KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: Paul11 on October 28, 2009, 04:17:30 PM

Title: If the NCAA required players to stay for 3 years
Post by: Paul11 on October 28, 2009, 04:17:30 PM

We would have a national championship team easily

Pullen
Clemente
Sutton
Walker
Beasley

Bench:
Kelly
Judge
Samuels
Irving
McGruds
Russell

We would easily average 80 ppg

Title: Re: If the NCAA required players to stay for 3 years
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2009, 04:19:42 PM

That would be if the NCAA only required our players to stay for three years.  You would also have to account for the players from all the other teams and we'd be back to where we started. 

Title: Re: If the NCAA required players to stay for 3 years
Post by: Paul11 on October 28, 2009, 04:47:07 PM

ku would have exactly the team they have now and Oklahoma would just have Griffin back and that is it. Texas would be our only competition in the Big 12. I have thought about other teams and I cannot think of anyone who would be able to challenge us unless The UNC juniors would have stayed for another year. Beasley and Walker would average a good 55 per game.

Title: Re: If the NCAA required players to stay for 3 years
Post by: 1albatross on October 28, 2009, 05:14:25 PM

Never say easily.  Makes you sound like the beaks that think they are winning a NC easily this year.

That squad would likely be co-favorites with ku this year for the B12.

N Carolina would be loaded.  Memphis would be loaded.  Pitt would be tough.  Kevin Love would be back at UCLA and Mayo would still be at USC.  Could look up a few more teams, but I think you get my point. 

I think the Cats could be in the discussion, but far from a lock.