KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: WildcatNkilt on November 03, 2009, 10:31:19 PM

Title: Bentard
Post by: WildcatNkilt on November 03, 2009, 10:31:19 PM
Where you at?

 :impatient:

Give me your predictions for Saturday. Also, give me an update on uk's Elite stadium addition and how they plan on paying for it in the future.

TIA
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: Bookcat on November 03, 2009, 10:32:39 PM
Ben has a real opportunity to absolutley pwn us hard if he would just ante up.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: QuinnMac on November 04, 2009, 06:59:54 AM
Ben has a real opportunity to absolutley pwn us hard if he would just ante up.
:ohno:
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 07:07:20 AM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: QuinnMac on November 04, 2009, 07:12:37 AM
doodz it's basketball season now, he prob. just forgot about the game this weekend.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 08:18:21 AM
I know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts.  ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ku 49
KSU 17
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on November 04, 2009, 08:24:39 AM
Commas are pretty small, so of course not.


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 08:27:16 AM
Commas are pretty small, so of course not.


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
hahahahaha..nice catch. i'm not even going to edit it.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: FHSU92 on November 04, 2009, 08:36:20 AM
Here be my thoughts.  ksu is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The O has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the D will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ksu 49
ku 17
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: mjrod on November 04, 2009, 08:41:53 AM
My comma is bigger than your comma...

ku -> ,  , <- KSU..

Size matters.

Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 09:02:10 AM
Here be my thoughts.  ksu is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The O has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the D will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ksu 49
ku 17

original, glad to see that FHSU education paying off.  probably on the debate team weren't you
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 09:02:54 AM
I sure hope that ksu doesn't come out in a comma with the early start.

 :ohno:
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: KSUFansPoster495028 on November 04, 2009, 09:09:48 AM
I know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts.  ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ku 49
KSU 17

huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATS
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 09:17:07 AM
I know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts.  ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ku 49
KSU 17



huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATS

they haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU.  So yeah, they are playing pretty good.  The O just needs to get them off the field.  They faced over 70 plays against TT.  That makes any D look pretty bad.  But they were still held to under 300 yards by ku's D.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: Bookcat on November 04, 2009, 09:18:38 AM
If we score first and win the field position battle..its all over folks. Run DThomas.
Title: this is why ku "fans" are not to be trusted
Post by: The Kaiser on November 04, 2009, 09:28:41 AM
"they haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU"

So, that 356 surrendered to Tech didn't happen?  What about that 337 to OU? 322 to Colorado?  I guess next you are going to tell me that 512 ISU ran up never happened either?
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: Legore on November 04, 2009, 09:34:03 AM
I know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts.  ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ku 49
KSU 17


huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATS

they haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU.  So yeah, they are playing pretty good.  The O just needs to get them off the field.  They faced over 70 plays against TT.  That makes any D look pretty bad.  But they were still held to under 300 yards by ku's D.

First of all your stats are just plain wrong.  Tech had 358 yards against ku, OU had 337, and CU had 322 yards so you've given up more then 312 in every game since ISU.  You've given up more then 30 points in each of these games.  Your yardage totals get helped by th fact that you've given up very short field scores and defensive scores.  

This is one reason why total yards isn't always the best indicator of how well you play.  Throw a pick six every time you have the ball and you won't give up many yards.  KSU didn't give up a ton of yards in the first quarter to OU but gave up 21 points because they had short fields.  In the second half we gave up a gobs of yards but only allowed 14 points because they had long field.   We need to give ku long fields and let them have their yards because they don't mean much without points.  
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: jthutch on November 04, 2009, 09:42:34 AM
Yeah turning the ball over inside the 20 doesn't give other teams much of a chance to rack up yards.  Good deductive reasoning on that one Jayhoax. 
Title: Re: this is why ku "fans" are not to be trusted
Post by: KSUTOMMY on November 04, 2009, 09:48:13 AM
"they haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU"

So, that 356 surrendered to Tech didn't happen?  What about that 337 to OU? 322 to Colorado?  I guess next you are going to tell me that 512 ISU ran up never happened either?

Umm, what's the word I am looking for? Oh yes, here it is -

owned
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on November 04, 2009, 09:51:48 AM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.

Dead on.  If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory?  Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 09:53:09 AM
I know i'm not the old rotund bmdub, but let me drop my thoughts.  ku is in a corner and has to win to have a chance at winning the north.  The D has been playing pretty damn good lately and you know the O will not stay in a comma the whole season.

ku 49
KSU 17


huh? if you call that "good" then that's "GREAT" for KSUCATS

they haven't allowed more than 312 yrds in a game since ISU.  So yeah, they are playing pretty good.  The O just needs to get them off the field.  They faced over 70 plays against TT.  That makes any D look pretty bad.  But they were still held to under 300 yards by ku's D.

First of all your stats are just plain wrong.  Tech had 358 yards against ku, OU had 337, and CU had 322 yards so you've given up more then 312 in every game since ISU.  You've given up more then 30 points in each of these games.  Your yardage totals get helped by th fact that you've given up very short field scores and defensive scores.  

This is one reason why total yards isn't always the best indicator of how well you play.  Throw a pick six every time you have the ball and you won't give up many yards.  KSU didn't give up a ton of yards in the first quarter to OU but gave up 21 points because they had short fields.  In the second half we gave up a gobs of yards but only allowed 14 points because they had long field.   We need to give ku long fields and let them have their yards because they don't mean much without points.  
misremembered the article.  they haven't given up more than 358 since ISU.
i will accept the ownage this time.  Doesn't change my prediction though.

 :blindfold:
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: j@yh@wks on November 04, 2009, 09:54:27 AM
now he just looks like a puss.
Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.

and this is different than normal in what way?
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: Legore on November 04, 2009, 10:03:56 AM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.

Dead on.  If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory?  Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.


It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything  he's said is already proven wrong.  He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. 

None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season.   All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching.  Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year.  But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. 
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on November 04, 2009, 10:13:57 AM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.

Dead on.  If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory?  Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.


It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything  he's said is already proven wrong.  He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. 

None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season.   All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching.  Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year.  But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. 

Good point.  Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board.  But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had.  He clearly doesn't know much about the sport.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: Perry on November 04, 2009, 10:16:57 AM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.

Dead on.  If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory?  Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.


It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything  he's said is already proven wrong.  He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. 

None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season.   All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching.  Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year.  But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. 

Good point.  Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board.  But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had.  He clearly doesn't know much about the sport is a squawktard.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: WildcatNkilt on November 04, 2009, 12:07:27 PM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.

Dead on.  If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory?  Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.


It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything  he's said is already proven wrong.  He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. 

None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season.   All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching.  Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year.  But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. 

Good point.  Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board.  But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had.  He clearly doesn't know much about the sport is a bandwagon fan.

FYP

I was looking forward to a "clear" explanation on how uk was going to pay for their new football renivations with their amazing sellout crowds.
Title: Re: Bentard
Post by: cireksu on November 04, 2009, 12:15:14 PM
I think he had 35-21.

he's bringing it pretty weak.

He should have not left just bc ku was losing to south teams.  He could have been talking mad shlt the whole time and then been vindicated like 07.

he lost that opportunity.  now he just looks like a puss.

Dead on.  If you are going to leave, why not do it in a blaze of glory?  Now, he just looks like a little sissy bandwagoner/poser if they win.


It's because no matter what happens this weekend pretty much everything  he's said is already proven wrong.  He thought ku was building a monster program and the talent level gap between ku and kSU was at decade of dominance levels. 

None of us here thought KSU could beat ku this season.   All we ever said was ku wasn't that good and we could catch them and pass them with a few years worth of decent recruiting and coaching.  Now it's looking like ku is even worse then we thought and we actually have a chance to beat them as soon as this year.  But even if ku does squeak out some kind of win in Manhattan he was still wrong about pretty much everything he said. 

Good point.  Still surprised because he was obsessed with this board.  But his "ku's second string would beat KSU' prediction kind of ruins any credibility he ever had.  He clearly doesn't know much about the sport.

That and the JoePa thing