KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: SuperG on November 06, 2009, 03:06:10 AM

Title: Who was better?
Post by: SuperG on November 06, 2009, 03:06:10 AM
My gut reaction is Michael. But I don't know why. I've never looked at the stats or anything. I kind of assumed that it was a given, but then I just thought about it and it's not a given really.

Please help me. Vote.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: bfred on November 06, 2009, 03:07:13 AM
michael for sure, regardless of... I can't even type it out, too painful  :crybaby:
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: SuperG on November 06, 2009, 03:09:41 AM
It is the thing that we shall not speak of. Thank you for not.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: Cautiously Optimistic on November 06, 2009, 03:26:58 AM
Oh... are you guys talking about the time Bishop fumbled the ball in the Big XII Championship?  And if I remember right he could have just taken a knee and the game would have been over and we would have played for the National Championship and most likely won it!!!!!  Is that what you're talking about?
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: GP76 on November 06, 2009, 08:17:20 AM
Michael take a knee!!!  Are you drunk already....   To even say Michael and take a knee in the same sentence show me how mistaken you are about who he was.   That is exactly why he was the best. :confused: :confused:
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: KSUTOMMY on November 06, 2009, 08:32:02 AM
Michael take a knee!!!  Are you drunk already....   To even say Michael and take a knee in the same sentence show me how mistaken you are about who he was.   That is exactly why he was the best. :confused: :confused:

d00d was a gamer to a fault, thats for sure. but I vote for Michael, he had a CANNON on his shoulder and he made sugar out of $h!t on more occasions than I can remember.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: jthutch on November 06, 2009, 08:35:10 AM
Bishop made Donavin McNabb look like at 2nd rate QB in the Feista Bowl, Our Defense helped a little too.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: Pete on November 06, 2009, 08:39:46 AM
Bishop by a country mile.

Both of them did stupid stuff that cost us big games, but Bishop was at least trying to score on the football field when his mistake occurred.  Plus, Bishop was WAY better at playing football than Ell.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: PurplePride74 on November 06, 2009, 08:52:44 AM
Bishop made Donavin McNabb look like at 2nd rate QB in the Feista Bowl, Our Defense helped a little too.

Always wondered after watching that game...  Why did McNabb make it in NFL and Bishop not even get a sniff?  Weren't they both "dual threat" type QB's?

Educate me please, TIA.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: Pete on November 06, 2009, 08:54:33 AM
Bishop made Donavin McNabb look like at 2nd rate QB in the Feista Bowl, Our Defense helped a little too.

Always wondered after watching that game...  Why did McNabb make it in NFL and Bishop not even get a sniff?  Weren't they both "dual threat" type QB's?

Educate me please, TIA.

Mike has some troubles with the NFL playbook.  Words in it and so forth....
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: jaa1025 on November 06, 2009, 08:57:38 AM
Bishop made Donavin McNabb look like at 2nd rate QB in the Feista Bowl, Our Defense helped a little too.

Always wondered after watching that game...  Why did McNabb make it in NFL and Bishop not even get a sniff?  Weren't they both "dual threat" type QB's?

Educate me please, TIA.

Michael had the physical tools but lacked everything above his shoulders...he really struggled with the playbook that NE had apparently. Which BTW, if he would have played 5 years later he would have been a #1 pick IMO. He's lightyears better than Tebow. I think he was better than Michael Vick as well...just not AS fast.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: pwrcat1 on November 06, 2009, 09:01:42 AM
Bish, for all the above stated reasons.  Plus, being 1st cousins with Jaime Foxx just drips w/ eliteness.  This elite train goes both ways, too, 'cause take away Foxx's familial relations to the Bish and his movies become uglier than a baboons butt.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: cas on November 06, 2009, 06:23:54 PM
Bish is better.

But I love Ell more.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: sonofchadmay on November 06, 2009, 07:14:29 PM
Ell.  He won a conference championship.  Completely clown suited OU.  Warrior.  Getting in Lord's face prior to the game and then backing it up was certainly elite.  If he would have kept it in his pants that night (or at least in his girlfriends instead of the crazy chick) he would have a Fiesta Bowl too. 
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: Olathecatbanker on November 06, 2009, 07:37:21 PM
Snyder QB's
Best was Bishop but it is close
Toughest was Carl Straw, dude had nothing in front of him when Snyder got here.
Favorite was Beasley, fat and slow but 2-0 in big bowl games, bailed out Bishop against TT, the 00 game against nu with the snow at the end  :ksu:
Worst was Smargessio dude was such a prick that the o-line ole blocked.
Title: Re: Who was better?
Post by: hemmy on November 06, 2009, 08:05:20 PM
Oh... are you guys talking about the time Bishop fumbled the ball in the Big XII Championship?  And if I remember right he could have just taken a knee and the game would have been over and we would have played for the National Championship and most likely won it!!!!!  Is that what you're talking about?

You do not remember right.