KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: EllToPay on November 09, 2009, 04:04:04 PM

Title: Our defensive secondary
Post by: EllToPay on November 09, 2009, 04:04:04 PM
Junior, Sophomore, Sophomore, Junior/Sophomore (Garrett/Harrison)

...with a freshman playing almost full time right now (D. Thomas)
 
:eek:
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: michigancat on November 09, 2009, 04:08:24 PM
Junior, Sophomore, Sophomore, Junior/Sophomore (Garrett/Harrison)

...with a freshman playing almost full time right now (D. Thomas)
 
:eek:


you realize we're last in pass defense and 11th in pass efficiency d in conference games, right?

:dunno:

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=99216
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: EllToPay on November 09, 2009, 04:14:41 PM
Junior, Sophomore, Sophomore, Junior/Sophomore (Garrett/Harrison)

...with a freshman playing almost full time right now (D. Thomas)
 
:eek:


you realize we're last in pass defense and 11th in pass efficiency d in conference games, right?

:dunno:

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=99216

skewed because we've had 29 more attempts than the next closest team (due to playing an extra game). we also haven't played nebraska yet.

also, just held the passing juggernaut of ku to its fewest points since 2005 against OU (disregarding their game against ut last year in which they scored 7).

tt is also an anomaly.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: michigancat on November 09, 2009, 04:16:06 PM
Junior, Sophomore, Sophomore, Junior/Sophomore (Garrett/Harrison)

...with a freshman playing almost full time right now (D. Thomas)
 
:eek:


you realize we're last in pass defense and 11th in pass efficiency d in conference games, right?

:dunno:

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=99216

skewed because we've had 29 more attempts than the next closest team (due to playing an extra game). we also haven't played nebraska yet.

also, just held the passing juggernaut of ku to its fewest points since 2005 against OU (disregarding their game against ut last year in which they scored 7).

tt is also an anomaly.

efficiency and ypg are not skewed because of number of games.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: EllToPay on November 09, 2009, 04:19:23 PM
Junior, Sophomore, Sophomore, Junior/Sophomore (Garrett/Harrison)

...with a freshman playing almost full time right now (D. Thomas)
 
:eek:


you realize we're last in pass defense and 11th in pass efficiency d in conference games, right?

:dunno:

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=99216

skewed because we've had 29 more attempts than the next closest team (due to playing an extra game). we also haven't played nebraska yet.

also, just held the passing juggernaut of ku to its fewest points since 2005 against OU (disregarding their game against ut last year in which they scored 7).

tt is also an anomaly.

efficiency and ypg are not skewed because of number of games.

also, just held the passing juggernaut of ku to its fewest points since 2005 against OU (disregarding their game against ut last year in which they scored 7).

tt is also an anomaly.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: cireksu on November 09, 2009, 04:38:29 PM
We won the game because of 3 tos. This d needs to s to win.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on November 09, 2009, 04:49:02 PM
The secondary has been good at preventing the big play, but we've had corners biting big on play action and playing extremely soft coverage in the middle.  That soft coverage is what allowed OU to convert 1st and 45 or whatever disgusting number that was.  Good quarterbacks can take advantage of it, especially if they have time to get through all of their progressions.  If our linebackers were a threat in pass coverage that would help, but they're just not.

They have been very good in run support, and improved in tackling from last year.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: EllToPay on November 09, 2009, 04:52:31 PM
The secondary has been good at preventing the big play, but we've had corners biting big on play action and playing extremely soft coverage in the middle.  That soft coverage is what allowed OU to convert 1st and 45 or whatever disgusting number that was.  Good quarterbacks can take advantage of it, especially if they have time to get through all of their progressions.  If our linebackers were a threat in pass coverage that would help, but they're just not.

They have been very good in run support, and improved in tackling from last year.

boom.

the point is to show that we're 4-2 with two sophs, two juniors and a frosh leading the way in the secondary. they'll get better, too.

coach em up, bill.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: cireksu on November 09, 2009, 04:57:24 PM
A linebacker not tackling a wide receiver is what have them a 1st down on 1st and 45. We get a stop or to there we might win
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 09, 2009, 04:57:32 PM
great topic ELLTOPAY! I agree! We ARE AMAZING AND NOTHING IS GOING TO STOP US!
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: PoetWarrior on November 09, 2009, 07:12:24 PM
They're a cool looking bunch.
Title: Re: Our defensive secondary
Post by: Dick Knewheizel on November 09, 2009, 07:58:23 PM
I though Harrison was a Senior????

Our secondary is very inconsistent, but I like our 3 safeties, they're really good.