown.  Kansas probably have the worst defense in the Big 12 and still made a close game out of it.ISU has a worse defense yet beat us. I dont understand the point. Its not like KSU has been a stalwart defensive power. They actually only give up one fewer point per game.

I'm not saying that Nebraska win not win, just that Kansas State will have to give them the victory.It would be nice to have it handed to us.

Lastly, Bo Peep is not that good of a coach (maybe some day).Agreed
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: KSUTOMMY on November 17, 2009, 09:04:44 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.

 :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

Tough talk from someone who probably didn't even graduate from nubb; do me a favor and go make out with your sister/cousin/mom some more.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 10:32:16 AM
Look, we might not be that good but we do have beat our common opponent by over 100 pts. more than you.  We beat three teams that beat you.  Sure, occasionally Daniel Russo pulls some b.s. crane kick and beats a clearly superior Johnny Lawerence, but this weekend the match is in the Cobra Kai Dojo and Johnny(the Huskers) is going to put Daniel (KSU) in a body bag. Don't post any sh*t about Snyder being Mr. Miyagi, or anything saying that somehow Daniel Russo was a badass, because everyone really knows that he was a no talent pu$$y. :nono:
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Wildcat Jack on November 17, 2009, 10:52:58 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.

I suggest you get in line at that dirty interstate overpass just west of the stadium...he said he'll be there.  Dave, this one may be a steer...so you might want to save the kicks to the junk.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Legore on November 17, 2009, 10:54:40 AM
Look, we might not be that good but we do have beat our common opponent by over 100 pts. more than you.  We beat three teams that beat you.  Sure, occasionally Daniel Russo pulls some b.s. crane kick and beats a clearly superior Johnny Lawerence, but this weekend the match is in the Cobra Kai Dojo and Johnny(the Huskers) is going to put Daniel (KSU) in a body bag. Don't post any sh*t about Snyder being Mr. Miyagi, or anything saying that somehow Daniel Russo was a badass, because everyone really knows that he was a no talent pu$$y. :nono:

You're going to include La La in this analysis?  Clearly we're a different team then when we played them.  Even an NU fan I think would have to admit if we played them again it wouldn't be anything close to the same game.    If they were really better then we are then we wouldn't be sitting here 4-3 in the big 12 right now. 

So in conference play we've beat one team that you lost too and you've beat two teams we lost too.   But we played OU in Norman and nobody in the history of the big 12 North has ever beat a Bob Stoops OU team in Norman.  It's rare for a team to even play them close down there don't think NU ever has.  So really as is usually the case with head to head comparisons your comparison bs is pretty much worthless.   
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 17, 2009, 11:03:48 AM
Look, we might not be that good but we do have beat our common opponent by over 100 pts. more than you.  We beat three teams that beat you.  Sure, occasionally Daniel Russo pulls some b.s. crane kick and beats a clearly superior Johnny Lawerence, but this weekend the match is in the Cobra Kai Dojo and Johnny(the Huskers) is going to put Daniel (KSU) in a body bag. Don't post any sh*t about Snyder being Mr. Miyagi, or anything saying that somehow Daniel Russo was a badass, because everyone really knows that he was a no talent pu$$y. :nono:

All right, that was actually really awesome.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: ksuFB on November 17, 2009, 11:11:37 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.

I suggest you get in line at that dirty interstate overpass just west of the stadium...he said he'll be there.  Dave, this one may be a steer...so you might want to save the kicks to the junk.

 :beerchug: :lol: :rofl:
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 11:11:54 AM
Look, we might not be that good but we do have beat our common opponent by over 100 pts. more than you.  We beat three teams that beat you.  Sure, occasionally Daniel Russo pulls some b.s. crane kick and beats a clearly superior Johnny Lawerence, but this weekend the match is in the Cobra Kai Dojo and Johnny(the Huskers) is going to put Daniel (KSU) in a body bag. Don't post any sh*t about Snyder being Mr. Miyagi, or anything saying that somehow Daniel Russo was a badass, because everyone really knows that he was a no talent pu$$y. :nono:

You're going to include La La in this analysis?  Clearly we're a different team then when we played them.  Even an NU fan I think would have to admit if we played them again it wouldn't be anything close to the same game.    If they were really better then we are then we wouldn't be sitting here 4-3 in the big 12 right now. 

So in conference play we've beat one team that you lost too and you've beat two teams we lost too.   But we played OU in Norman and nobody in the history of the big 12 North has ever beat a Bob Stoops OU team in Norman.  It's rare for a team to even play them close down there don't think NU ever has.  So really as is usually the case with head to head comparisons your comparison bs is pretty much worthless.   

OK, If I grant you a win against La La, which is probably accurate, you have to grant us a win against ISU which was clearly a fluke.  I admit that playing Oklahoma in Norman is harder than Lincoln so we won't talk about that game, but look at the other games.  KSU lost bad to Mizzou at home. Nebraska did not play a stellar game, gave Mizzou all of their points on mistakes, a lot due to the condtions, and still won easily. You guys were completely annihilated by Tech giving up like 700 yards.  We only gave up 259 yards and had a few costly mistakes. Kansas was a wash, I don't think either team was super pumped about their performance in that game.  The fact is, on paper, everyway you look at it Nebraska is a better team right now than KSU.  KSU is a much better team than I expected this season, and could possibly win this weekend (although it would need some help), but by all factors is not as good as Nebraska, that is why Vegas has us winning by 15. So if you are saying Nebraska isn't very good, and they might not be, than wtf is KSU?
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: thehusker1 on November 17, 2009, 11:20:39 AM
But we're better than you purple retards.   I can't find it, this is for Steve Dave(whatever that means)  if i see any K-Stater acting violent Saturday or if I hear any kind of disrespectful talk from someone in purple there will be a personal country ass-whippen handed out by me.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o144/League_of_Cantankerous_Misanthropes/InternetToughGuy.jpg)

Hick accent, damn straight.  One to whip your ass with. 
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: thehusker1 on November 17, 2009, 11:21:21 AM
Youre from Kansas.  Think about that. Kansas.  and you wear purple.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: cheapseats on November 17, 2009, 11:27:27 AM
Youre from Kansas.  Think about that. Kansas.  and you wear purple.

And you are from Nebraska and wear red.  People that wear red have homosexual tendencies
 :ku:.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 11:55:00 AM
Hmm..  This is a tough quandary.  Blue and Red makes purple.  I learned that in middle school art so I'm sure about that.  Apparently, the other fan is suggesting that purple is a homosexual color.  That would mean either the blue part is homosexual (I've heard some people mention Gay Hawks on here) so that is a possibility, or the Red part is homosexual ( I also read somewhere on the internet that communism is gay, but I'm not sure the guy was qualified to make that statement, after all it was posted after a youtube video of a Russian guy farting into a bread bag).  I wikipedia'ed homosexual, since I'd never heard of it growing up in Nebraska, and it says when two men or woman have sex with each other.  Knowing that the Red Baron was a man, I can only assume that Red is a manly color, and youtubing Blue and seeing the song Blue by Effiel 65, I can to the conclusion that was in fact the homosexual component of the equation.  Thereby the entire state of Kansas is homosexual (not that there's anything wrong with that) being that the Jay Hawks are blue and KState is purple which is made out of blue and red, and is thereby also homosexual, but manlier than ku.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 04:46:46 PM
Ok, I guess since it was uncontested we have determined that blue is in fact a homosexual color, and the state of Kansas as a whole is in fact a homosexual state (and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that!)
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Jmo on November 17, 2009, 05:00:29 PM
Ok, I guess since it was uncontested we have determined that blue is in fact a homosexual color, and the state of Kansas as a whole is in fact a homosexual state (and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that!)

So soon they forget about their two  :ku: wrestlers  :lol:  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 05:38:21 PM
Straight from Wikipedia "Today the color purple is also known as a "pride" color among the gay community." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple
I guess the wrestlers must've been color blind, but hey if they want to do gay wearing red that is their choice, although wikipedia clearly states that if you wear purple you are definitely gay.  It's a fact.  It's on the internet!
Is it going to be gay when Suh rapes your O-Line and Grant Gregory?
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: kstate16 on November 17, 2009, 05:39:48 PM
omg. i absolutely had no idea how retarded the nu fan base was.  :confused:
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 05:48:12 PM
You are right!  We are absolute retards!!  I wasn't lampooning the idea of a color making someone gay.  I was serious, and as you already know, this seriousness is what makes the difference in the outcome of this football game and ultimately in life, because I know deep down inside that if I make a witty point on this message board, you will change your mind and be forced to admit to me that my football team is better than yours, and that our colors are more manly than yours and you will definitely become gay for wearing purple.  It's a fact, it's in wikipedia, that's just like the bible.  Check it out bro!

Donkey Punch
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: FreemansCurse on November 17, 2009, 06:14:44 PM
1 - Purple is an accepted "Gay Pride" color.   :ku:

B - KStaters love wearing Purple.   :ku:

Tres - That's spanish for three.

Four - Adult Males who frequently wear purple are generally "homosexual".   :ku:

So, we can infer that since KStaters frequently wear purple, which is a "Gay Pride" color, that KStaters do indeed engage in homosexual practices.   :ku:

Gil Grissom would agree with this scientific analysis.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 17, 2009, 06:20:15 PM
1 - Purple is an accepted "Gay Pride" color.   :ku:

B - KStaters love wearing Purple.   :ku:

Tres - That's spanish for three.

Four - Adult Males who frequently wear purple are generally "homosexual".   :ku:

So, we can infer that since KStaters frequently wear purple, which is a "Gay Pride" color, that KStaters do indeed engage in homosexual practices.   :ku:


Gil Grissom would agree with this scientific analysis.


Like your wrestlers?
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 17, 2009, 07:30:44 PM
1 - Purple is an accepted "Gay Pride" color.   :ku:

B - KStaters love wearing Purple.   :ku:

Tres - That's spanish for three.

Four - Adult Males who frequently wear purple are generally "homosexual".   :ku:

So, we can infer that since KStaters frequently wear purple, which is a "Gay Pride" color, that KStaters do indeed engage in homosexual practices.   :ku:


Gil Grissom would agree with this scientific analysis.


Like your wrestlers?
Isn't that what wrestlers are supposed to do?  I've never actually watched a match, but it seems like a lot of rough gay stuff to me to start with so why would you be that surprised?  Who cares if they are gay, or if you are gay for wearing purple. It obviously didn't make them worse at it, one of them was a national champ.  I've heard Cordell Stewart, and Ricky Williams are gay and you can bet your a$$ that if they were on my team I would cheer my a$$ for them, and if they were on a team we were playing against I would give them Sh*t for it, just like we give Bill Snyder sh*t for being old, Mangino Sh*t for being fat, and Ndamokong Suh sh*t for having a f'd up name, and Eric Crouch sh*t for being a white.  That's what sports fans do, that's why we are on this message board. So let's crack a couple of cold ones :beerchug: give each other a bunch of sh*t and have a good time. F*^k K-State, Go Big Red! Kiss my a$$. Donkey Punch.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: vanro031 on November 17, 2009, 08:39:13 PM
Yeah, but if they hadn't turned the ball over eight times against ISU, they would have won easily.  Talk about a fluke loss.

This is kind of my point.  I live in Nebraska and if you talk to those Cornholers, they say they would be 9 - 1 if it wasn't for 8 turnovers against Iowa State and a last second touchdown by Virginia Tech.  Selective memory.

yeah, well everyone can play that game.

What if Josh Cherry shows up against Lafayette. We're sitting at 7 wins and saying "well, we might not win the North but we're going bowling at least"...

so......homerism has always been a part of the game.
True statement. Both programs are having issues this year. The entire Big 12 North is having issues..
We all need one big Prozac.. :banghead:
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: catdude33 on November 17, 2009, 09:11:10 PM
weird thread.
Title: Re: Nebraska just isn't that good
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 17, 2009, 09:24:32 PM
I love when you do that.