KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on November 11, 2009, 12:36:06 AM

Title: nu's offense
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 11, 2009, 12:36:06 AM
wow.

http://www.omaha.com/article/20091110/BIGRED/711109817/0/FRONTPAGE
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: purplebybirth on November 11, 2009, 12:55:22 AM
jfc. we could beat them 3-0 with the right gameplan/execution.  the star wars "turn the ball over you won't" picture will be f*cking true in this game.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: KITNfury on November 11, 2009, 06:22:57 AM
If Banks returns the opening kickoff for a TD, game over.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 06:41:09 AM
I have a feeling that banks and Lamark will be open deep several times.  Gotta get them the ball.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: doom on November 11, 2009, 06:44:17 AM
I have a feeling that banks and Lamark will be open deep several times.  Gotta get them the ball.

 :blank:

read the article, kiddo.  If you think anyone will be open deep on the house of spears' senior day you are crazy.  Just gotta keep the ball on our end and wait for the few opportunities their line will give us.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Perry on November 11, 2009, 07:22:41 AM
>>>>>>> MIZZOU <<<<<<<<

Nubb can get our attention on Sunday :steadymobbin':
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Lynch on November 11, 2009, 07:42:23 AM
>>>>>>> MIZZOU <<<<<<<<

Nubb can get our attention on Sunday :steadymobbin':

Really this game won't matter if we don't beat Mizzou. We would be trying to survive for a bowl and that hasn't worked to well for us in the past.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Wildcat Jack on November 11, 2009, 07:48:46 AM
>>>>>>> MIZZOU <<<<<<<<

Nubb can get our attention on Sunday :steadymobbin':

Really this game won't matter if we don't beat Mizzou. We would be trying to survive for a bowl and that hasn't worked to well for us in the past.

Actually not quite...Nubb matters for everything...only game thats gonna allow for a meaningful championship shot this season.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on November 11, 2009, 07:52:05 AM
This game is going to shock everyone.  It always happens in a game you expect to be 10-6 or less.  It'll end up being 42-38.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 08:11:38 AM
This game is going to shock everyone.  It always happens in a game you expect to be 10-6 or less.  It'll end up being 42-38.

I think our O is pretty comfortable and has an identity finally, when that happens you can start to open it up. 

Nubb has no identity on offense.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 11, 2009, 08:31:16 AM
Man, that only confirms one thing; Nebraska's defense is incredible. 
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ednksu on November 11, 2009, 08:37:45 AM
Man, that only confirms one thing; Nebraska's defense is incredible. 

Nubb didn't impress me for one reason against OU.  They are only north south and do not react well to rolling the pocket.  GG and our O-line have gotten pretty good at doing just that.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 11, 2009, 08:49:14 AM
Man, that only confirms one thing; Nebraska's defense is incredible. 

Nubb didn't impress me for one reason against OU.  They are only north south and do not react well to rolling the pocket.  GG and our O-line have gotten pretty good at doing just that.

I get that, but OU did score three (3) points.  Three.  The last time OU was held without a TD was 1998.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 09:33:55 AM
we just need to chop block SUH and tear blow out his knee early.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cooter on November 11, 2009, 09:35:37 AM
OU sucks hard on the road.  You play them in Norman you loose.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: 85catbacker on November 11, 2009, 09:39:30 AM
Man, that only confirms one thing; Nebraska's defense is incredible.  

Nubb didn't impress me for one reason against OU.  They are only north south and do not react well to rolling the pocket.  GG and our O-line have gotten pretty good at doing just that.

I get that, but OU did score three (3) points.  Three.  The last time OU was held without a TD was 1998.

True but OU's OL is realy bad this year.  NU's DL is probably one of the best in the country.  Add in a FR QB with an off night and a OC that didn't know what to do to attack NU's D and you have a good recipe for not being able to score.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: mcmwcat on November 11, 2009, 09:41:58 AM
hopefully Suh dies after drunk driving this weekend.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: WildcatNkilt on November 11, 2009, 10:19:11 AM
hopefully Suh dies after drunk driving this weekend.

Now thats just a little over the top.    :nono:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Pett on November 11, 2009, 10:42:01 AM
For the Big XII's sake, I hope that we get into the Dr. Pepper CCG.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Perry on November 11, 2009, 10:44:46 AM
For the Big XII's sake I hope we get into the Dr. Pepper CCG.

How pissed will the BCS be when it has to let us into the Fiesta, and then screw tcu or someone out of a bowl to make room for Tejas?
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 10:47:48 AM
THis game will be about our Offense and ST making big plays and not turning the ball over.

If we can keep it close in the first half/3 quarters we can try and take it in the 4th.

I trust OB to solve Dumbass Brothers' defense. for 1 4th quarter td drive that takes the lead.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: catzacker on November 11, 2009, 10:49:08 AM
we just need to chop block SUH and tear blow out his knee early.

they announcers actually said on the broadcast of the OU/nu game that suh indicated that Baylor did alot of cut blocking on him and it kind of slowed/bothered him quite a bit.  hopefully snyds & co. do this, especially to allow DT to cut back.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 10:55:40 AM
we just need to chop block SUH and tear blow out his knee early.

they announcers actually said on the broadcast of the OU/nu game that suh indicated that Baylor did alot of cut blocking on him and it kind of slowed/bothered him quite a bit.  hopefully snyds & co. do this, especially to allow DT to cut back.

lots of cutting in the option game

 :pray:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: mcmwcat on November 11, 2009, 11:01:54 AM
For the Big XII's sake I hope we get into the Dr. Pepper CCG.

How pissed will the BCS be when it has to let us into the Fiesta, and then screw tcu or someone out of a bowl to make room for Tejas?

like the Gooners back in Aught3 the Bonghorns will be playing in BCS championship after losing their own conference championship game.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 11, 2009, 11:03:39 AM
we just need to chop block SUH and tear blow out his knee early.

they announcers actually said on the broadcast of the OU/nu game that suh indicated that Baylor did alot of cut blocking on him and it kind of slowed/bothered him quite a bit.  hopefully snyds & co. do this, especially to allow DT to cut back.

Note to Suh, the cut block is legal in college football.  And when you are really good, that's what most teams are going to do.  Now, if they were high-lowing or chop blocking you, that's one thing, but cut blocking is just something that's going to happen against a good D-lineman.  Tell your LBs to take advantage of it b/c that should mean OL-man are getting to them.  
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: mjrod on November 11, 2009, 11:23:52 AM
Man, that only confirms one thing; Nebraska's defense is incredible. 

Nubb didn't impress me for one reason against OU.  They are only north south and do not react well to rolling the pocket.  GG and our O-line have gotten pretty good at doing just that.

I get that, but OU did score three (3) points.  Three.  The last time OU was held without a TD was 1998.

Didn't help that Jones was overthrowing his receivers.  Pelini picked up and adjusted his safeties to be over the top and it rained christmas presents.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 11, 2009, 12:01:41 PM
Even If you find some way to knock Suh out of the game  you still have to deal with Crick, and Suh's back up is Baker Steinkuhler a high school 5 star and also a beast.  OU tried to take advantage of him when Suh was out of the game and all those plays resulted in loss of yardage.  As far as moving the pocket see NU vs. VA Tech.  Gregory maybe mobile but he is not Tyrod Taylor and they shut him down all day except for one pass, so don't just assume that is the answer.  Banks may be able to break a kickoff, but don't assume he is going to get that opportunity.  Adi kunalic is the national leader for kicking touchbacks.  Take the under, this will not be a surprise game, there will be very few points scored.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 12:12:06 PM
Even If you find some way to knock Suh out of the game  you still have to deal with Crick, and Suh's back up is Baker Steinkuhler a high school 5 star and also a beast.  OU tried to take advantage of him when Suh was out of the game and all those plays resulted in loss of yardage.  As far as moving the pocket see NU vs. VA Tech.  Gregory maybe mobile but he is not Tyrod Taylor and they shut him down all day except for one pass, so don't just assume that is the answer.  Banks may be able to break a kickoff, but don't assume he is going to get that opportunity.  Adi kunalic is the national leader for kicking touchbacks.  Take the under, this will not be a surprise game, there will be very few points scored.


qft, why bother even playing.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksuFB on November 11, 2009, 12:12:38 PM
we just need to chop block SUH and tear blow out his knee early.

they announcers actually said on the broadcast of the OU/nu game that suh indicated that Baylor did alot of cut blocking on him and it kind of slowed/bothered him quite a bit.  hopefully snyds & co. do this, especially to allow DT to cut back.
Wrong. They did mention it but Suh said that it really didn't hinder his rush any.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Butt Fugly on November 11, 2009, 12:13:18 PM
Even If you find some way to knock Suh out of the game  you still have to deal with Crick, and Suh's back up is Baker Steinkuhler a high school 5 star and also a beast.  OU tried to take advantage of him when Suh was out of the game and all those plays resulted in loss of yardage.  As far as moving the pocket see NU vs. VA Tech.  Gregory maybe mobile but he is not Tyrod Taylor and they shut him down all day except for one pass, so don't just assume that is the answer.  Banks may be able to break a kickoff, but don't assume he is going to get that opportunity.  Adi kunalic is the national leader for kicking touchbacks.  Take the under, this will not be a surprise game, there will be very few points scored.

Well 5 star Baker Steinkuhler never played against 5 heart Nick Stringer.



(Thanks oudji for 5 heart)
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksuFB on November 11, 2009, 12:15:25 PM
Even If you find some way to knock Suh out of the game  you still have to deal with Crick, and Suh's back up is Baker Steinkuhler a high school 5 star and also a beast.  OU tried to take advantage of him when Suh was out of the game and all those plays resulted in loss of yardage.  As far as moving the pocket see NU vs. VA Tech.  Gregory maybe mobile but he is not Tyrod Taylor and they shut him down all day except for one pass, so don't just assume that is the answer.  Banks may be able to break a kickoff, but don't assume he is going to get that opportunity.  Adi kunalic is the national leader for kicking touchbacks.  Take the under, this will not be a surprise game, there will be very few points scored.

 :facepalm: Your first mistake was coming to this board and trying to talk FB rationally. Next they will change your password to login and then an Administrator will change your handle. Kind of like back in grade school.
Nice try though :thumbsup:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: vanro03 on November 11, 2009, 12:45:23 PM
Huskers don't need any O...
Here's why...
Nebraska has had the Nagurski National Player of the Week in the past 2 weeks and 3 of the past 5 weeks. Pretty impressive...

Here's a list of winners by week:

2009 Bronko Nagurski National Defensive Players of the Week
• Sept. 5: B.W. Webb, William & Mary
• Sept. 12: Nate Triplett, Minnesota
• Sept. 19: Donald Butler, Washington
• Sept. 26: Pat Angerer, Iowa
• Oct. 3: Rolando McClain, Alabama
• Oct. 10: Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
• Oct. 17: Ryan Kerrigan, Purdue
• Oct. 24: DeAndre McDaniel, Clemson
• Oct. 31: Jared Crick, Nebraska
• Nov. 7: Matt O'Hanlon, Nebraska
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: jester66 on November 11, 2009, 01:05:09 PM
Huskers don't need any O...
Here's why...
Nebraska has had the Nagurski National Player of the Week in the past 2 weeks and 3 of the past 5 weeks. Pretty impressive...

Here's a list of winners by week:

2009 Bronko Nagurski National Defensive Players of the Week
• Sept. 5: B.W. Webb, William & Mary
• Sept. 12: Nate Triplett, Minnesota
• Sept. 19: Donald Butler, Washington
• Sept. 26: Pat Angerer, Iowa
• Oct. 3: Rolando McClain, Alabama
• Oct. 10: Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
• Oct. 17: Ryan Kerrigan, Purdue
• Oct. 24: DeAndre McDaniel, Clemson
• Oct. 31: Jared Crick, Nebraska
• Nov. 7: Matt O'Hanlon, Nebraska

Wow!!! We had you guys all wrong.  Apparently, you propose we play you in a game where only your defense gets to play and we agree to pass.  I think our coach would be more than thrilled to play field position and never give you the gifts that Stoops had to offer.   
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 11, 2009, 01:15:56 PM
Is it possible for NU's defense to hold us to negative points?  I'm getting worried it might.   :ohno:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: jester66 on November 11, 2009, 01:21:03 PM
Is it possible for NU's defense to hold us to negative points?  I'm getting worried it might.   :ohno:

What the hell did you think the N on the helmet stood for?
Final score:
NU 0
KSU -eleventy billion
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: vanro03 on November 11, 2009, 01:49:13 PM
Is it possible for NU's defense to hold us to negative points?  I'm getting worried it might.   :ohno:
Only OUR offense can generate negative points. :P
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: vanro03 on November 11, 2009, 01:50:51 PM
Quote
I think our coach would be more than thrilled to play field position and never give you the gifts that Stoops had to offer.   
I only wish someone had given you the gift of a IQ.. :yikes:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cireksu on November 11, 2009, 01:53:04 PM
Even If you find some way to knock Suh out of the game  you still have to deal with Crick, and Suh's back up is Baker Steinkuhler a high school 5 star and also a beast.  OU tried to take advantage of him when Suh was out of the game and all those plays resulted in loss of yardage.  As far as moving the pocket see NU vs. VA Tech.  Gregory maybe mobile but he is not Tyrod Taylor and they shut him down all day except for one pass, so don't just assume that is the answer.  Banks may be able to break a kickoff, but don't assume he is going to get that opportunity.  Adi kunalic is the national leader for kicking touchbacks.  Take the under, this will not be a surprise game, there will be very few points scored.

 :facepalm: Your first mistake was coming to this board and trying to talk FB rationally. Next they will change your password to login and then an Administrator will change your handle. Kind of like back in grade school.
Nice try though :thumbsup:

why don't you take some homo pics with your homo wrestler friends.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: JTKSU on November 11, 2009, 02:39:47 PM
Even If you find some way to knock Suh out of the game  you still have to deal with Crick, and Suh's back up is Baker Steinkuhler a high school 5 star and also a beast.  OU tried to take advantage of him when Suh was out of the game and all those plays resulted in loss of yardage.  As far as moving the pocket see NU vs. VA Tech.  Gregory maybe mobile but he is not Tyrod Taylor and they shut him down all day except for one pass, so don't just assume that is the answer.  Banks may be able to break a kickoff, but don't assume he is going to get that opportunity.  Adi kunalic is the national leader for kicking touchbacks.  Take the under, this will not be a surprise game, there will be very few points scored.

Why don't you count up the number of 5* dudes you have on offense and figure out some sort of spin concerning their inability to score against the average middle school team?
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: vanro03 on November 11, 2009, 02:42:40 PM
Quote
their inability to score against the average middle school team?
Like LA LA that you guys played?
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: JTKSU on November 11, 2009, 02:45:06 PM
Quote
their inability to score against the average middle school team?
Like LA LA that you guys played?

I was actually referring to ISU.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: vanro03 on November 11, 2009, 04:39:52 PM
Quote
their inability to score against the average middle school team?
Like LA LA that you guys played?

I was actually referring to ISU.
The team that should have beaten KSU? If ISU had a kicker it's another KSU lose.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: da govna on November 11, 2009, 04:57:48 PM
Quote
their inability to score against the average middle school team?
Like LA LA that you guys played?

I was actually referring to ISU.
The team that should have beaten KSU? If ISU had a kicker it's another KSU lose.

ummm, wasnt that kick blocked? :dunno:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: cyclist on November 11, 2009, 05:02:10 PM
Quote
their inability to score against the average middle school team?
Like LA LA that you guys played?

I was actually referring to ISU.
The team that should have beaten KSU? If ISU had a kicker it's another KSU lose.

Kick was blocked and you are assuming that ISU would have won in OT. 

Who really knows ?

Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on November 11, 2009, 05:06:22 PM
Huskers don't need any O...
Here's why...
Nebraska has had the Nagurski National Player of the Week in the past 2 weeks and 3 of the past 5 weeks. Pretty impressive...

Here's a list of winners by week:

2009 Bronko Nagurski National Defensive Players of the Week
• Sept. 5: B.W. Webb, William & Mary
• Sept. 12: Nate Triplett, Minnesota
• Sept. 19: Donald Butler, Washington
• Sept. 26: Pat Angerer, Iowa
• Oct. 3: Rolando McClain, Alabama
• Oct. 10: Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
• Oct. 17: Ryan Kerrigan, Purdue
• Oct. 24: DeAndre McDaniel, Clemson
• Oct. 31: Jared Crick, Nebraska
• Nov. 7: Matt O'Hanlon, Nebraska

If B.W. Webb out of William & Mary wins it, it is impressive.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: catdude33 on November 11, 2009, 05:29:35 PM
The only thing that worries me about the NU game is Pelini physically assaulting Snyder after we win by 30+.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: vanro03 on November 11, 2009, 05:38:28 PM
The only thing that worries me about the NU game is Pelini physically assaulting Snyder after we win by 30+.

Looks like you will have no worries that weekend.. :nahnah:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: JTKSU on November 11, 2009, 09:25:09 PM
Yeah I certainly don't worry about Bo throwing any punches.  It's real hard to fight while you're bawling hysterically.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: doom on November 11, 2009, 09:56:07 PM
O'Hanlon sucks and you know it.  Your secondary is not that stellar overall.  IMO Crick and Suh are just so good they get the secondary more opportunities/leeway than they deserve. 

I'm interested to see how Nubs does against a team that does not throw the ball.  I'm going to call nu2 ksu 0.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Thin Blue Line on November 11, 2009, 10:15:54 PM
Is it possible for NU's defense to hold us to negative points?  I'm getting worried it might.   :ohno:

Quit being a pussy.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: jthutch on November 11, 2009, 10:31:19 PM
O'Hanlon sucks and you know it.  Your secondary is not that stellar overall.  IMO Crick and Suh are just so good they get the secondary more opportunities/leeway than they deserve. 

I'm interested to see how Nubs does against a team that does not throw the ball.  I'm going to call nu2 ksu 0.

Good call I was going to say NU 5 KSU 3.  I think we turn them over inside the 30 once and make a field goal.

Crap what am I talking about we turn them over 3 times and score on 2 of them NU 5 KSU 6  KAHTS WIN!!!!

 :steadymobbin':
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Bookcat on November 11, 2009, 10:32:26 PM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: jthutch on November 11, 2009, 10:41:26 PM
Why would we need 24 in Lincoln they barley score double digits this year.  The only way they score that much is if they get a couple of pick six and or a fumble for a TD.  I don't see it happening.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: JTKSU on November 12, 2009, 01:43:55 AM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.

Why?  They couldn't put up a single TD against a mediocre ISU defense.  What makes you think they can score 3+ TDS on our defense?
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksuFB on November 12, 2009, 07:18:02 AM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Brilliant! Brilliant! Hats off to you sir!!

Getting a head start on blaming your loss on the officiating. You are a true visionary and a man ahead of his time. I'm surprised Limestone and JT didn't beat you to it.

 :clap:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 12, 2009, 01:38:50 PM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Homered?  Like this no call in Manhattan (http://www.huskerpedia.com/images/grab.jpg)
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ednksu on November 12, 2009, 01:54:35 PM
1) Nubbs d is only good north to south, runs between the tackles. 
2) TT at V-Tech sucks donkey balls and has cost them more games then he has won for them.  He is a terrible QB.  (I watch more ACC FB then you.
3) Roll the pocket to avoid the rush.  This is where the comparison between GG and TT falls apart.  GG can toss the ball down field somewhat accurately.  TT, &@#% no. 
4) Use slants and screens to get in behind the line.  I don't see your line doing well in coverage.  Your LBs maybe able to cover the run, but I'm not sold on them being able handle quick small backs and receivers. 
5) Snyder made the game plan against OU that you guys used to win.  Do you really think Bo and his boys are going to figure out Snyder?  Ever game we win, we have closed the play book in the second half, save ISU and OU.  Every loss same thing, book closed back to fundamentals. There will probably be something that Bo hasn't even dreamed of yet.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: hemmy on November 12, 2009, 02:08:19 PM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Homered?  Like this no call in Manhattan (http://www.huskerpedia.com/images/grab.jpg)

incidental, 5 yarder at most
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksuFB on November 12, 2009, 02:16:42 PM
1) Nubbs d is only good north to south, runs between the tackles. 
2) TT at V-Tech sucks donkey balls and has cost them more games then he has won for them.  He is a terrible QB.  (I watch more ACC FB then you.
3) Roll the pocket to avoid the rush.  This is where the comparison between GG and TT falls apart.  GG can toss the ball down field somewhat accurately.  TT, frack no. 
4) Use slants and screens to get in behind the line.  I don't see your line doing well in coverage.  Your LBs maybe able to cover the run, but I'm not sold on them being able handle quick small backs and receivers. 
5) Snyder made the game plan against OU that you guys used to win.  Do you really think Bo and his boys are going to figure out Snyder?  Ever game we win, we have closed the play book in the second half, save ISU and OU.  Every loss same thing, book closed back to fundamentals. There will probably be something that Bo hasn't even dreamed of yet.
Well, I stand corrected! With your obvious HIGH FB IQ you obviously must be a coach in either the NFL or at some Major College.
Look Genius in 07 NU was 114th in defense, Bo comes, first year we go to 55th in defense. Now NU is in the top 10 in defense. If you believe that Bo had to use Snyd's plan you are amusing yourself.
Since you know ALL of us so well and know what and how much football we watch, you must be clairvoyant. Bo didn't learn any coaching from his years in the NFL right? Those shiny gold Super Bowl and Natl. Championship rings don't mean anything either right?
Pretty much sure that Bo has seen anything that Snyd's can throw out there.

With your in-depth analysis and obvious high mental capabilities you are definitely a prophet!! :rofl:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: jester66 on November 12, 2009, 02:19:01 PM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Homered?  Like this no call in Manhattan (http://www.huskerpedia.com/images/grab.jpg)

incidental, 5 yarder at most
Still not convinced.  But love the picture....had NOTHING to do with the outcome of the game.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 12, 2009, 05:20:41 PM
1) Nubbs d is only good north to south, runs between the tackles. 
2) TT at V-Tech sucks donkey balls and has cost them more games then he has won for them.  He is a terrible QB.  (I watch more ACC FB then you.
3) Roll the pocket to avoid the rush.  This is where the comparison between GG and TT falls apart.  GG can toss the ball down field somewhat accurately.  TT, frack no. 
4) Use slants and screens to get in behind the line.  I don't see your line doing well in coverage.  Your LBs maybe able to cover the run, but I'm not sold on them being able handle quick small backs and receivers. 
5) Snyder made the game plan against OU that you guys used to win.  Do you really think Bo and his boys are going to figure out Snyder?  Ever game we win, we have closed the play book in the second half, save ISU and OU.  Every loss same thing, book closed back to fundamentals. There will probably be something that Bo hasn't even dreamed of yet.
Stick with that plan.  Barry Turner or Dennard haven't been National Defensive player of the week yet, sounds like a perfect plan to give them that opportunity.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: VGibsonLives on November 12, 2009, 06:47:25 PM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Homered?  Like this no call in Manhattan (http://www.huskerpedia.com/images/grab.jpg)
Nice photo shop  :P
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 12, 2009, 09:58:40 PM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: doom on November 12, 2009, 10:05:57 PM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 12, 2009, 10:11:43 PM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
It's fine to have that opinion but tell me how?  What are you going to do in that game that you weren't able to do in the other common games?
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Thin Blue Line on November 12, 2009, 10:32:19 PM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
It's fine to have that opinion but tell me how?  What are you going to do in that game that you weren't able to do in the other common games?

Keep getting better? You remember how that was. Doc Tom wasn't all that long ago.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: JTKSU on November 12, 2009, 10:33:00 PM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
It's fine to have that opinion but tell me how?  What are you going to do in that game that you weren't able to do in the other common games?

Well, we don't have a goddamn retard for a head coach, nor do we have a retard's retard brother as a coordinator.  Huge edge for the Cats in that area.
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Bookie Pimp on November 13, 2009, 12:35:35 AM
It seems as if we can keep from getting homered by the big red zebras we might be able to keep a few drives going and score a couple TD's. I'm thinking Kstate needs at least 24 points to win in Lincoln.
Homered?  Like this no call in Manhattan (http://www.huskerpedia.com/images/grab.jpg)

Congrats.  I never dreamt that somebody would bring this up ELEVEN years after the fact.

You proved me wrong.

 :skillz:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: ksuFB on November 13, 2009, 07:51:29 AM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
It's fine to have that opinion but tell me how?  What are you going to do in that game that you weren't able to do in the other common games?

Well, we don't have a goddamn retard for a head coach, nor do we have a retard's retard brother as a coordinator.  Huge edge for the Cats in that area.
You're gonna smoke a turd in hell for that one. Must make you sick to know that a retard makes about $2,000,000 more a year than you do, huh? :powertard:
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: Donkeypunch on November 13, 2009, 10:01:22 AM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
It's fine to have that opinion but tell me how?  What are you going to do in that game that you weren't able to do in the other common games?

Well, we don't have a goddamn retard for a head coach, nor do we have a retard's retard brother as a coordinator.  Huge edge for the Cats in that area.
Ugly doesn't = Retarded, Good Looking doesn't= Smart.  If it did I would be smart enough to not try to argue logically with someone from K-State ;)
Title: Re: nu's offense
Post by: mjrod on November 13, 2009, 11:05:47 AM
NU Offense vs. KSU Offense Common Opponents- Louisiana Lafeyette, Texas Tech, ISU, Oklahoma

Nebraska- 82  KSU-83. Slight edge KSU

NU Defense vs. KSU Defense-

Nebraska- 43 (27 points actually given up by Defense, not safeties or pick 6's) KSU- 148  Major advantage Nebraska's Defense.

Total Point differental

NU- +39 KSU- -65  = 104 points in NU's Favor
To be fair Nebraska played all of these games at Home and KSU was on the road.  But the game is being played in Lincoln.  KSU only has one road win, and I'm pretty sure Lincoln is a lot more intimidating than Ames. Of course you should be hopeful for your team, and if you do win I'll cheer for you in the Big XII championship, but the reality is that it won't be easy,

I'm not saying that they shouldn't play the game, or that K-State has no chance of winning this game, but I also would try to keep the sh*t talking to a minimum if the situation was reversed and I was in your shoes, and try to legitimately figure out what your best chance of winning the game is.

You guyz are gonna get creamed!  Get it?  Like creamed corn?  booyah!
It's fine to have that opinion but tell me how?  What are you going to do in that game that you weren't able to do in the other common games?

Well, we don't have a goddamn retard for a head coach, nor do we have a retard's retard brother as a coordinator.  Huge edge for the Cats in that area.
Ugly doesn't = Retarded, Good Looking doesn't= Smart.  If it did I would be smart enough to not try to argue logically with someone from K-State ;)

Well, in Bo's case, he's both retarded and ugly.. just one of those freaks of nature I guess.