KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: novembereleven on November 03, 2009, 05:27:22 PM
-
Have a look at the "amazing" QB's Nubb's had to face this year.
First...in Big 12 play:
Mizzou (Win):
Blaine Gabbert- 1st String-True Soph, 1st Big 12 start, on a bad ankle that's still bothering him.
Texas Tech (Loss):
Steven Sheffied- 2nd String- RS Junior, torched Nubb playing much of the game on a Broken Foot (and KSU much worse on a healthy foot)
ISU (Loss):
Jerome Tiller- 2nd String- RS Frosh, beat Nubb in Lincoln in his first D1 start
Baylor (Win):
Nick Florence- 3rd String- RS Frosh, lost by a 10 point margin in his 3rd career start for awful Baylor Bears
For those keeping score at home...that's 1-First Stringer, 2-2nd Stringers and 1-3rd String QB at the midway point of the Big 12 season....two on bad lower extremeties.
Hell, the non-conference provided better QB's than the Big 12 and it's still a completely crappy group. Probably the best QB they've played is Florida Atlantic's Rusty Smith. Tyrod Taylor of Va. Tech is a dismal passer (think Ell Roberson as a Soph) and had his 2nd best passing day of the year vs. Nubb...and it was still under 200 yards. Hell, even the Masson kid from La. Laff completed a higher percentage vs. Nubb than he did vs. KSU, despite the fact Nubb killed them in Lincoln.
And the breaks continue as they get OU's back-up to Bradford (who is admittedly good, but no Sam Bradford at this point), First year starter Grant Gregory from KSU and either the dismal Hawkins kid or equally dismal Hansen kid from CU.
Throw in the pretty good (though struggling) Todd Reesing and they'll play, what 3-5 decent/good QB's all year, half of which were injured? Pathetic! :banghead:
-
Mizzou (Win):
Blaine Gabbert- 1st String-True Soph, 1st Big 12 start, on a bad ankle that's still bothering him.
Suh caused the bad ankle in the game. Perhaps you should do a little more research before using the keyboard again.. :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
-
Mizzou (Win):
Blaine Gabbert- 1st String-True Soph, 1st Big 12 start, on a bad ankle that's still bothering him.
Suh caused the bad ankle in the game. Perhaps you should do a little more research before using the keyboard again.. :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
Could be wrong, but wasn't Mizzou dominating till that point? In other words, the Nub D dominates sickly and sucky QB-run offenses.
-
Mizzou (Win):
Blaine Gabbert- 1st String-True Soph, 1st Big 12 start, on a bad ankle that's still bothering him.
Suh caused the bad ankle in the game. Perhaps you should do a little more research before using the keyboard again.. :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
Could be wrong, but wasn't Mizzou dominating till that point? In other words, the Nub D dominates sickly and sucky QB-run offenses.
You are wrong. Mizzou dominated up to 12:00 in the 4th quarter. Then Mizzou realized they sucked.
-
Dearest vantard,
That's the best you can manage? Face it, your team is 2-2 vs. QB's with 3 TOTAL Big 12 starts prior to the Nebraska kick-off with each.
In fact, let's have a look at how many Big 12 starts each QB will have under their belt when the Nubbs play them:
Mizzou-0
Tech-1
ISU-0
Baylor-2
OU-3
ku-21
KSU-6
CU-9
TOTAL-42...half of which belong to Todd Reesing
For a conference which was supposed to be rich with QB talent, your Nubb team has somehow managed to avoid almost all of it. Oh and before you start claiming KSU is in the same situation, I counted 53 QB starts prior to KSU's games. Still not impressive, but over 20% more than the Nubbs.
If you need any further evidence of your pissing away good fortune we could discuss Nubb's losing to two teams fielding back-up RB's (ISU & Va Tech)
Thanks for playing Princess! :D
-
Holding Louisiana-Lafayette scoreless helped a little. How did that one work out for you?
-
The key is to actually improve during the season. How's that working up in the cornfields?
-
Dearest Trike-rider,
Since you are the all knowledge one, explain to us in detail why the Nebraska offense is so bad this year.
Take your time...
Do some research..
Get back to us..
-
Jesus, 11/11 is just &@#%ing crushing it on this board lately.
We need to get this guy to the katpak in Vegas.
-
The key is to actually improve during the season. How's that working up in the cornfields?
Very true, Huskers are not improving as the year goes on. Mr. Trike-rider will report to us soon why that is.
The Offense is stepping backwards every week and November butt sniffer will tell us why.
Right now, Gay State is playing the best ball in the north. But that's not much to be proud of.
-
Jesus, 11/11 is just fracking crushing it on this board lately.
We need to get this guy to the katpak in Vegas.
The only crushing I hear is the sound of his last two brain cells banging together..
-
the blackshirts vs. OU's offense. hmmm. that's a tough one. :ugh:
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
Pride,
Let him educate us on the Husker offense first. Let's not overload 11/11.. :blindfold:
-
Mizzou (Win):
Blaine Gabbert- 1st String-True Soph, 1st Big 12 start, on a bad ankle that's still bothering him.
Suh caused the bad ankle in the game. Perhaps you should do a little more research before using the keyboard again.. :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
Could be wrong, but wasn't Mizzou dominating till that point? In other words, the Nub D dominates sickly and sucky QB-run offenses.
Last I checked, Gabbert doesn't play defense. Not sure what his injury has to do with the Husker offense scoring points. How was the ride home this afternoon on the short bus? :sleep:
-
Jesus, 11/11 is just fracking crushing it on this board lately.
We need to get this guy to the katpak in Vegas.
The only crushing I hear is the sound of his last two brain cells banging together..
You are aware that 11/11 is on first-name basis with people who make, star-in, and distribute the finest pornography on the earth, right? A bit of respect here is warranted....
-
Jesus, 11/11 is just fracking crushing it on this board lately.
We need to get this guy to the katpak in Vegas.
The only crushing I hear is the sound of his last two brain cells banging together..
You are aware that 11/11 is on first-name basis with people who make, star-in, and distribute the finest pornography on the earth, right? A bit of respect here is warranted....
I did not know that... Sorry about that. He is now known as Sir 11/11... :thumbsup:
-
You know the blackshirts are back when their measure of success is based on a moral victory over Iowa State in their own stadium.
-
You know the blackshirts are back when their measure of success is based on a moral victory over Iowa State in their own stadium.
Bookrat,
How many points did they give up to Iowa State? How many point did Iowa State score on KSU? :blahblah:
-
You know the blackshirts are back when their measure of success is based on a moral victory over Iowa State in their own stadium.
Bookrat,
How many points did they give up to Iowa State? How many point did Iowa State score on KSU? :blahblah:
Which one of those came out with a W and which one came out with an L? Seems a little more important to me.
-
Dearest Husker Pride,
That may be the single dumbest attempt to defend the Nubb defense imaginable. While the field position of those turnovers may have driven the Nubb fans crazy, with only a couple exceptions, it worked out GREAT for the Husker defense.
Seriously, look at the ISU starting field position after four of those turnovers. Any special teams coach would have been thrilled with Iowa State drives starting deep in ISU territory at 17, 20, 20, 5. That's the equivalent of 2 touchbacks and two poor returns for the opposition. Perfect for the defense!
Only 2 of the 8 turnovers presented genuine problems starting on the Nubb 38 and Nubb 22 (actually started at the Nubb 37 after a 15 yard post-possession personal foul on ISU). The former resulted in a field goal, the latter a missed field goal.
The final two turnovers came within the last 3 minutes of the game, resulting in three runs to burn the clock and 3 times taking a knee to end the game.
Face it, you're just another delusional Husker fan trying to find some measure of solace in yet another Husker squad unable to live up to your bloated and unrealistic expectations.
Could KSU do the same? I honestly don't know, as KSU didn't get the luxury of playing ISU at home, against a first time QB starter and back-up RB. But I'd like to think those factors would have helped. :lol:
Thanks again for stopping by to share your own brand of crazy.
-
Sure, answer him first.... You still doing your research?
-
You know the blackshirts are back when their measure of success is based on a moral victory over Iowa State in their own stadium.
Bookrat,
How many points did they give up to Iowa State? How many point did Iowa State score on KSU? :blahblah:
Arnaud vs. JT Tiller
neutral field vs. Memorial
you guys choked the game and should have won...I'll give you that....but other than that..just accept how embarrassing it was for NU to blow that game. You'll prolly rebound and beat us in Memorial so don't sweat it.
-
Off the record, KSU is peaking right now. It's anyone's game in the north.
-
Sure, answer him first.... You still doing your research?
Im sorry to inform you, but along with Hawkins you have the craptiest coach in the north and its not even close...whats the deal with Bo Peep anyways??? Inbreeding or just a slight touch of the downs syndrome...the guy just looks f'n retarded...
God i cant wait to hear the excuses from the fightin corn when OU beats you bastards by 35 points..and its gonna happen..im guessing 35-0
-
Sure, answer him first.... You still doing your research?
Im sorry to inform you, but along with Hawkins you have the craptiest coach in the north and its not even close...whats the deal with Bo Peep anyways??? Inbreeding or just a slight touch of the downs syndrome...the guy just looks f'n retarded...
God i cant wait to hear the excuses from the fightin corn when OU beats you bastards by 35 points..and its gonna happen..im guessing 35-0
Nope, we get a field goal and the D scores a TD. So you are saying KSU is a 25 point favorite over the Huskers? :bs:
-
Dearest Husker Pride,
That may be the single dumbest attempt to defend the Nubb defense imaginable. While the field position of those turnovers may have driven the Nubb fans crazy, with only a couple exceptions, it worked out GREAT for the Husker defense.
Seriously, look at the ISU starting field position after four of those turnovers. Any special teams coach would have been thrilled with Iowa State drives starting deep in ISU territory at 17, 20, 20, 5. That's the equivalent of 2 touchbacks and two poor returns for the opposition. Perfect for the defense!
Only 2 of the 8 turnovers presented genuine problems starting on the Nubb 38 and Nubb 22 (actually started at the Nubb 37 after a 15 yard post-possession personal foul on ISU). The former resulted in a field goal, the latter a missed field goal.
The final two turnovers came within the last 3 minutes of the game, resulting in three runs to burn the clock and 3 times taking a knee to end the game.
Face it, you're just another delusional Husker fan trying to find some measure of solace in yet another Husker squad unable to live up to your bloated and unrealistic expectations.
Could KSU do the same? I honestly don't know, as KSU didn't get the luxury of playing ISU at home, against a first time QB starter and back-up RB. But I'd like to think those factors would have helped. :lol:
Thanks again for stopping by to share your own brand of crazy.
Dear 11/11 it's good to see that it only took you a little under 4 hours to develop your reply..nice. Did your tutor have to help with that or did your parents for go the extra cost and plop down at the computer with you?
We have 2 players on the D line that have garnered national honors in the last few weeks ( nagurski comes to mind, Natl. pow) that may have something to do with it as well. Not to mention that our Defense was ranked 55th last year and has made a steady climb.
Seriously, take off the purple glases and start to look objectively at things before becoming a purple tool. It would do you a world of good. Oh, and by the way, placing "Tard" at the end of names makes you sound like Daxi....and you don't want that.
-
Mizzou (Win):
Blaine Gabbert- 1st String-True Soph, 1st Big 12 start, on a bad ankle that's still bothering him.
Suh caused the bad ankle in the game. Perhaps you should do a little more research before using the keyboard again.. :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
Could be wrong, but wasn't Mizzou dominating till that point? In other words, the Nub D dominates sickly and sucky QB-run offenses.
Last I checked, Gabbert doesn't play defense. Not sure what his injury has to do with the Husker offense scoring points. How was the ride home this afternoon on the short bus? :sleep:
oops my bad for not paying attention closely to a game that means nothing to me...I guess if I were a regular poster on a Husker/Tiger board I'd be more into that.
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
that's an impossible scenario, as we don't put the ball on the ground 8 times in one game, let alone 8 times in 4 games.
having a decent coach helps, too. sorry you guys can't experience that.
-
...and Husker Pride follows up with absolute nonsense, which is the norm. Dinner with my girlfriend caused the delay, because unlike you and the other foam corncob hat wearing idiots, I have a life.
As for my argument, it's really quite sound and logical. Four of the turnovers were the equivalent of good punts leaving ISU with long fields of 80 yards or more, 2 were virtually meaningless to the defense, as they were just clock killers and the two that did place Nubb in a precarious position resulted in a missed FG and a successful field goal. Pretty simple, for someone with a brain and/or not living in a trailer house with a Nubb flag flapping proudly near the septic tank.
The turnovers made you crazy because so many of them were botched scores or near scores. But that has little to do with the defensive strategy or ranking. Your defense was going against Iowa State's back-up QB and back-up RB which do indeed have strategic and ranking consequences.
As for the constant Suh rattle coming out of Lincoln. It's sickening the level of your obsession and akin to the Tebow nonsense from the national media. He's a very good player...absolutely! But likely the subject of masturbatory fantasies only in the Lincoln and Omaha metro areas.
As for Crick's big game vs. Baylor's 3rd string freshman QB, congrats to the young man! Now what's your point? KSU's Courtney Herndon won the Walter Camp National Player of the Week honor last year as well. He blocked a punt for a TD, picked off a pass and also scooped a fumble running it 43 yards for a TD. Was it worthy of congratulation? Absolutely! Was it worthy of obsession and constant blather from a fanbase experiencing hard times? Not really. But that's what it would have been for KSU last year and exactly what it is coming from you today.
Thanks for stopping by....
:yikes:
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
-
Sir 11/11,
Here is a little hint for you:
Cody Green, QB, Nebraska. Green became the Huskers’ first true freshman starter at quarterback since Tommie Frazier in 1992, getting the call at Baylor. While his numbers were modest, the Huskers won. And the clock on the Green era appears to have officially begun.
So the Huskers are starting a 4 string FRESHMEN QB. Kind of kills your point..
Where is the review of the Huskers QB's and RB's for this year?
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Gayhawk,
You playing the If and Buts game. If the Huskers don't have 8 turnover would that be 42 more points Nebraska would have scored.
Is it true that you are a Poultry Sex Offender? :bootyshake:
-
Did Husker Pride really just use the fact he didn't reply immediately as a put down? LMAO!
-
Vanro...I was discussing the defense, but it goes well beyond just the QB play and experience on the offensive side. Sorry I haven't responded, as things like work and social life have made my “expert” offensive analysis kind of difficult.
Let me preface my opinion of your offense by asking why the hell Nebraska was all bluster prior to the year when anyone could see the losses were substantial from last year and that there would be a drop-off? Is it just a product of the media picking the usual suspects or Nubb fans begging for acknowledgment after a very average bowl win vs. an equally average Clemson team (both selected solely to sell more tickets during a recession)? It was similar with Mizzou, but the pundits weren't listening. I guess it could be simply because you had to pick someone in the North? I honestly don't have the answer.
As for the Nebraska offense (as I see it):
QB- Yes Cody Green is a true freshman who is starting prematurely, solely for the failings of the kid who should have been 2nd string this year, Zac Lee. Quite a difference in your starting QB being no good and having a Heisman candidate (Baylor and OU) get hurt. So don't even try to make that argument with me. Witt should have been your QB, but he bolted and left you with poor replacements. Ganz was (surprisingly) going to be tough to replace no matter who would have taken over. This should have been the first sign, but as usual it wasn't heeded by the Sker fans who carried on about Lee's daddy being a former NFL QB.
RB- You were left with little depth after the departure of Marlon Lucky and dismissal of Quentin Castille. Helu is good, but as the workhorse his body is breaking down. He didn't carry the majority of the workload last year with a nice stable of backs, until late in the year. So he stayed somewhat healthy. Lucky wasn't the world beater than Nubb fans claimed he'd be, but he was a nice Big 12 back with very good pass catching skills. I'll take Lucky and Castille splitting time with the #1 over a true frosh (injured Rex Burkhead) any day. Again, the handwriting was on the wall, but Nubb fans weren't in the mood for reading.
WR- This one pains me, as I was always a skeptic about Swift and Peterson (ie. the great white hopes). But these guys quietly (and spectacularly from time-to-time) produced, to the tune of 1,700 yards last year. How in the world did you expect this kind of production to be replaced without fail? Holt and Paul may have come to Sker nation with much more bluster (common these days as recruiting stars are the only thing that matters in Huskerland). But nobody should have anticipated their production to match that of departed Sr's Swift and Peterson. I didn't...did you?
TE- McNeill's one of the best in the Big 12 and was last year too.
OL- What did you have 2 or 3 returning starters this year? Last year's group did pretty well, but there were holes to fill (pun intended) and it appears you're having a little bit of trouble filling those holes. When I heard the name of KSU castoff Derek Meyer being thrown around in the summer I thought this might be the case. But I don't think the OL issues are as bad as the skill positions, particularly QB and RB.
Finally- NU really has no offensive identity anymore. If I tried to describe what you do the term "pro-style" would be used...surely with a "sort-of" comment following. I'd venture that KSU has more offensive identity after 3/4 of a year under Snyder than Pelini and crew have established after 1 3/4 years at the helm. It's kind of like the confusion Hawkins has wrought at Colorado...with a less talented Buffs team.
Ok...there you go Vanro. You guys still might win the North, but you according to the pre-season hype you should have done so going away considering the breaks you've had with opposition QB's. My QB breakdown just further illustrates this point.
-
omg 11/11 is absolutely schucking these cornholes.
:users:
-
While Nebraska is in second place in the Big 12 North behind Kansas State and their defense is actually pretty stingy, (No. 4 in scoring defense), their 5-3 record is a bit deceiving. Three of their wins are against the Sun Belt Conference also-rans Florida Atlantic, Arkansas State and Louisiana-Lafayette while the other two teams they beat (Missouri and Baylor) have a collective 1-7 conference record.
A little diff perspective on the powerful Nubs
from: http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=10313322#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&photo=10313264 (http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=10313322#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&photo=10313264)
:lol:
-
While Nebraska is in second place in the Big 12 North behind Kansas State and their defense is actually pretty stingy, (No. 4 in scoring defense), their 5-3 record is a bit deceiving. Three of their wins are against the Sun Belt Conference also-rans Florida Atlantic, Arkansas State and Louisiana-Lafayette while the other two teams they beat (Missouri and Baylor) have a collective 1-7 conference record.
A little diff perspective on the powerful Nubs
from: http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=10313322#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&photo=10313264 (http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=10313322#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&photo=10313264)
:lol:
Remember that KSU needs to win 7 games to be in a bowl game due to your schedule. :blank:
-
what 3-5 decent/good QB's all year, half of which were injured? Pathetic! Bang Head
For those keeping score at home...that's 1-First Stringer, 2-2nd Stringers
and 1-3rd String QB at the midway point of the Big 12 season....two on bad lower extremeties.
Thanks for the above update and making my point.
So this seems to be the case in alot of teams this year.
The blackshirts are paper tigers because of others teams injuries?
Huskers could be undefended if no one gets hurt on offense.
That's a dumb ass statement but goes with yours about the Husker D.
Huskers now have the 5th string quarterback starting(freshman)
and running the 4th and 5th string RB.(freshman).
Roster in February:
QB:
1). Witt
2a).Spano
2b).Lee
3). Green
RB:
1). Helu
2). Castille
3). Burkhead
4). Robinson
5). Ward
Roster Today:
Witt - Transfer
Spano - Hurt, out for the year.
Lee - Benched.
Green - True freshman now starting.
Washington - Converted DB now playing QB.
RB:
Helu - Bad shoulder. Basically done for the year.
Castille - Kicked off team for bong hits.
Burkhead - Out for year with broke foot.
Robinson - Freshman getting most of the work.
Ward - Another freshman getting time.
-
11/11 just going through these dudes like a combine through old corn.
-
11/11 just going through these dudes like a combine through old corn.
Really? perhaps you should try reading with both eyes open. :lol: :jerkoff:
-
This smack-off was awesome in 2001.
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Gayhawk,
You playing the If and Buts game. If the Huskers don't have 8 turnover would that be 42 more points Nebraska would have scored.
Is it true that you are a Poultry Sex Offender? :bootyshake:
are you saying that on every possession that nebraska committed a turnover, they would have scored a td? that's what you're insinuating, right?
:lol:
-
Did you watch the game or were you too busy working changing bed pans?
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Just a reply to the dumb ass comment made above. Iowa State's starting QB and RB would not have made much a difference in the outcome.
-
Did you watch the game or were you too busy working changing bed pans?
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Just a reply to the dumb ass comment made above. Iowa State's starting QB and RB would not have made much a difference in the outcome.
LFBIQ.
-
ESAD
-
Did you watch the game or were you too busy working changing bed pans?
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Just a reply to the dumb ass comment made above. Iowa State's starting QB and RB would not have made much a difference in the outcome.
You're right they would have made no difference in the outcome. Either way Iowa State would have won which is all that really matters.
-
11/11 just going through these dudes like a combine through old corn.
Really? perhaps you should try reading with both eyes open. :lol: :jerkoff:
He is hammering you bro. Sucks for you but it is obvious.
-
No, he made my point that the Huskers defense ranking has nothing to do with the QB's we have played this year.
Did I type that slow enough for you?
-
Did you watch the game or were you too busy working changing bed pans?
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Just a reply to the dumb ass comment made above. Iowa State's starting QB and RB would not have made much a difference in the outcome.
You're right they would have made no difference in the outcome. Either way Iowa State would have won which is all that really matters.
Yep, when you turnover the ball eight times the odds are against you on winning the game.
-
No, he made my point that the Huskers defense ranking has nothing to do with the QB's we have played this year.
Did I type that slow enough for you?
Type it as slow as you want professor, he is dismantling you.
-
What ever pinhead.. Didn't realize that this was "Jerry's Kids" week on the board. :jerkoff: :banghead:
-
What ever pinhead.. Didn't realize that this was "Jerry's Kids" week on the board. :jerkoff: :banghead:
Call into Keitz and get laughed at for being the third husker fan in a row for saying NU is unstoppable.
-
What ever pinhead.. Didn't realize that this was "Jerry's Kids" week on the board. :jerkoff: :banghead:
Call into Keitz and get laughed at for being the third husker fan in a row for saying NU is unstoppable.
We are unstoppable. No reason to stop us, just wait for us to turn it over to you.
OU has 11/11 and Bookie Pimp starting as LB this weekend. Their job? sit and wait for the ball to roll to them and fall on it. :excited: :nahnah:
-
Did you watch the game or were you too busy working changing bed pans?
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Just a reply to the dumb ass comment made above. Iowa State's starting QB and RB would not have made much a difference in the outcome.
You're right they would have made no difference in the outcome. Either way Iowa State would have won which is all that really matters.
Yep, when you turnover the ball eight times the odds are against you on winning the game.
Yep, also when you turnover the ball eight times in one game odds are against you being any good at all. This is the point I think the Nebraska fans seem to be missing. I don't remember the Patriots turning it over 8 times and bragging about how they still kept the score close. If you're defense was as good as you think perhaps you might have actually taken it away from Iowa State and their backup QB once or twice.
-
That was one game, we cut the fumbles back against Baylor. We started throwing Pick 6's against Baylor. The D-Line for the Huskers is the best in the Big 12, but it's average from there back.
-
The problem with your rebuttal vanro was all the nonsense I was reading from the Nubbs came this summer and fall. Not February! I'm certain of this because I don't go near Husker Illustrated during recruiting season. You see the Nubb recruiting articles from Roz, Mike Matya and Rick Shaw (what kind of stupid name is that) read like homoerotic fiction night at the gayest San Francisco bath house. Once the "blue chippers" ACTUAL PERFORMANCE starts feeling like bath house fisting night for Nubb fans, then I'll have a look at the articles for a good laugh. I highly recommend checking out the lovefest for Zac Lee and Cody Green when these four star QB's committed.
Let's just stop with the revisionist history and realize that Witt was long gone and Spano down with a knee injury when I was reading how great Lee and Green were going to be and how anybody picking Mizzou or ku were idiots. Your recollection of where these guys stood upon Witt's departure is completely wrong. Check out this online poll of your fellow Sker nuts at the time.
www.cornnation.com/2009/2/22/768225/patrick-witt-decides-to-tr (http://www.cornnation.com/2009/2/22/768225/patrick-witt-decides-to-tr)
Projected Nubb Starter (post-Witt transfer)
53% - Lee
14% - Green
6% - Spano
3% - Alternating
22%- No idea
Quite different from your pity party isn't it? I don't see Spano being "2A"...do you? By the way, how is Green the 5th stringer, when you only have 4 listed
Furthermore, the Husker "authority" who wrote the article, Husker Mike, put it in less sympathetic terms, painting the rosy red picture a little brighter, even if Witt had stayed:
"Going into spring practice, I really wasn't sure where Nebraska was going to go for a quarterback. I had it about 34% Witt, 33% Lee, 20% Green, 10% chance of alternating quarterbacks, and 3% Spano. The only reason why Witt was ahead was simply because he edged out Lee this season."
Have another look at the fabricated depth you outlined. Feel stupid?
Equally stupid is your analysis of the RB's.
RB:
Helu - ("Basically" still playing with carries last week and the week before)
Castille - (It appears he has vanro's company on the bubbly pipe)
Burkhead - (Heard he'd likely be back for Colorado and definitely for a bowl game)
Robinson - (RB coach Tim Beck planned on playing Robinson this year at the beginning of camp)
Ward - (Started camp behind only Helu and Castille)
HI Premium article: http://nebraska.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=928&CID=975240
So in reality you're starting your second string QB because your starter sucks (but is available) and you're playing your 1st, 3rd and 4th string running backs with your 2nd stringer coming back soon. The Sooners, Clones and Bears wish they were that healthy!
-
That was one game, we cut the fumbles back against Baylor. We started throwing Pick 6's against Baylor. The D-Line for the Huskers is the best in the Big 12, but it's average from there back.
Impressive, something to hang your corn-hat-thingy on.
-
The problem with your rebuttal vanro was all the nonsense I was reading from the Nubbs came this summer and fall. Not February! I'm certain of this because I don't go near Husker Illustrated during recruiting season. You see the Nubb recruiting articles from Roz, Mike Matya and Rick Shaw (what kind of stupid name is that) read like homoerotic fiction night at the gayest San Francisco bath house. Once the "blue chippers" ACTUAL PERFORMANCE starts feeling like bath house fisting night for Nubb fans, then I'll have a look at the articles for a good laugh. I highly recommend checking out the lovefest for Zac Lee and Cody Green when these four star QB's committed.
Let's just stop with the revisionist history and realize that Witt was long gone and Spano down with a knee injury when I was reading how great Lee and Green were going to be and how anybody picking Mizzou or ku were idiots. Your recollection of where these guys stood upon Witt's departure is completely wrong. Check out this online poll of your fellow Sker nuts at the time.
www.cornnation.com/2009/2/22/768225/patrick-witt-decides-to-tr (http://www.cornnation.com/2009/2/22/768225/patrick-witt-decides-to-tr)
Projected Nubb Starter (post-Witt transfer)
53% - Lee
14% - Green
6% - Spano
3% - Alternating
22%- No idea
Quite different from your pity party isn't it? I don't see Spano being "2A"...do you? By the way, how is Green the 5th stringer, when you only have 4 listed
Furthermore, the Husker "authority" who wrote the article, Husker Mike, put it in less sympathetic terms, painting the rosy red picture a little brighter, even if Witt had stayed:
"Going into spring practice, I really wasn't sure where Nebraska was going to go for a quarterback. I had it about 34% Witt, 33% Lee, 20% Green, 10% chance of alternating quarterbacks, and 3% Spano. The only reason why Witt was ahead was simply because he edged out Lee this season."
Have another look at the fabricated depth you outlined. Feel stupid?
Equally stupid is your analysis of the RB's.
RB:
Helu - ("Basically" still playing with carries last week and the week before)
Castille - (It appears he has vanro's company on the bubbly pipe)
Burkhead - (Heard he'd likely be back for Colorado and definitely for a bowl game)
Robinson - (RB coach Tim Beck planned on playing Robinson this year at the beginning of camp)
Ward - (Started camp behind only Helu and Castille)
HI Premium article: http://nebraska.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=928&CID=975240
So in reality you're starting your second string QB because your starter sucks (but is available) and you're playing your 1st, 3rd and 4th string running backs with your 2nd stringer coming back soon. The Sooners, Clones and Bears wish they were that healthy!
For someone who makes themselves out to be smarter than everyone else you sure have alot to learn. You do realize that all the clippings that you read are just speculation and conjecture plus opinions. The only people who know for sure are the ones who coach and evaluate on a daily basis. Feel stupid?
So all of your hyperbole is based on conjecture and speculation. I'm sure if I wanted to take the time and do as much research as you do that I could find the same about your kitties. But, I have a life.
Your attempts at trying to put a negative spin on our team are just that.We will be homers just as you will be. Why not focus your attention and angst towards ku? Oh that's right, can't get past the envy :'(
-
The problem with your rebuttal vanro was all the nonsense I was reading from the Nubbs came this summer and fall. Not February! I'm certain of this because I don't go near Husker Illustrated during recruiting season. You see the Nubb recruiting articles from Roz, Mike Matya and Rick Shaw (what kind of stupid name is that) read like homoerotic fiction night at the gayest San Francisco bath house. Once the "blue chippers" ACTUAL PERFORMANCE starts feeling like bath house fisting night for Nubb fans, then I'll have a look at the articles for a good laugh. I highly recommend checking out the lovefest for Zac Lee and Cody Green when these four star QB's committed.
Let's just stop with the revisionist history and realize that Witt was long gone and Spano down with a knee injury when I was reading how great Lee and Green were going to be and how anybody picking Mizzou or ku were idiots. Your recollection of where these guys stood upon Witt's departure is completely wrong. Check out this online poll of your fellow Sker nuts at the time.
www.cornnation.com/2009/2/22/768225/patrick-witt-decides-to-tr (http://www.cornnation.com/2009/2/22/768225/patrick-witt-decides-to-tr)
Projected Nubb Starter (post-Witt transfer)
53% - Lee
14% - Green
6% - Spano
3% - Alternating
22%- No idea
Quite different from your pity party isn't it? I don't see Spano being "2A"...do you? By the way, how is Green the 5th stringer, when you only have 4 listed
Furthermore, the Husker "authority" who wrote the article, Husker Mike, put it in less sympathetic terms, painting the rosy red picture a little brighter, even if Witt had stayed:
"Going into spring practice, I really wasn't sure where Nebraska was going to go for a quarterback. I had it about 34% Witt, 33% Lee, 20% Green, 10% chance of alternating quarterbacks, and 3% Spano. The only reason why Witt was ahead was simply because he edged out Lee this season."
Have another look at the fabricated depth you outlined. Feel stupid?
Equally stupid is your analysis of the RB's.
RB:
Helu - ("Basically" still playing with carries last week and the week before)
Castille - (It appears he has vanro's company on the bubbly pipe)
Burkhead - (Heard he'd likely be back for Colorado and definitely for a bowl game)
Robinson - (RB coach Tim Beck planned on playing Robinson this year at the beginning of camp)
Ward - (Started camp behind only Helu and Castille)
HI Premium article: http://nebraska.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=928&CID=975240
So in reality you're starting your second string QB because your starter sucks (but is available) and you're playing your 1st, 3rd and 4th string running backs with your 2nd stringer coming back soon. The Sooners, Clones and Bears wish they were that healthy!
JFC :cheers:
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Gayhawk,
You playing the If and Buts game. If the Huskers don't have 8 turnover would that be 42 more points Nebraska would have scored.
Is it true that you are a Poultry Sex Offender? :bootyshake:
point is if ISU had their starting QB and RB they would have scored more points than your O. Even without the TO's.
To your second question, yes I am, tell your mom to quit calling me, I don't care if she can cluck.
-
So tell us genius ( this should be good ) if ISU would of recovered 8 TO's from KSU would your D hold them to 9 points??
Don't think so....thanks for playing
had isu had their starting QB, who is very good, and their B12 leading RB for the game in lincoln, you guys lose by 20 at the least. Easy.
Dude, we are playing mental masturbation here. No more IF's and BUT's. we are starting to sound like UT fans here..
Call Mom back, heard she's good.. :lick:
Gayhawk,
You playing the If and Buts game. If the Huskers don't have 8 turnover would that be 42 more points Nebraska would have scored.
Is it true that you are a Poultry Sex Offender? :bootyshake:
point is if ISU had their starting QB and RB they would have scored more points than your O. Even without the TO's.
To your second question, yes I am, tell your mom to quit calling me, I don't care if she can cluck.
Dude, we are playing mental masturbation here. No more IF's and BUT's. we are starting to sound like UT fans here..
Call Mom back, heard she's good.. :lick:
-
JFC learn to quote properly.
-
the blackshirts vs. OU's offense. hmmm. that's a tough one. :ugh:
They looked like they matched up pretty well to me.
-
the blackshirts vs. OU's offense. hmmm. that's a tough one. :ugh:
They looked like they matched up pretty well to me.
and yet again the huskers don't have to face the starting QB. Reesing probably gets hurt this week in practice. Just sayin.
-
j@yh@wks your qb is a tough little guy, doubt mangino lets him get hurt in pratice this week. Best of luck to your team, I honestly think you have a great chance to beat nu in Larryville because I think your offense can outscore nu, unless of course you have a bunch of to's.
-
j@yh@wks your qb is a tough little guy, doubt mangino lets him get hurt in pratice this week. Best of luck to your team, I honestly think you have a great chance to beat nu in Larryville because I think your offense can outscore nu, unless of course you have a bunch of to's.
apparently you haven't seen ku and it's 12 TO's the last 4 games. Least we don't have 8 in one game (looking at nub players)
-
could see an NCAA record for turnovers in a game between NU and ku offenses this weekend